Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south different from the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 350 of the 519 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 383 of the 500 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the = 0.01 level of significance? Please select ans asnwer from the following.Thus, the final conclusion is that ...The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is different from the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of the 519 wildfires that were caused by humans in the south is different from the proportion of the 500 wildfires that were caused by humans in the west.The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is equal to the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is different from the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.

We have given that Sample sizes n1= 519 ,n2= 500 Favorable cases x1= 350 , x2= 383

Answered: the proportion of wildfires caused by…

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

100%

Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south different from the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 350 of the 519 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 383 of the 500 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the = 0.01 level of significance?

Please select ans asnwer from the following.

Thus, the final conclusion is that ...
- The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is different from the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.
- The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of the 519 wildfires that were caused by humans in the south is different from the proportion of the 500 wildfires that were caused by humans in the west.
- The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is equal to the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.
- The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is different from the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.

Expert Solution