The production possibility frontier of an economy is as shown in Figure 1. (a) () If the economy produces 15 units of manufoctured goods, whot is the maximum number of non-manufactured goods it can produce? (in) How many manufoctured goods could it produce if production of non-manufoctured goods was 50 units? (b) The economy is currently operating at point C What is the opportunity cost of increasing production of non-manufactured goods by (1) 15 units; (1) 20 units? (c) The econory is at D. Whot is the marginal cost of increasing production of non-manufactured goods to the point () C; (i) B?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question
Unit 4 Question 1 The production possibility frontier of an economy is as shown in Figure 1. (a) () If the economy produces 15 units of manufoctured goods, whot is the maximum number of non-manufactured goods it can produce? (in) How many manufoctured goods could it produce if production of non-manufoctured goods was 50 units? (b) The economy is currently operating at point C What is the opportunity cost of increasing production of non-manufactured goods by (1) 15 units; (1) 20 units? (c) The econory is at D. Whot is the marginal cost of increasing production of non-manufactured goods to the point () C; (i) B? Thanks in advance!
Unit 4
Question 1
The production possibility frontier of an economy is as
shown in Figure 1.
(a) (i) If the economy produces 15 units of manufactured goods,
what is the maximum number of non-manufactured goods
it can produce? (ii) How many manufactured goods could it
produce if production of non-manufactured goods was 50 units?
(b) The economy is currently operating at point C. What is the
opportunity cost of increasing production of non-manufactured
goods by (i) 15 units; (ii) 20 units?
(c) The economy is at D. What is the marginal cost of increasing
production of non-manufactured goods to the point (i) C; (ii) B?
change. At the point C in Figure 1, the economy could produce
more manufactured goods, but at the cost of giving up non-
manufactured goods. For example, the marginal cost of five
more units of manufactured goods would be 10 fewer units of
non-manufactured goods. This is shown by the movement from
C to D along the boundary.
Economic growth or decline
The economy cannot produce at any point outside its existing
PPF. This is because the PPF shows the maximum potential
output of an economy. In Figure 1, for example, the economy
cannot produce at the point G. However, the economy might
be able to move to the right of its PPF in the future if there is
economic growth. An increase in the productive potential of
an economy is shown by a shift outwards of the PPF. In
Figure 2 economic growth pushes the PPF from PP to QQ.
allowing the economy to increase its maximum level of
production, say, from A to B.
Figure 2
Economic growth
An increase in the quantity or quality of the inputs to the
production process means that an economy has increased its
productive potential. This is shown by a shift to the right of the
production possibility frontier from PP to QQ. It would enable the
economy o move production, for instance, from point A to point B.
18
Civilian
production
www
0
Q
P
A
B
Military production
Growth in the economy can happen if:
the quantity of resources available for production increases;
for instance there might be an increase in the number of
workers in the economy, or new factories and offices might
be built;
there is an increase in the quality of resources; education will
make workers more productive whilst technical progress will
allow machines and production processes to produce more
with the same amount of resources.
Production possibility frontiers can shift inwards as well as
outwards. The productive potential of an economy can fall. For
example, war can destroy economic infrastructure. A rapid fall
in the number of workers in a population can reduce potential
output. Some environmentalists predict that global warming will
devastate world agriculture and this will have a knock-on effect
on all production. Global warming could therefore lead to a shift
inwards of the world's PPF.
Many economies experience high levels of unemployment of
workers. Factories and machines may lie idle when this occurs.
Production then occurs within the boundary and not on the
boundary such as at the point F in Figure 1. If resources became
fully employed, the economy could move from inside the
boundary to a point on the boundary. In Figure 1, this would
mean a move from the point F to, say, D or E.
Consumption vs investment
There is a potential conflict between consuming now and
economic growth fuelled by investment. If an economy produces
an extra £10 billion worth of restaurant meals for consumers,
then they are better off today. If, however, that £10 billion had
been spent on new factories, offices or new machinery, the
productive potential of the economy is likely to increase. As a
result, consumers may then be better off in the future.
Figure 3
Consumption vs investment
Country B, which initially devotes more resources to investment
(the production of capital goods) has a higher growth rate than
Country A which initially produces more consumer goods.
Eventually, Country B produces more capital and consumer goods
than Country A because of higher growth.
Consumer
goods
R
Q
P
01112
D
P
Q R
Capital goods
Transcribed Image Text:Unit 4 Question 1 The production possibility frontier of an economy is as shown in Figure 1. (a) (i) If the economy produces 15 units of manufactured goods, what is the maximum number of non-manufactured goods it can produce? (ii) How many manufactured goods could it produce if production of non-manufactured goods was 50 units? (b) The economy is currently operating at point C. What is the opportunity cost of increasing production of non-manufactured goods by (i) 15 units; (ii) 20 units? (c) The economy is at D. What is the marginal cost of increasing production of non-manufactured goods to the point (i) C; (ii) B? change. At the point C in Figure 1, the economy could produce more manufactured goods, but at the cost of giving up non- manufactured goods. For example, the marginal cost of five more units of manufactured goods would be 10 fewer units of non-manufactured goods. This is shown by the movement from C to D along the boundary. Economic growth or decline The economy cannot produce at any point outside its existing PPF. This is because the PPF shows the maximum potential output of an economy. In Figure 1, for example, the economy cannot produce at the point G. However, the economy might be able to move to the right of its PPF in the future if there is economic growth. An increase in the productive potential of an economy is shown by a shift outwards of the PPF. In Figure 2 economic growth pushes the PPF from PP to QQ. allowing the economy to increase its maximum level of production, say, from A to B. Figure 2 Economic growth An increase in the quantity or quality of the inputs to the production process means that an economy has increased its productive potential. This is shown by a shift to the right of the production possibility frontier from PP to QQ. It would enable the economy o move production, for instance, from point A to point B. 18 Civilian production www 0 Q P A B Military production Growth in the economy can happen if: the quantity of resources available for production increases; for instance there might be an increase in the number of workers in the economy, or new factories and offices might be built; there is an increase in the quality of resources; education will make workers more productive whilst technical progress will allow machines and production processes to produce more with the same amount of resources. Production possibility frontiers can shift inwards as well as outwards. The productive potential of an economy can fall. For example, war can destroy economic infrastructure. A rapid fall in the number of workers in a population can reduce potential output. Some environmentalists predict that global warming will devastate world agriculture and this will have a knock-on effect on all production. Global warming could therefore lead to a shift inwards of the world's PPF. Many economies experience high levels of unemployment of workers. Factories and machines may lie idle when this occurs. Production then occurs within the boundary and not on the boundary such as at the point F in Figure 1. If resources became fully employed, the economy could move from inside the boundary to a point on the boundary. In Figure 1, this would mean a move from the point F to, say, D or E. Consumption vs investment There is a potential conflict between consuming now and economic growth fuelled by investment. If an economy produces an extra £10 billion worth of restaurant meals for consumers, then they are better off today. If, however, that £10 billion had been spent on new factories, offices or new machinery, the productive potential of the economy is likely to increase. As a result, consumers may then be better off in the future. Figure 3 Consumption vs investment Country B, which initially devotes more resources to investment (the production of capital goods) has a higher growth rate than Country A which initially produces more consumer goods. Eventually, Country B produces more capital and consumer goods than Country A because of higher growth. Consumer goods R Q P 01112 D P Q R Capital goods
Starter activity
Your Economics A level group decided to raise money for charity. It
took each person a day to take part and you raised £500. You can
give the money to two charities. Which two charities would you
chose? How much would you give to each? If you give £100 more
to one charity, how much less to do you give to the other? What
would have been the likely outcome if half the group had given
excuses and not taken part in the fund-raising activity? Answers to
these questions illustrate opportunity cost, choice and production
possibility frontiers.
The problem of scarcity
Over a period of time, resources are scarce and therefore only a
finite amount can be produced. For example, an economy might
have enough resources at its disposal to be able to produce
30 units of manufactured goods and 30 units of
non-manufactured goods. If it were now to produce more
manufactured goods, it would have to give up some of its
production of non-manufactured items. This is because the
production of a manufactured item has an opportunity
cost in this case the production of non-manufactured item.
The more manufactured goods that are produced, the less
non-manufactured goods can be produced.
This can be shown in Figure 1. The curved line is called the
production possibility frontier (PPF) - other names for it include
production possibility curve or boundary, and transformation
curve. The PPF shows the different combinations of economic
goods which an economy is able to produce if all resources in
the economy are fully and efficiently employed. The economy
therefore could be:
at the point C on its PPF, producing 30 units of manufactured
goods and 30 units of non-manufactured goods;
at the point D, producing 35 units of manufactured goods
and 20 units of non-manufactured goods;
at the point A, devoting all of its resources to the production
of non-manufactured goods;
at the points B or E or anywhere else along the line.
Production cannot take place to the right of the PPF, such
as at the point G. This is because the PPF shows the maximum
output of the economy. It can operate within the boundary,
Figure 1
The production possibility frontier
ABCDE is a production possibility frontier. It shows the different
combinations of goods which can be produced if all resources are
fully and efficiently utilised. The economy can produce at any point
on the line. It cannot produce at G because the PPF shows the
maximum that can be produced. It can produce within the PPF,
such as at F, but less will be produced than the maximum possible.
Non-manufactured goods
50
40
30
20
10
0
10
B
TI
F
30
20
Manufactured goods
B
C
D
E
40
for example at F, but the economy is producing less than its
maximum.
Opportunity cost
The production possibility frontier illustrates clearly the principle
of opportunity cost. Assume that the economy is producing
at the point C in Figure 1 and it is desired to move to the
point D. This means that the output of manufactured goods will
increase from 30 to 35 units. However, the opportunity cost
of that (i.e. what has to be given up because of that choice) is
the lost output of non-manufactured goods, falling from 30 to
20 units. The opportunity cost at C of increasing manufacturing
production by five units is 10 units of non-manufactured goods.
Another way of expressing this is to use the concept of
the margin. In economics, the margin is a point of possible
17
Transcribed Image Text:Starter activity Your Economics A level group decided to raise money for charity. It took each person a day to take part and you raised £500. You can give the money to two charities. Which two charities would you chose? How much would you give to each? If you give £100 more to one charity, how much less to do you give to the other? What would have been the likely outcome if half the group had given excuses and not taken part in the fund-raising activity? Answers to these questions illustrate opportunity cost, choice and production possibility frontiers. The problem of scarcity Over a period of time, resources are scarce and therefore only a finite amount can be produced. For example, an economy might have enough resources at its disposal to be able to produce 30 units of manufactured goods and 30 units of non-manufactured goods. If it were now to produce more manufactured goods, it would have to give up some of its production of non-manufactured items. This is because the production of a manufactured item has an opportunity cost in this case the production of non-manufactured item. The more manufactured goods that are produced, the less non-manufactured goods can be produced. This can be shown in Figure 1. The curved line is called the production possibility frontier (PPF) - other names for it include production possibility curve or boundary, and transformation curve. The PPF shows the different combinations of economic goods which an economy is able to produce if all resources in the economy are fully and efficiently employed. The economy therefore could be: at the point C on its PPF, producing 30 units of manufactured goods and 30 units of non-manufactured goods; at the point D, producing 35 units of manufactured goods and 20 units of non-manufactured goods; at the point A, devoting all of its resources to the production of non-manufactured goods; at the points B or E or anywhere else along the line. Production cannot take place to the right of the PPF, such as at the point G. This is because the PPF shows the maximum output of the economy. It can operate within the boundary, Figure 1 The production possibility frontier ABCDE is a production possibility frontier. It shows the different combinations of goods which can be produced if all resources are fully and efficiently utilised. The economy can produce at any point on the line. It cannot produce at G because the PPF shows the maximum that can be produced. It can produce within the PPF, such as at F, but less will be produced than the maximum possible. Non-manufactured goods 50 40 30 20 10 0 10 B TI F 30 20 Manufactured goods B C D E 40 for example at F, but the economy is producing less than its maximum. Opportunity cost The production possibility frontier illustrates clearly the principle of opportunity cost. Assume that the economy is producing at the point C in Figure 1 and it is desired to move to the point D. This means that the output of manufactured goods will increase from 30 to 35 units. However, the opportunity cost of that (i.e. what has to be given up because of that choice) is the lost output of non-manufactured goods, falling from 30 to 20 units. The opportunity cost at C of increasing manufacturing production by five units is 10 units of non-manufactured goods. Another way of expressing this is to use the concept of the margin. In economics, the margin is a point of possible 17
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Production Possibility Frontier
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education