The primary difficulty with command and control pollution regulation is that: a. It requires significant information to impose correct limits. b. It is costly for regulators to impose. c. It does not encourage the best use of abatement technologies. d. It has high compliance costs. e. All of the above..

The primary difficulty with command and control pollution regulation is that: a. It requires significant information to impose correct limits. b. It is costly for regulators to impose. c. It does not encourage the best use of abatement technologies. d. It has high compliance costs. e. All of the above..

Principles of Economics 2e

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781947172364

Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Chapter12: Environmental Protection And Negative Externalities

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 33CTQ: Is zero pollution possible under a marketable permits system? Why or why not?

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Q: An externality Select one: a. all answers are correct b. arises when property rights don’t exist or…

A: An externality is the external cost or external benefit incurred or received by an individual who is…

Q: The government auctions off 600 units of pollution rights. The rights sell for $50 per unit, raising…

A: Corrective tax can be calculated by using the following formula.

Q: Consider the issue of cigarette smoking. Please provide brief answers to each of the following…

A: The good which is being under-consumed in a free market due to its short-term view instead of…

Q: Cost-effective pollution control means that... Mark all that applies. Group of answer choices the…

A: Cost Effective Pollution or emission control is defined as the costs that are related with the…

Q: a. What is the efficient outcome (the maximum of total joint profit)? b. What are the outcomes under…

A: Property rights are the rights that provide legal ownership of the resource and decision-making…

Q: 1. When a production externality has a beneficial effect on a bystander at the market equilibrium…

A: Microeconomics refers to the branch of economics in which they deal with the individual instead of…

Q: One reason why a tradable permit system will reduce pollution more efficiently than a…

A: Tradable permits are pollution limits which can be traded in order to create a market in the right…

Q: 4. The advantages of command-and-control environmental regulations used in the 1970's include: a.…

A: Command and Control is one of the many approaches used in public policy. It is a type of…

Q: It's important to note that sometimes private solutions to externalities do not work. For example,…

A: People who are not directly involved in the transactions are frequently impacted by the consumption,…

Q: According to the graph below, which amount represents the most efficient level of pollution that…

A: The most efficient level of pollution that needs to be controlled is obtained at the point where the…

Q: Explain why, in the absence of governmental environmental regulation, competitive markets…

A: Externality is the spillover effect to the third party other than the immediate market participant.…

Q: The graph illustrates the unregulated market for pesticide. When the factories produce pesticide,…

A: Externalities: When a firm produces a good sometimes it creates cost or benefits for other firms. If…

Question

The primary difficulty with command and control pollution regulation is that:

It requires significant information to impose correct limits.

It is costly for regulators to impose.

It does not encourage the best use of abatement technologies.

It has high compliance costs.

All of the above..

Expert Solution

This question has been solved!

Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.

This is a popular solution!

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Step 1

VIEW

Step 2

VIEW

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Similar questions

Economists sometimes shock noneconomists by stating that they do not favor the complete elimination of pollution. Explain the rationale for this position.
B. An advantage of tradable permits over emission taxes is that no knowledge of marginal abatement costs is needed to ensure that the tax rate is optimal. the regulator sets the price of permits. the regulator does not have to determine how much to reduce pollution levels. the regulator must set the optimal tax rate.
Under some conditions, command-and-control pollution standards could be just as good as a cap-and-trade program at bringing about a cost-effective allocation of total abatement responsibility across firms. Furthermore, the regulator could save the cost of running a cap-and-trade program. When would this most likely be the case? a.) If firms have very different technologies, are varying sizes, and there is a mix of older and newer plants, so it is safe to assume that the firms probably have very different marginal abatement cost curves. b.) If all firms have the same types of technologies, are about the same size, and have been in production for approximately the same length of time, so it is safe to assume that each firm’s abatement costs are similar, and the regulator can issue a one-size-fits-all standard. c.) If the regulator gathers detailed information about the technologies employed by every firm so it can figure out each firm’s marginal abatement cost curve. The…
The environmental effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cap-and-trade programs are dependent on: a. how state and federal legislations interact with each other b. how the regulatory authority determines the marginal cost for abating pollution c. how the regulatory authority specifies the cap d. how the regulatory authority monitors the level of emissions
One reason why a tradable permit system will reduce pollution more efficiently than a command-and-control approach is that, under the permit system, we expect: A. Every polluter to reduce pollution equally. B. The polluter with the lowest cost to reduce most of the pollution. C. The polluter with the highest cost to reduce most of the pollution. D.The government to dictate which polluter should reduce the most pollution.
Many economists would consider an efficient level of pollution control to occur where the marginal benefit of reducing pollution is ____________ the marginal cost of reducing pollution. a. greater than b. equal to c. less than
Q)What are economists most concerned with when determining the desirability of pollution abatement programs? a. the expected future costs associated with rising ocean levels b. the future savings to the health-care system from fewer environmental illnesses c. equating the marginal cost and marginal benefit of pollution abatement d. the level of greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles
From the perspective of economists which statement is true: 1.) Benefits estimates for an environmental regulation that will reduce risks to human life probably should depend on the income levels of the people who will be affected by the regulation, despite political pressures to use the identical number for everyone, regardless of their income level. 2.)None of the other statements is correct. 3.) It is wrong to use willingness to pay as a measure of the benefits from a regulation to reduce environmental mortality risks. Rich people will be willing to pay more than poor people for the same reduction in risks. If the cost of the regulation is high, it is possible that the estimated net benefits from the project will be positive for a rich community but negative for a poor community, so only the rich community will get the protection. 4.) Suppose a specific type of environmental regulation, intended to reduce mortality risks, passes a benefit-cost test in the U.S. Then…
Command-and-control regulation may be better thana corrective tax ifa. a corrective tax would have differential effects ondifferent industries.b. some polluters can reduce emissions morecheaply than others.c. the negative externality is so large that theoptimal quantity is zero.d. knowledge about the cost of pollution abatementis dispersed and hard to obtain.
What should the government set their corrective tax to if they want to eliminate 7 units of pollution?
Only typed answer
Which of the following statements about pollution taxes, cap and trade, or command-and-control standards is FALSE? a.) Pollution taxes strictly control the amount of pollution but leave marginal abatement costs to be determined by the market. Cap-and-trade programs strictly control marginal abatement costs but leave the actual amount of pollution to be determined by the overall level of economic activity. b.) Pollution taxes are unpopular in the U.S. because American companies tend to dislike taxes in general. However, pollution taxes offer firms some greater certainty about how large will be their marginal cost of abatement on the last unit of abatement they will need to do, if they are to minimize the costs they incur both for cleanup and for pollution taxes. c.) Both command-and-control pollution standards, and cap-and-trade programs, can effectively limit the total amount of pollution, but command and control will be least-cost only by accident. Usually,…