give the answer and justify it in 3 sentences. The next two questions are based on this information:The journal article (Karstoft et al, 2014) tested the hypothesis thatinterval walking was more effective than continuous walking fortreating type Il diabetes.For all graphs, open bars are before the exercise intervention andblack bars are post-intervention. CON = control; CWT = continuouswalking training; IWT = interval walking training. ***p < 0.001, **p <0.01 within groups (pre vs post), † p<0.05 (CON vs IWT), †† p<0.01(CON vs IWT) and †p<0.05 (CWT vs IWT) Which data set do you think supports their hypothesis? (Pick agraph number)Data set #1Data set #3Fasting Blood Insulin (pmon)CONCWTWTPre-88.8 1 9.8 93.6 a 13.4 96.2 13.0Data set #5Post- 117.1 2 15.6 90.7 = 13.7 76.8 :8.21CON, res CWT, 12 WT, 121.0Data set #2VOmax (mi kg- min-)Data set #40.5CON, He CWT, 12 IWT, 12CONCWTIWT24.821.8 26.121.427.1 a 1.5Pre-Post- 25.2 t 2.0 26.81.9 31.52.2"1tCON ma CNT, m12 WT, m12In graph #3, DI (Disposition index) is an indicator of pancreatic betacell function.In graph #5, CS is Citrate Synthase, a mitochondrial enzyme. CSactivity is proportional to mitochondrial content.GLUTA18SDI (AU)MRNA (AU)

Name: give the answer and justify it in 3 sentences. The next two questions
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T06:38:44.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: give the answer and justify it in 3 sentences. The next two questions are based on this information:The journal article (Karstoft et al, 2014) tested the hypothesis thatinterval walking was more effective than continuous walking fortreating type Il d

Math

Statistics

The next two questions are based on this information: The journal article (Karstoft et al, 2014) tested the hypothesis that interval walking was more effective than continuous walking for treating type II diabetes. For all graphs, open bars are before the exercise intervention and black bars are post-intervention. CON = control; CWT = continuous walking training; IWT = interval walking training. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01 within groups (pre vs post), † p<0.05 (CON vs IWT), †t p<0.01 (CON vs IWT) and * p<0.05 (CWT vs IWT)

The next two questions are based on this information: The journal article (Karstoft et al, 2014) tested the hypothesis that interval walking was more effective than continuous walking for treating type II diabetes. For all graphs, open bars are before the exercise intervention and black bars are post-intervention. CON = control; CWT = continuous walking training; IWT = interval walking training. p < 0.001, p < 0.01 within groups (pre vs post), † p<0.05 (CON vs IWT), †t p<0.01 (CON vs IWT) and p<0.05 (CWT vs IWT)

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Provide complete solution
Determine if the following conditional statement is true or false. if 3 x 8 = 30, then you are the tallest person in the world. True False
If 7 people sit around a table how many ways could they be arragned if 2 people cannot sit together . Provide clear solution
How many ways can the letters in the word PARALLEL be arranged if the letters P and R are together?
please explain step by step, every concept in detail
Please make sure answers are clear n easy to read. Please do it on white paper. Again make sure the answer is clear.
Decide whether or not the following is a statement. 7+2=10
Solve quick
I didn’t understand how to solve these examples. Please help me understanding it step by step.
Q10) I need your help with the question attached. Please show the work done because I need to understand them. Thank you!