The Netherlands abolished its patent system in 1869. What did subsequent innovation in the Netherlands teach us about patents? Since more low-income households started inventing, patents must be an exclusive institution Since fewer women were inventing, patents are an inclusive institution Patents aren't necessary for innovation, but they can affect the types of innovation we get. Without patents, societies become stagnant

The Netherlands abolished its patent system in 1869. What did subsequent innovation in the Netherlands teach us about patents? Since more low-income households started inventing, patents must be an exclusive institution Since fewer women were inventing, patents are an inclusive institution Patents aren't necessary for innovation, but they can affect the types of innovation we get. Without patents, societies become stagnant

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Which of the following are examples of how patents are not always a perfect way to encourage innovation: Group of answer choices patents in the U.S. do not last very long. it is very expensive to apply for a patent not every new idea can be protected with a patent or copyright.
Which of the following is true of antitrust laws in the United States? Group of answer choices Economists unanimously agree on the usefulness of antitrust action to increase the competitiveness of industries. They were embedded in the U.S. Constitution but mostly eliminated in the early 1900s. The Sherman Act in 1980 eliminated and repealed all existing U.S. anti-trust laws. Historically they have been abused by some competitors going after other competitors in ways that are detrimental to consumers.
In many countries, the government chooses to "internalize" the monopoly by owning monopoly providers of goods and services. (In some cases these firms are "nationalized" and the government actually buys or confiscates firms that operate in monopoly markets). Explain TWO advantages and TWO disadvantages of such an approach
Name-Brand Prescription Drugs Market—“Happy Pill”—that greatly improves life but is not essential to life. Using supply and demand analysis, explain what happens to the market price and quantity of a name-brand prescription drug Happy Pill if its patent expires. Using supply and demand analysis explain why Happy Pill might be advertised. Using supply and demand analysis, explain what would happen to the price and quantity of Happy Pills if there was a severe recession, and people lost their jobs, which included a health-care benefit that payed for prescription drugs.
How can countries control Monopoly power using public policy or law?
A pharmaceutical company is the only producer of a particular drug. It sells that drug in two countries, one rich and the other a development country. The inverse demand for the drug in the rich country is pr(qr) = 20 – 2qñ, and in the developing country it is pp(qp) 10- qp. The total cost of production is C(qR, qp) = (qr+qp)². What is the profit-maximizing quantity in the rich country, qR? (a) qR = 1 (b) qR = 3 (c) qR = 6 (d) qR 8 (e) qR 14
Are all markets regulated or deregulated?
Explain the differences in the nature and source of innovation rents and economic rents earned by firms in a differentiated goods market?
Which of the following methods would help society deal with a monopoly? Method Drag appropriate answer(s) here Require the firm to lower the costs so the market price will fall. Regulate the socially efficient price and subsidize any loss to the firm. Increase tariffs on monopoly firms in other countries. Not a Method +# Shut down the firm. Prevent the firm from buying all possible competitors in the market. Drag appropriate answer(s) here +