The managers of a corporation were surveyed to determine the background that leads to a successful manager. Each manager was rated as being either a good, fair, or poor manager by his/ her boss. The manager's background was given. What is the probability the manager has no college background given he is only a fair manager?

A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
10th Edition
ISBN:9780134753119
Author:Sheldon Ross
Publisher:Sheldon Ross
Chapter1: Combinatorial Analysis
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1.1P: a. How many different 7-place license plates are possible if the first 2 places are for letters and...
icon
Related questions
Question

The managers of a corporation were surveyed to determine the background that leads to a successful manager. Each manager was rated as being either a good, fair, or poor manager by his/ her boss. The manager's background was given. What is the probability the manager has no college background given he is only a fair manager?

# Analysis of Managerial Performance Based on Educational Background

A survey was conducted among the managers of a corporation to assess the impact of educational background on perceived managerial performance, categorized as good, fair, or poor, by their superiors. Here is the data collected:

## Managerial Performance Ratings by Educational Background

| Manager Rating | H. S. Degree | Some College | College Degree | Master’s or Ph.D. | Totals |
|----------------|-------------|--------------|----------------|-------------------|--------|
| Good           | 6           | 9            | 21             | 3                 | 39     |
| Fair           | 7           | 12           | 46             | 22                | 87     |
| Poor           | 1           | 3            | 5              | 25                | 34     |
| **Totals**     | **14**      | **24**       | **72**         | **50**            | **160**|

### Explanation

- **H. S. Degree**: Managers with a high school degree had 6 rated as good, 7 as fair, and 1 as poor.
- **Some College**: Managers with some college experience had 9 rated as good, 12 as fair, and 3 as poor.
- **College Degree**: Managers holding a college degree had 21 rated as good, 46 as fair, and 5 as poor.
- **Master’s or Ph.D.**: Managers with a Master’s degree or Ph.D. had 3 rated as good, 22 as fair, and 25 as poor.

### Observations

1. **Overall Performance**: The majority of managers were rated as fair, followed by good, and then poor.
2. **Educational Impact**: College degree holders had the highest number of good ratings, while the Master’s or Ph.D. group had a higher number of poor ratings.
3. **Total Participation**: A total of 160 managerial ratings were recorded across different educational backgrounds.

This data may suggest that while higher education correlates with better performance ratings up to a certain level, it does not necessarily guarantee a good rating beyond college degree level. Further analysis could explore additional factors influencing managerial performance.
Transcribed Image Text:# Analysis of Managerial Performance Based on Educational Background A survey was conducted among the managers of a corporation to assess the impact of educational background on perceived managerial performance, categorized as good, fair, or poor, by their superiors. Here is the data collected: ## Managerial Performance Ratings by Educational Background | Manager Rating | H. S. Degree | Some College | College Degree | Master’s or Ph.D. | Totals | |----------------|-------------|--------------|----------------|-------------------|--------| | Good | 6 | 9 | 21 | 3 | 39 | | Fair | 7 | 12 | 46 | 22 | 87 | | Poor | 1 | 3 | 5 | 25 | 34 | | **Totals** | **14** | **24** | **72** | **50** | **160**| ### Explanation - **H. S. Degree**: Managers with a high school degree had 6 rated as good, 7 as fair, and 1 as poor. - **Some College**: Managers with some college experience had 9 rated as good, 12 as fair, and 3 as poor. - **College Degree**: Managers holding a college degree had 21 rated as good, 46 as fair, and 5 as poor. - **Master’s or Ph.D.**: Managers with a Master’s degree or Ph.D. had 3 rated as good, 22 as fair, and 25 as poor. ### Observations 1. **Overall Performance**: The majority of managers were rated as fair, followed by good, and then poor. 2. **Educational Impact**: College degree holders had the highest number of good ratings, while the Master’s or Ph.D. group had a higher number of poor ratings. 3. **Total Participation**: A total of 160 managerial ratings were recorded across different educational backgrounds. This data may suggest that while higher education correlates with better performance ratings up to a certain level, it does not necessarily guarantee a good rating beyond college degree level. Further analysis could explore additional factors influencing managerial performance.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Research Ethics
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, probability and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
Probability
ISBN:
9780134753119
Author:
Sheldon Ross
Publisher:
PEARSON
A First Course in Probability
A First Course in Probability
Probability
ISBN:
9780321794772
Author:
Sheldon Ross
Publisher:
PEARSON