The IRR evaluation method assumes that cash flows from the project are reinvested at the same rate equal to the IRR. However, in reality the reinvested cash flows may not necessarily generate a return equal to the IRR. Thus, the modified IRR approach makes a more reasonable assumption other than the project's IRR. Consider the following situation: Celestial Crane Cosmetics is analyzing a project that requires an initial investment of $2,500,000. The project's expected cash flows are: Year Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Cash Flow $300,000 -175,000 400,000 400,000 Celestial Crane Cosmetics's WACC is 9%, and the project has the same risk as the firm's average project. Calculate this project's modified internal rate. of return (MIRR):

The IRR evaluation method assumes that cash flows from the project are reinvested at the same rate equal to the IRR. However, in reality the reinvested cash flows may not necessarily generate a return equal to the IRR. Thus, the modified IRR approach makes a more reasonable assumption other than the project's IRR. Consider the following situation: Celestial Crane Cosmetics is analyzing a project that requires an initial investment of $2,500,000. The project's expected cash flows are: Year Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Cash Flow $300,000 -175,000 400,000 400,000 Celestial Crane Cosmetics's WACC is 9%, and the project has the same risk as the firm's average project. Calculate this project's modified internal rate. of return (MIRR):

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

22)
Why is payback often used as the sole method of analyzing a proposed small project? Payback is the most desirable of the various financial methods of analysis. The benefits of payback analysis usually outweigh the costs of the analysis. Payback considers the time value of money. All relevant cash flows are included in the payback analysis. Payback is focused on the long-term impact of a project. OOOO
Overall, you should find conflicting recommendations based on the various criteria. Why is this occuring?
TLT Ltd is considering the purchase of a new machine for use in its production process. Management has developed three alternative proposals to help evaluate the machine purchase. Only one of these proposals can be implemented. Proposals A and B both have the same cost to set up, but the output from proposal A (as measured by future net cash flows) commences at a high rate and then declines over time, while Proposal B starts at a low rate and then increases over time. Proposal C involves buying two of the machines considered under proposal B. That is, proposal C is simply Proposal B scaled by a factor of two. Proposal C results in net cash flows which are similar in magnitude to proposal A's net cash flows in the first two years. The estimated net cash flows, internal rates of return and net present values at 9% and 11% for each proposal are given in the following table. Proposal A -$290,000 $100,000 $90,000 Proposal B -$290,000 $40,000 $50,000 Proposal C -$580,000 $80,000 $100,000 End…
Newtown Corp. has to choose between two mutually exclusive projects. If it chooses project A, Newtown Corp. will have the opportunity to make a similar investment in three years. However, if it chooses project B, it will not have the opportunity to make a second investment. The following table lists the cash flows for these projects. If the firm uses the replacement chain (common life) approach, what will be the difference between the net present value (NPV) of project A and project B, assuming that both projects have a weighted average cost of capital of 12%? Cash Flow Project A Project B Year 0: –$15,000 Year 0: –$40,000 Year 1: 9,000 Year 1: 8,000 Year 2: 15,000 Year 2: 15,000 Year 3: 14,000 Year 3: 14,000 Year 4: 13,000 Year 5: 12,000 Year 6: 11,000 $13,512 $11,923 $15,897 $12,718 $10,333 Newtown Corp. is considering a five-year project that has a weighted average cost of capital of…
Which of the following statements is true regarding the payback period? Multiple Choice It measures the length of time that it takes for a project to recover its initial cost from the discounted net cash inflows that it genera It measures the length of time that it takes for a project to recover its initial cost from the net cash inflows that it generates. It measures the length of time that it takes for a project to recover its initial cost from the incremental net operating income that It measures the length of time that it takes for a project to recover its initial cost from the discounted incremental net operating it generates.
Which of the following statements is CORRECT? Assume that the project being considered has normal cash flows, with one outflow followed by a series of inflows. The lower the WACC used to calculate a project's NPV, the lower the calculated NPV will be. If a project's NPV is less than zero, then its IRR must be less than the WACC. If a project's NPV is greater than zero, then its IRR must be less than zero. The NPV of a relatively low-risk project should be found using a relatively high WACC. A project's NPV is found by compounding the cash inflows at the IRR to find the terminal value (TV), then discounting the TV at the WACC. 000o
Modified internal rate of return (MIRR) The IRR evaluation method assumes that cash flows from the project are reinvested at the same rate equal to the IRR. However, in reality the reinvested cash flows may not necessarily generate a return equal to the IRR. Thus, the modified IRR approach makes a more reasonable assumption other than the project’s IRR. Consider the following situation: Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc. is analyzing a project that requires an initial investment of $2,225,000. The project’s expected cash flows are: Year Cash Flow Year 1 $350,000 Year 2 –125,000 Year 3 450,000 Year 4 450,000 Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc.’s WACC is 7%, and the project has the same risk as the firm’s average project. Calculate this project’s modified internal rate of return (MIRR): -12.63% 26.46% 30.64% 29.24% If Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc.’s managers select projects based on the MIRR criterion,…
he IRR evaluation method assumes that cash flows from the project are reinvested at the same rate equal to the IRR. However, in reality the reinvested cash flows may not necessarily generate a return equal to the IRR. Thus, the modified IRR approach makes a more reasonable assumption other than the project’s IRR. Consider the following situation: Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc. is analyzing a project that requires an initial investment of $3,000,000. The project’s expected cash flows are: Year Cash Flow Year 1 $275,000 Year 2 –150,000 Year 3 475,000 Year 4 400,000 Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc.’s WACC is 8%, and the project has the same risk as the firm’s average project. Calculate this project’s modified internal rate of return (MIRR): 15.88% 14.21% 18.39% -20.35% If Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc.’s managers select projects based on the MIRR criterion, they should this independent project.…
Garden-Grow Products is considering a new investment whose data are shown below. The equipment would be depreciated on a straight-line basis over the project's 3-year life, would have a zero salvage value, and would require some additional working capital that would be recovered at the end of the project's life. Revenues and other operating costs are expected to be constant over the project's life. What is the project's NPV? (Hint: Cash flows are constant in Years 1 to 3.) Project cost of capital (r) Net investment in fixed assets (basis) Required new working capital Straight-line deprec. rate Sales revenues, each year Operating costs (excl. deprec.), each year Tax rate a. $31,573 b. $30,069 c. $36,550 d. $34,809 e. $33,152 10.0% $75,000 $15,000 33.333% $75,000 $25,000 25.0%
4. Modified internal rate of return (MIRR) The IRR evaluation method assumes that cash flows from the project are reinvested at the same rate equal to the IRR However, in reality the reinvested cash flows may not necessarily generate a return equal to the IRR. Thus, the modified IRR approach makes a more reasonable assumption other than the project's IRR Consider the following situation: Cold Goose Metal Works Inc. is analyzing a project that requires an initial investment of $600,000. The project's expected cash flows are: Year Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Cold Goose Metal Works Inc.'s WACC is 7%, and the project has the same risk as the firm's average project. Calculate this project's modified internal rate of return (MIRR): 17.50% 14.00% Cash Flow $350,000 -100,000 450,000 400,000 19.25%
A company considering a project with extremely risky cash flows decides to apply a premium to the discount rate used to evaluate the project. The management of the company has set the following limits regarding the use of premia on discount rates: If the CV of the project is less than 1, no premium is added. If the CV of the project is 1 or more, but less than 1.5, the discount rate is multiplied by 1.5 If the CV of the project is 1.5 or more, the discount rate is multiplied by 2. The project under consideration has a CV of 1.5 while the company’s WACC is 10%. What would the discount rate employed to evaluate the project be?