The international system is said to be one of anarchy. What does this mean? What are the implications of anarchy for the way international actors behave? Has anarchy and the related notion of sovereignty changed over time? If so, what is different today compared to past eras?

icon
Related questions
Question

 

The international system is said to be one of anarchy. What does this mean? What are the implications of anarchy for the way international actors behave? Has anarchy and the related notion of sovereignty changed over time? If so, what is different today compared to past eras? Can any of the theoretical perspectives we’ve covered (realism, liberalism, or constructivism) explain these changes?

 

 

Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer