The international system is said to be one of anarchy. What does this mean? What are the implications of anarchy for the way international actors behave? Has anarchy and the related notion of sovereignty changed over time? If so, what is different today compared to past eras?
The international system is said to be one of anarchy. What does this mean? What are the implications of anarchy for the way international actors behave? Has anarchy and the related notion of sovereignty changed over time? If so, what is different today compared to past eras?
Related questions
Question
The international system is said to be one of anarchy. What does this mean? What are the implications of anarchy for the way international actors behave? Has anarchy and the related notion of sovereignty changed over time? If so, what is different today compared to past eras? Can any of the theoretical perspectives we’ve covered (realism, liberalism, or constructivism) explain these changes?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps