The internal rate of return (IRR) refers to the compound annual rate of return that a project generates based on its up-front cost and subsequent cash flows. Consider the case of Blue Llama Mining Company: Blue Llama Mining Company is evaluating a proposed capital budgeting project (project Sigma) that will require an initial investment of $800,000. Blue Llama Mining Company has been basing capital budgeting decisions on a project’s NPV; however, its new CFO wants to start using the IRR method for capital budgeting decisions. The CFO says that the IRR is a better method because returns in percentage form are easier to understand and compare to required returns. Blue Llama Mining Company’s WACC is 7%, and project Sigma has the same risk as the firm’s average project. The project is expected to generate the following net cash flows: Year Cash Flow Year 1 $375,000 Year 2 $500,000 Year 3 $425,000 Year 4 $500,000 Which of the following is the correct calculation of project Sigma’s IRR? If this is an independent project, the IRR method states that the firm should . If mutually exclusive projects are proposed that both have an IRR greater than the necessary WACC, the IRR method states that the firm should accept: A. The project with the greatest IRR, assuming that both projects have the same risk as the firm’s average project B. The project with the greater future cash inflows, assuming that both projects have the same risk as the firm’s average project C. The project that requires the lowest initial investment, assuming that both projects have the same risk as the firm’s average project
The internal rate of return (IRR) refers to the compound annual rate of return that a project generates based on its up-front cost and subsequent cash flows. Consider the case of Blue Llama Mining Company: Blue Llama Mining Company is evaluating a proposed capital budgeting project (project Sigma) that will require an initial investment of $800,000. Blue Llama Mining Company has been basing capital budgeting decisions on a project’s NPV; however, its new CFO wants to start using the IRR method for capital budgeting decisions. The CFO says that the IRR is a better method because returns in percentage form are easier to understand and compare to required returns. Blue Llama Mining Company’s WACC is 7%, and project Sigma has the same risk as the firm’s average project. The project is expected to generate the following net cash flows: Year Cash Flow Year 1 $375,000 Year 2 $500,000 Year 3 $425,000 Year 4 $500,000 Which of the following is the correct calculation of project Sigma’s IRR? If this is an independent project, the IRR method states that the firm should . If mutually exclusive projects are proposed that both have an IRR greater than the necessary WACC, the IRR method states that the firm should accept: A. The project with the greatest IRR, assuming that both projects have the same risk as the firm’s average project B. The project with the greater future cash inflows, assuming that both projects have the same risk as the firm’s average project C. The project that requires the lowest initial investment, assuming that both projects have the same risk as the firm’s average project
Essentials Of Investments
11th Edition
ISBN:9781260013924
Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Chapter1: Investments: Background And Issues
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1PS
Related questions
Question
The internal rate of return (IRR) refers to the compound annual rate of return that a project generates based on its up-front cost and subsequent cash flows. Consider the case of Blue Llama Mining Company:
Blue Llama Mining Company is evaluating a proposed capital budgeting project (project Sigma) that will require an initial investment of $800,000.
Blue Llama Mining Company has been basing capital budgeting decisions on a project’s NPV; however, its new CFO wants to start using the IRR method for capital budgeting decisions. The CFO says that the IRR is a better method because returns in percentage form are easier to understand and compare to required returns. Blue Llama Mining Company’s WACC is 7%, and project Sigma has the same risk as the firm’s average project.
The project is expected to generate the following net cash flows:
|
Year
|
Cash Flow
|
|---|---|
| Year 1 | $375,000 |
| Year 2 | $500,000 |
| Year 3 | $425,000 |
| Year 4 | $500,000 |
Which of the following is the correct calculation of project Sigma’s IRR?
If this is an independent project, the IRR method states that the firm should .
If mutually exclusive projects are proposed that both have an IRR greater than the necessary WACC, the IRR method states that the firm should accept:
A. The project with the greatest IRR, assuming that both projects have the same risk as the firm’s average project
B. The project with the greater future cash inflows , assuming that both projects have the same risk as the firm’s average project
C. The project that requires the lowest initial investment, assuming that both projects have the same risk as the firm’s average project
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 2 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, finance and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Essentials Of Investments
Finance
ISBN:
9781260013924
Author:
Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:
Mcgraw-hill Education,
Essentials Of Investments
Finance
ISBN:
9781260013924
Author:
Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:
Mcgraw-hill Education,
Foundations Of Finance
Finance
ISBN:
9780134897264
Author:
KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. William
Publisher:
Pearson,
Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou…
Finance
ISBN:
9781337395250
Author:
Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i…
Finance
ISBN:
9780077861759
Author:
Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan Professor
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education