The following three mutually exclusive alternative proposals are being considered for flood proofing a factory building that is located in an area subject to occasional flooding by nearby river. 1. Do nothing: Damage to the building in a moderate flood is $11,000 and in a severe flood it is $24,000. 2. Protect the building with a one-time initial expenditure of $20,000 so that the building can withstand moderate flooding without any damage and withstand severe flooding wit only a $10,000 damage. 3. Protect the building with a one-time initial expenditure of $32,000 so that the building can withstand any flooding with no damage at all. In any year, there is a 19% probability of moderate flooding and a 9% probability of severe flooding. Using a MARR of 6% per year and a service life of 8 years, determine which the three alternatives is the most economical. (a) Calculate EUAC values for each scenario (use negative numbers for costs) The expected EUAC for the "Do Nothing" alternative is $ The expected EUAC for Alternative 2 is $ (Round to the nearest whole number.) The EUAC for Alternative 3 is $ (Round to the nearest whole number.) (b) The most economical alternative is O A. Do nothing OB. Alternative 3. OC. Alternative 2 (Round to the nearest whole number.)
The following three mutually exclusive alternative proposals are being considered for flood proofing a factory building that is located in an area subject to occasional flooding by nearby river. 1. Do nothing: Damage to the building in a moderate flood is $11,000 and in a severe flood it is $24,000. 2. Protect the building with a one-time initial expenditure of $20,000 so that the building can withstand moderate flooding without any damage and withstand severe flooding wit only a $10,000 damage. 3. Protect the building with a one-time initial expenditure of $32,000 so that the building can withstand any flooding with no damage at all. In any year, there is a 19% probability of moderate flooding and a 9% probability of severe flooding. Using a MARR of 6% per year and a service life of 8 years, determine which the three alternatives is the most economical. (a) Calculate EUAC values for each scenario (use negative numbers for costs) The expected EUAC for the "Do Nothing" alternative is $ The expected EUAC for Alternative 2 is $ (Round to the nearest whole number.) The EUAC for Alternative 3 is $ (Round to the nearest whole number.) (b) The most economical alternative is O A. Do nothing OB. Alternative 3. OC. Alternative 2 (Round to the nearest whole number.)
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
Related questions
Question
Transcribed Image Text:The following three mutually exclusive alternative proposals are being considered for flood proofing a factory building that is located in an area subject to occasional flooding by a
nearby river.
1. Do nothing: Damage to the building in a moderate flood is $11,000 and in a severe flood it is $24,000.
2. Protect the building with a one-time initial expenditure of $20,000 so that the building can withstand moderate flooding without any damage and withstand severe flooding with
only a $10,000 damage.
3. Protect the building with a one-time initial expenditure of $32,000 so that the building can withstand any flooding with no damage at all.
In any year, there is a 19% probability of moderate flooding and a 9% probability of severe flooding. Using a MARR of 6% per year and a service life of 8 years, determine which of
the three alternatives is the most economical.
(a) Calculate EUAC values for each scenario (use negative numbers for costs)
The expected EUAC for the "Do Nothing" alternative is $ (Round to the nearest whole number.)
The expected EUAC for Alternative 2 is $ (Round to the nearest whole number.)
The EUAC for Alternative 3 is $ (Round
to the nearest whole number.)
(b) The most economical alternative is
OA. Do nothing
B. Alternative 3
OC. Alternative 2
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education