The following table of values gives a company's annual profits in millions of dollars. Rescale the data so that the year 2005 corresponds to x = 0. Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Profits (in millions of dollars) 51.8 63.4 66.3 65.8 62.1 63.8 Find the exponential regression model for this data.

The following table of values gives a company's annual profits in millions of dollars. Rescale the data so that the year 2005 corresponds to x = 0. Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Profits (in millions of dollars) 51.8 63.4 66.3 65.8 62.1 63.8 Find the exponential regression model for this data.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The following table shows the reported net sales by Nokia in 2008, 2009, and 2010. Year 2008 2009 2010x 0 1 2Sales ($ millions) 20 50 60 Find the Equation of the Linear Regression Line. Rounds decimal values to the nearest tenths.
What is the dollar amount of change in sales for each new year according to the regression (slope) model? Do not use commas or $ in your answer.
The table below shows the value, V, of an investment (in dollars) n years after 1992. 1 3 7 4120 4283 4919 12 14 5874 6050 n V(n) 6663 Use your calculator to determine the exponential regression equation that models the set of data above. Round the "a" value to the nearest whole number, and round the "b" value to three decimals. Use the indicated variables and proper function notation. V(n) Based on the your regression model, what is the percent increase per year? The value of this investment is increasing at a rate of % per year. Based the your regression model, what is value of this investment in the year 1992? Round your answer to the nearest dollar. The value of this investment is $ in the year 1992. Based on the your regression model, what is value of this investment in the year 2002? Round your answer to the nearest dollar. The value of this investment is S in the year 2002.
The data show the chest size and weight of several bears. Find the regression equation, letting chest size be the independent (x) variable. Then find the best predicted weight of a bear with a chest size of 40 inches. Is the result close to the actual weight of 352 pounds? Use a significance level of 0.05. Chest size (inches) *Weight (pounds) 44 54 328 528 41 55 39 51 418 580 296 503 Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r. - What is the regression equation? x (Round to one decimal place as needed.)
Determine the exponential regression of the data below using either a calculator or spreadsheet program. Then, estimate the x value when the y value is 5.2. Round your answer to one decimal place. (−4.7,10.7),(−7.8,20.6),(−10.5,30.2),(−15.6,41),(−20.8,56.1),(−22,65.1)
ý Ao v = 2 The table below shows the number of new stores in a coffee shop chain that opened during the years 1986 through 1994. Number of New Stores Year 14 1986 1087 27 1900 46 1989 80 1990 110 1991 153 1902 261 1993 403 1994 601 Using x represent the number of new stores, write the exponential regression equation for these data. Round ell values to the nearest thousandth I to represent the year 1986 and y to
For half-life demonstration, plot ln(half-lives) in the x-axis vs ln(no. of “tails-up” coins) in the y-axis. Perform linear regression to obtain the value of the slope, the value of the y-intercept, and the correlation coefficient r. What is the significance of these values?
Table 3 gives the market value of a luxury sedan (in dollars) xyears after its purchase. Find an exponential regression model of the form y= ab* for this data set. Estimate the purchase price of the sedan. Estimate the value of the sedan 10 years after its purchase. Round answers to the nearest dollar. TABLE 3 Value ($) 1 23,125 19,050 3 15,625 11,875 5 9,450 6 7,125 2.
Perform a linear regression analysis on the following data and determine the "a" coefficient (i.e., slope): Y 4.99 22.19 1.96 9.89 2.98 11 9 40.46 4.04 18.93 6.06 25 0.88 0.19 8.02 34.02 6.97 28.03
Find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Find the best predicted Nobel Laureate rate for a country that has 79.4 Internet users per 100 people. How does it compare to the country's actual Nobel Laureate rate of 1.2 per 10 million people? Internet Users Per 100 Nobel Laureates 79.3 5.6 80.5 24.2 78.8 8.7 45.2 0.1 82.5 6.2 38 0.1 90.3 25.4 88.6 7.6 80.3 9.1 83.1 12.6 53.3 1.9 76.3 12.7 56.6 3.3 78.5 1.5 91.6 11.5 93.4 25.2 65.3 3.1 57.3 1.9 68.2 1.7 94.8 31.6 85.4 31.3 86.4 19.1 78.3 10.9 2) Check Image
Find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Using the listed actress/actor ages in various years, find the best predicted age of the Best Actor winner given that the age of the Best Actress winner that year is 31 years. Is the result within 5 years of the actual Best Actor winner, whose age was 38 years? Best Actress Best Actor 27 31 29 59 33 42 38 36 43 53 34 47 22 46 55 39 57 45 33 44 28 63 62 49 *** Find the equation of the regression line. ŷ=0+0x (Round the y-intercept to one decimal place as needed. Round the slope to three decimal places as needed.)
Using the data, run a regression where you control for “Promotion,” and test the effect of “Wins” on “Attendance”. Does “Promotion” have a significant effect on “Attendance”? Wins Promotion Attendance 4 29500 36300 6 55700 40100 6 71300 41200 8 87000 53000 6 75000 44000 7 72000 45600 5 55300 39000 7 81600 47500