The federal government is considering closing down a substantial portion of the John Day Fossil Beds in Oregon and selling the land to private interests. In considering this policy, economists advise the government to choose the option that has the highest net present value. They consider costs and benefits into the infinite future.Closing the fossil beds provides an immediate $3 million from the sale of the land andan annual savings of $100,000 in reduced maintenance costs. However, recreational users and conservationists no longer derive any benefit from the land, losing $500,000in benefits annually. a) If the discount rate is r = 2.5%, are the benefits of closing the monument larger than the costs?
The federal government is considering closing down a substantial portion of the John Day Fossil Beds in Oregon and selling the land to private interests. In considering this policy, economists advise the government to choose the option that has the highest net present value. They consider costs and benefits into the infinite future.Closing the fossil beds provides an immediate $3 million from the sale of the land andan annual savings of $100,000 in reduced maintenance costs. However, recreational users and conservationists no longer derive any benefit from the land, losing $500,000in benefits annually. a) If the discount rate is r = 2.5%, are the benefits of closing the monument larger than the costs?
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
Related questions
Question

Transcribed Image Text:The federal government is considering closing down a
substantial portion of the John Day Fossil Beds in
Oregon and selling the land to private interests. In
considering this policy, economists advise the
government to choose the option that has the highest
net present value. They consider costs and benefits into
the infinite future.Closing the fossil beds provides an
immediate $3 million from the sale of the land andan
annual savings of $100,000 in reduced maintenance
costs. However, recreational users and conservationists
no longer derive any benefit from the land, losing
$500,000in benefits annually.
a) If the discount rate is r = 2.5%, are the benefits of
closing the monument larger than the costs?
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps

Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you


Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON


Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education