The efficiency for a steel specimen immersed in a phosphating tank is the weight of the phosphate coating divided by the metal loss (both in mg/ft²). An article gave the accompanying data on tank temperature (x) and efficiency ratio (y). Temp. 173 175 y = Ratio Ratio Temp. 183 183 183 1.47 1.70 1.67 Temp. Ratio 176 0.88 1.37 1.40 0.97 1.09 185 185 185 (185, 1.98) (185, 2.74) 177 1.89 1.98 2.74 183 177 187 178 0.98 183. 184 179 1.00 1.70 184 180 2.15 2.11 0.90 1.53 0.80 187 188 189 1.51 2.56 3.02 1.77 185 191 (a) Determine the equation of the estimated regression line. (Round all numerical values to four decimal places.) 3.16 (b) Calculate a point estimate for true average efficiency ratio when tank temperature is 185. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) (c) Calculate the values of the residuals from the least squares line for the four observations for which temperature is 185. (Round your answers to two decimal places.) (185, 0.80) (185, 1.89) Why do they not all have the same sign? O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the cases of the first two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were smaller than the predicted value. In the cases of the last two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were larger than the predicted value. O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the cases of the first two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were larger than the predicted value. In the cases of the last two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were smaller than the predicted value. O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the case of the second pair of observations, the observed efficiency ratio was equal to the predicted value. In the cases of the other pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were larger than the predicted value. O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the case of the third pair of observations, the observed efficiency ratio was equal to the predicted value. In the cases of the other pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were smaller than the predicted value. (d) What proportion of the observed variation in efficiency ratio can be attributed to the simple linear regression relationship between the two variables? (Round your answer to three decimal places.)
The efficiency for a steel specimen immersed in a phosphating tank is the weight of the phosphate coating divided by the metal loss (both in mg/ft²). An article gave the accompanying data on tank temperature (x) and efficiency ratio (y). Temp. 173 175 y = Ratio Ratio Temp. 183 183 183 1.47 1.70 1.67 Temp. Ratio 176 0.88 1.37 1.40 0.97 1.09 185 185 185 (185, 1.98) (185, 2.74) 177 1.89 1.98 2.74 183 177 187 178 0.98 183. 184 179 1.00 1.70 184 180 2.15 2.11 0.90 1.53 0.80 187 188 189 1.51 2.56 3.02 1.77 185 191 (a) Determine the equation of the estimated regression line. (Round all numerical values to four decimal places.) 3.16 (b) Calculate a point estimate for true average efficiency ratio when tank temperature is 185. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) (c) Calculate the values of the residuals from the least squares line for the four observations for which temperature is 185. (Round your answers to two decimal places.) (185, 0.80) (185, 1.89) Why do they not all have the same sign? O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the cases of the first two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were smaller than the predicted value. In the cases of the last two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were larger than the predicted value. O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the cases of the first two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were larger than the predicted value. In the cases of the last two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were smaller than the predicted value. O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the case of the second pair of observations, the observed efficiency ratio was equal to the predicted value. In the cases of the other pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were larger than the predicted value. O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the case of the third pair of observations, the observed efficiency ratio was equal to the predicted value. In the cases of the other pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were smaller than the predicted value. (d) What proportion of the observed variation in efficiency ratio can be attributed to the simple linear regression relationship between the two variables? (Round your answer to three decimal places.)
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question

Transcribed Image Text:The efficiency for a steel specimen immersed in a phosphating tank is the weight of the phosphate coating divided by the metal loss (both in mg/ft²). An article gave the accompanying data on tank temperature (x) and efficiency ratio
(y).
Temp. 173
y =
Ratio
Temp. 183
Ratio
175 176
Ratio
183 183
1.47 1.70 1.67
177
177
0.88 1.37 1.40 0.97 1.09 0.98 1.00 1.70
183 183
2.15
Temp. 185 185 185 187
2.11
178
187
184
179
0.90
184
180
1.53
185
0.80
188 189 191
1.89 1.98 2.74 1.51 2.56 3.02 1.77 3.16
(a) Determine the equation of the estimated regression line. (Round all numerical values to four decimal places.)
(b) Calculate a point estimate for true average efficiency ratio when tank temperature is 185. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
(c) Calculate the values of the residuals from the least squares line for the four observations for which temperature is 185. (Round your answers to two decimal places.)
(185, 0.80)
(185, 1.89)
(185, 1.98)
(185, 2.74)
Why do they not all have the same sign?
O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the cases of the first two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were smaller than the predicted value. In the cases of the last two pairs of observations,
the observed efficiency ratios were larger than the predicted value.
O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the cases of the first two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were larger than the predicted value. In the cases of the last two pairs of observations,
the observed efficiency ratios were smaller than the predicted value.
O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the case of the second pair of observations, the observed efficiency ratio was equal to the predicted value. In the cases of the other pairs of observations, the observed
efficiency ratios were larger than the predicted value.
O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the case of the third pair of observations, the observed efficiency ratio was equal to the predicted value. In the cases of the other pairs of observations, the observed
efficiency ratios were smaller than the predicted value.
(d) What proportion of the observed variation in efficiency ratio can be attributed to the simple linear regression relationship between the two variables? (Round your answer to three decimal places.)
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step 1: Write the given information.
VIEWStep 2: Construct the table and determine the regression equation.
VIEWStep 3: Determine the point estimate for true average efficiency ratio when tank temperature is 185.
VIEWStep 4: Determine the values of residual from the least squares line for the four observations.
VIEWStep 5: Determine proportion of observed variation in efficiency ratio attributed to the linear regression.
VIEWSolution
VIEWStep by step
Solved in 6 steps with 15 images

Recommended textbooks for you

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON

The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman

Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman