The efficiency for a steel specimen immersed in a phosphating tank is the weight of the phosphate coating divided by the metal loss (both in mg/tt). An article gave the accompanying data on tank temperature (x) and efficiency ratio (y). 176 177 178 Ratio 0.90 1.25 1.32 0.97 1.05 1.18 1.06 Temp. 171 y= 173 174 175 175 Temp. 181 181 181 181 181 182 182 183 Ratio 1.49 1.68 1.51 2.19 2.17 0.78 1.33 1.00 USE SALT 1.86 Temp. 183 183 183 185 185 186 187 189 Ratio 1.77 1.98 2.78 1.45 2.54 3.08 1.89 3.16 (a) Determine the equation of the estimated regression line. (Round all numerical values to four decimal places.) (b) Calculate a point estimate for true average efficiency ratio when tank temperature is 183. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) (d) What pron (c) Calculate the values of the residuals from the least squares line for the four observations for which temperature is 183. (Round your answers to two decimal places.) (183, 1.00) (183, 1.77) (183, 1.98) (183, 2.78) Why do they not all have the same sign? O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the cases of the first two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were smaller than the predicted value. In the cases of the last two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were larger than the predicted val O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the cases of the first two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were larger than the predicted value. In the cases of the last two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were smaller than the predicted value. O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the case of the second pair of observations, the observed efficiency ratio was equal to the predicted value. In the cases of the other pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were larger than the predicted value. O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the case of the third pair of observations, the observed efficiency ratio was equal to the predicted value. In the cases of the other pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were smaller than the predicted value. f the obcensed undation in efficiency ratio can be attributed to the simple Enesc coprescin relationshin imal places)

A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
10th Edition
ISBN:9780134753119
Author:Sheldon Ross
Publisher:Sheldon Ross
Chapter1: Combinatorial Analysis
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1.1P: a. How many different 7-place license plates are possible if the first 2 places are for letters and...
icon
Related questions
Question

Help me with this problem please.

The efficiency for a steel specimen immersed in a phosphating tank is the weight of the phosphate coating divided by the metal loss (both in mg/ft2). An article gave the accompanying data on tank temperature (x) and efficiency ratio (y).
Temp. 171
y =
Temp. 181
173
174
181
USE SALT
175
Ratio 0.90 1.25 1.32 0.97 1.05 1.18 1.06 1.86
181 181
Ratio 1.49 1.68 1.51 2.19
175
176
181 182
2.17 0.78
Temp. 183 183
183 185 185
Ratio 1.77 1.98 2.78 1.45 2.54 3.08
177
186
178
182
183
1.33 1.00
187 189
1.89 3.16
(a) Determine the equation of the estimated regression line. (Round all numerical values to four decimal places.)
(b) Calculate a point estimate for true average efficiency ratio when tank temperature is 183. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
(c) Calculate the values of the residuals from the least squares line for the four observations for which temperature is 183. (Round your answers to two decimal places.)
(183, 1.00)
(183, 1.77)
(183, 1.98)
(183, 2.78)
Why do they not all have the same sign?
O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the cases of the first two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were smaller than the predicted value. In the cases of the last two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were larger than the predicted value.
O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the cases of the first two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were larger than the predicted value. In the cases of the last two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were smaller than the predicted
value.
O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the case of the second pair of observations, the observed efficiency ratio was equal to the predicted value. In the cases of the other pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were larger than the predicted value.
O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the case of the third pair of observations, the observed efficiency ratio was equal to the predicted value. In the cases of the other pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were smaller than the predicted value.
(d) What proportion of the observed variation in efficiency ratio can be attributed to the simple linear regression relationship between the two variables? (Round your answer to three decimal places.)
Transcribed Image Text:The efficiency for a steel specimen immersed in a phosphating tank is the weight of the phosphate coating divided by the metal loss (both in mg/ft2). An article gave the accompanying data on tank temperature (x) and efficiency ratio (y). Temp. 171 y = Temp. 181 173 174 181 USE SALT 175 Ratio 0.90 1.25 1.32 0.97 1.05 1.18 1.06 1.86 181 181 Ratio 1.49 1.68 1.51 2.19 175 176 181 182 2.17 0.78 Temp. 183 183 183 185 185 Ratio 1.77 1.98 2.78 1.45 2.54 3.08 177 186 178 182 183 1.33 1.00 187 189 1.89 3.16 (a) Determine the equation of the estimated regression line. (Round all numerical values to four decimal places.) (b) Calculate a point estimate for true average efficiency ratio when tank temperature is 183. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) (c) Calculate the values of the residuals from the least squares line for the four observations for which temperature is 183. (Round your answers to two decimal places.) (183, 1.00) (183, 1.77) (183, 1.98) (183, 2.78) Why do they not all have the same sign? O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the cases of the first two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were smaller than the predicted value. In the cases of the last two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were larger than the predicted value. O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the cases of the first two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were larger than the predicted value. In the cases of the last two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were smaller than the predicted value. O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the case of the second pair of observations, the observed efficiency ratio was equal to the predicted value. In the cases of the other pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were larger than the predicted value. O These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the case of the third pair of observations, the observed efficiency ratio was equal to the predicted value. In the cases of the other pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were smaller than the predicted value. (d) What proportion of the observed variation in efficiency ratio can be attributed to the simple linear regression relationship between the two variables? (Round your answer to three decimal places.)
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
Probability
ISBN:
9780134753119
Author:
Sheldon Ross
Publisher:
PEARSON
A First Course in Probability
A First Course in Probability
Probability
ISBN:
9780321794772
Author:
Sheldon Ross
Publisher:
PEARSON