Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Statistics
The efficacy of two kinds of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in relation to a clinical population were compared. The therapies differed on the dimension of how wedded they were to the rational-emotive behavioral therapy (REBT), a subtype of CBT that emphasizes a directive, confrontational approach to encourage a patient to recognize the irrationality of specific thought patterns. Forty adolescents at an inpatient clinic for treatment of self-destructive behaviors were randomly divided into two groups of equal size, one of which received the less challenging type of CBT (Treatment A) and one of which received the more challenging kind of CBT (Treatment B). All patients were treated by trained therapists in one-on-one sessions for 1.5 hours per day (broken down into 45-minute sessions) for six weeks. All participants were apprised that they were part of a study, all participants signed consent forms, and all were told they would be informed of the results at its conclusion; participants exhibiting any behaviors that required critical intervention were promptly treated outside the plan of the study. Outcome data on the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist (RBPC)-PAR Edition* collected at the conclusion of six weeks as shown below Jalse f.

The efficacy of two kinds of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in relation to a clinical population were compared. The therapies differed on the dimension of how wedded they were to the rational-emotive behavioral therapy (REBT), a subtype of CBT that emphasizes a directive, confrontational approach to encourage a patient to recognize the irrationality of specific thought patterns. Forty adolescents at an inpatient clinic for treatment of self-destructive behaviors were randomly divided into two groups of equal size, one of which received the less challenging type of CBT (Treatment A) and one of which received the more challenging kind of CBT (Treatment B). All patients were treated by trained therapists in one-on-one sessions for 1.5 hours per day (broken down into 45-minute sessions) for six weeks. All participants were apprised that they were part of a study, all participants signed consent forms, and all were told they would be informed of the results at its conclusion; participants exhibiting any behaviors that required critical intervention were promptly treated outside the plan of the study. Outcome data on the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist (RBPC)-PAR Edition* collected at the conclusion of six weeks as shown below Jalse f.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
Which statistical procedure would be the best way to solve this analysis?
+ Automatic Zoom The efficacy of two kinds of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in relation to a clinical population were compared. The therapies differed on the dimension of how wedded they were to the rational-emotive behavioral therapy (REBT), a subtype of CBT that emphasizes a directive, confrontational approach to encourage a patient to recognize the irrationality of specific thought patterns. Forty adolescents at an inpatient clinic for treatment of self-destructive behaviors were randomly divided into two groups of equal size, one of which received the less challenging type of CBT (Treatment A) and one of which received the more challenging kind of CBT (Treatment B). All patients were treated by trained therapists in one-on-one sessions for 1.5 hours per day (broken down into 45-minute sessions) for six weeks. All participants were apprised that they were part of a study, all participants signed consent forms, and all were told they would be informed of the results at its conclusion; participants exhibiting any behaviors that required critical intervention were promptly treated outside the plan of the study. Outcome data on the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist (RBPC)-PAR Edition* collected at the conclusion of six weeks as shown below (also found in the Data Set Scenario 3 Excel file). Treatment A Treatment B 74 80 50 82 70 49 60 44 30 60 37 65 34 77 40 45 39 51 70 70 19 53 43 16 25 38 15 44 20 29 55 51 48 54 42 46 60 18 27 61 Instrument has been validated for use with the population under consideration. O search op
Transcribed Image Text:+ Automatic Zoom The efficacy of two kinds of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in relation to a clinical population were compared. The therapies differed on the dimension of how wedded they were to the rational-emotive behavioral therapy (REBT), a subtype of CBT that emphasizes a directive, confrontational approach to encourage a patient to recognize the irrationality of specific thought patterns. Forty adolescents at an inpatient clinic for treatment of self-destructive behaviors were randomly divided into two groups of equal size, one of which received the less challenging type of CBT (Treatment A) and one of which received the more challenging kind of CBT (Treatment B). All patients were treated by trained therapists in one-on-one sessions for 1.5 hours per day (broken down into 45-minute sessions) for six weeks. All participants were apprised that they were part of a study, all participants signed consent forms, and all were told they would be informed of the results at its conclusion; participants exhibiting any behaviors that required critical intervention were promptly treated outside the plan of the study. Outcome data on the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist (RBPC)-PAR Edition* collected at the conclusion of six weeks as shown below (also found in the Data Set Scenario 3 Excel file). Treatment A Treatment B 74 80 50 82 70 49 60 44 30 60 37 65 34 77 40 45 39 51 70 70 19 53 43 16 25 38 15 44 20 29 55 51 48 54 42 46 60 18 27 61 Instrument has been validated for use with the population under consideration. O search op
group of measurements. 1. Does the research question for your data set indicate (a) there is one sample and (b) the question aims to find a relationship between two variables? You want a correlation. A correlation determines the magnitude and direction of relationship between two variables (e.g., amount of sleep 30 participants got and length of time they spent on treadmill next day). 2. Does the research question for your data set indicate (a) there are two groups and (b) the question aims to find out if the groups differ in some outcome or performance? You want a two sample t-test. It reveals if the averages of the two groups are "different enough" for us to conclude that the difference in the way the groups were treated led to the average difference (e.g. one sample drank coffee, one sample drank decaffeinated coffee, and their average reading speeds were compared to see if a difference was significant). 3. Does the research question for your data set indicate (a) there is one group and (b) the question aims to find out if the group's outcome or performance differed under two conditions? You want a paired sample t-test. It shows if the average performances of the group under separate conditions are "different enough" for us to conclude that the different conditions led to the different performances (e.g. a sample of individuals learn a set of 10 words under influence of an experimental memory drug; two days later, the same sample learns a set of words without any drug, and their performances are compared).
Transcribed Image Text:group of measurements. 1. Does the research question for your data set indicate (a) there is one sample and (b) the question aims to find a relationship between two variables? You want a correlation. A correlation determines the magnitude and direction of relationship between two variables (e.g., amount of sleep 30 participants got and length of time they spent on treadmill next day). 2. Does the research question for your data set indicate (a) there are two groups and (b) the question aims to find out if the groups differ in some outcome or performance? You want a two sample t-test. It reveals if the averages of the two groups are "different enough" for us to conclude that the difference in the way the groups were treated led to the average difference (e.g. one sample drank coffee, one sample drank decaffeinated coffee, and their average reading speeds were compared to see if a difference was significant). 3. Does the research question for your data set indicate (a) there is one group and (b) the question aims to find out if the group's outcome or performance differed under two conditions? You want a paired sample t-test. It shows if the average performances of the group under separate conditions are "different enough" for us to conclude that the different conditions led to the different performances (e.g. a sample of individuals learn a set of 10 words under influence of an experimental memory drug; two days later, the same sample learns a set of words without any drug, and their performances are compared).
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Research Ethics
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS