The economic response to the overnight reduction in the French money supply by 20 percent in 1724: confirmed the quantity theory by leading to an immediate 20 percent reduction in the price level. O confirmed the neutrality of money because no real variables were affected by this nominal change. confirmed that money is not neutral in the short run because both output and prices dropped. O contradicted Okun's law because decreases in output were not associated with increases in unemployment.

The economic response to the overnight reduction in the French money supply by 20 percent in 1724: confirmed the quantity theory by leading to an immediate 20 percent reduction in the price level. O confirmed the neutrality of money because no real variables were affected by this nominal change. confirmed that money is not neutral in the short run because both output and prices dropped. O contradicted Okun's law because decreases in output were not associated with increases in unemployment.

Survey Of Economics

10th Edition

ISBN:9781337111522

Author:Tucker, Irvin B.

Publisher:Tucker, Irvin B.

Chapter20: Monetary Policy

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6SQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The three main influences of money demand (MD; i.e., shift factors) include all of the following EXCEPT: O The price level O Real GDP O The nominal interest rate O Financial technology
According to the Quantity theory of Money, MV=PT, the two sides of the equation Is mostly correct because of people's incentives Is never correct because of trade-offs Some times needs to be brought into equality by government policy always balance because total value of sales is the same as the amount of money paid for them O
The quantity theory of money. was best explained by Fisher's book "The Purchasing Power of Money" is also known as the equation of exchange links total money supply to a country's demand for money all of the above O none of the above
In the money market when the money supply is increased, the interest rate falls by ________ when the interaction of the money market with the goods market is taken into account. a)a smaller extent b)All of the other three choices are possible. c)the same extent d)a greater extent
Explain the quantity theory of money and explain how the money demand, money supply, and quantity of money are related to each other? Which variable (s) will be affected if the money supply increases in the economy? Take in context to what has been happening in the U.S economy in the past few years.
When the money market is drawn with the value of money on the vertical axis, an increase in the money supply shifts the money supply curve to the a) right, lowering the price level. b) left, raising the price level. c) right, raising the price level. d) lefi, lowering the price level.
Present an analysis where you examine the long term impact of an increase in the money supply. Use your analysis to explain why increases in the money supply may explain the observed changes in both product prices and nominal wage levels over time. Also, uses your analysis to explain (using words) what it means when macroeconomists say “money is neutral.”
A) What is the notable insight of the Quantity Theory of money? (a) An Increase in the quantity of money, ceteris paribus will result in inflation (b) A decrease in the quantity of money, ceteris paribus will result in inflation (c) An Increase in the quantity of goods and services, ceteris paribus will result in inflation (d) An Increase in the demand for money holding, ceteris paribus will result in inflation B) What is the primary purpose of the interest rate in Bagehot's rule? (a) To increase the revenue of the government (b) To decrease uncertainity (c) To eliminate moral hazard (d) To increase the revenue of the central bank
In the long run money is... neutral important fixed fictional
There is a relationship between the quantity of money in an economy and the level of prices of goods and services. A well known theory has explained this important relationship logically. Explain that theory to elaborate the philosophy of this relationship in a meaningful way. The base for your discussion should be the Fisher’s equation of exchange. Furthermore, state the convincing reasons/criticisms due to which this quantity theory of money is considered as a weak theory and has no close concern with the real life situation.
In the long run, the effect of an increase in money supply can be summarized as follows: Select one: a. Price level and nominal wage will increase in the same proportion as the increase in money supply. Consequently, the real wage falls, and level of employment increases. The LRAS shifts to the right. b. Price level and nominal wage will increase in the same proportion as the increase in money supply. Consequently, the real wage, and level of employment stays the same. The LRAS shifts right and back to the left again. c. Price level and nominal wage will increase in the same proportion as the increase in money supply. Consequently, the real wage rises, and level of employment decreases. The LRAS shifts to the left d. Price level and nominal wage will increase in the same proportion as the increase in money supply. Consequently, the real wage, and level of employment stays the same. The LRAS does not shift at all.
In the long run, according to the quantity theory of money, if the money supply doubles, what happens to the price level? What happens to real GDP? In both cases, state the percentage change in either the price level or real GDP.