translate the following statement inrp predicate logic. The domain for this problem is some unspecified collection of numbers. Consider the predicateP(x, y) = "x is greater than y."(a) Translate the following statement into predicate logic.Every number has a number that is greater than it.(x)(3)(x, y)(x), x)(3x)(y), x)(x)(³)(y,x)Ⓒ (3x)(³y)P(y,x)(b) Negate your expression from part (a), and simplify it so that no quantifier or connective lies within the scope of a negation.O (3x)(3)(~P(y, x))((((, x))(3x)(V)(P(x, y))(3x)(V)(Py, x))(x)(3)(Py, x))(c) Translate your expression from part (b) into understandable English. Don't use variables in your English translatioO All numbers have a number that they are less than or equal to.O There is a number that has a number that it is less than or equal to.O There is a number that all numbers are greater than or equal to.O There is a number that all numbers are less than or equal to.O All numbers are less than or equal to all numbers.

Given: (a) Every number has a number that is greater than it. (b) Negate the expression from part a…

The domain for this problem is some unspecified collection of numbers. Consider the predicate P(x, y) = "x is greater than y." (a) Translate the following statement into predicate logic. Every number has a number that is greater than it. (vx) (y)P(x, y) (((x) (3x))(y,x) (x)(³)(x,x) O (3x) (³)P(y,x) (b) Negate your expression from part (a), and simplify it so that no quantifier or connective lies within the scope of a negation. Ⓒ (3x)(³)(-P(y, x)) ((((x)) ((((x, y)) (3x)(V)((, x)) (x)(3)(-P(y, x)) (c) Translate your expression from part (b) into understandable English. Don't use variables in your English translation. O All numbers have a number that they are less than or equal to. There is a number that has a number that it is less than or equal to. O There is a number that all numbers are greater than or equal to. O There is a number that all numbers are less than or equal to. O All numbers are less than or equal to all numbers.

The domain for this problem is some unspecified collection of numbers. Consider the predicate P(x, y) = "x is greater than y." (a) Translate the following statement into predicate logic. Every number has a number that is greater than it. (vx) (y)P(x, y) (((x) (3x))(y,x) (x)(³)(x,x) O (3x) (³)P(y,x) (b) Negate your expression from part (a), and simplify it so that no quantifier or connective lies within the scope of a negation. Ⓒ (3x)(³)(-P(y, x)) ((((x)) ((((x, y)) (3x)(V)((, x)) (x)(3)(-P(y, x)) (c) Translate your expression from part (b) into understandable English. Don't use variables in your English translation. O All numbers have a number that they are less than or equal to. There is a number that has a number that it is less than or equal to. O There is a number that all numbers are greater than or equal to. O There is a number that all numbers are less than or equal to. O All numbers are less than or equal to all numbers.

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider a function ite (for if then else) which takes three arguments: a boolean, an expression to evaluate if the boolean is true, and a second expression to evaluate if the boolean is false. a) Given the lambda expressions for boolean constants and operators, write the lambda expression for this ite function. b) Write the lambda expression for a function iteite (for if then elseif then else) which takes five arguments: a boolean, an expression to evaluate if the boolean is true, another boolean, an expression to evaluate if the second boolean is true, and a third expression to evaluate if both booleans are false. You may assume that a correct implementation of function ite from (a) is available to you, and use it if you like.
(Ex.1 in Ch9 of the book KRR) In this chapter, we considered the semanticsof a description logic language that includes concept-forming operators such as FILLS andEXISTS but no role-forming operators. In this question, we extend the language with newconcept-forming operators and role-forming operators. (a) Present a formal semantics in the style of Section 9.3.1 for the following concept-formingoperators: [SOME r] Role existence. Something with at least 1 r. [AT-MOST n r] Maximum role cardinality. Something with at most n r’s. (b) Do the same for the following role-forming operators: [INVERSE r] Role inverse. So the :Child role could be defined as[INVERSE :Parent]. [COMPOSE r1 ... rn−1 rn ] Role composition. The rn’s of the rn−1’s . . . of ther1’s. So[ALL[COMPOSE :Parent:BrotherInLaw]Rich]would mean something all of whose uncles are rich (where an uncle is a brother-in-lawof a parent). (c) Use this semantic specification to show that for any roles r, s, and t, the…
Question 21 Poor readability and non-sense operations are expected as a result of operator overloading. True False
Write a denotational semantics mapping function for the Java do statement. Ma (do L while (B), s) A=
3. Write a sentence that is true in an interpretation A if, and only if, the domain of A contains exactly two elements. 4. Write a sentence that is true in an interpretation A if, and only if, the domain of 2A contains exactly three elements.
2. Morphology, syntax (a) In German, the ending of a regular verb in present tense is normally t for third person singular, unless the stem ends on t or d, in which case the ending is et. Examples are: stem 3rd sing. lern lernt arbeit arbeitet red redet Draw a finite-state transducer that maps a stem to this verb form. To be precise, the input is the stem of a regular verb followed by the symbol #, and the output is the third person singular present tense form of that stem, without the final #. As transition label you can use the abbreviation other, which is short for a:a, b:b, c:C, e:e, ..., that is, a mapping from any letter (other than t or d) to that same •.•/
(2) If ¬L is context free, then L must also be context free. True False
1. Construct a valid argument in English: a. with at least two premises b. involving at least four (4) atomic propositions c. involving at least one negation operator and one of the other operators. 2. Translate the argument into propositional logic (L1). PS: a. Specify the key clearly. b. Let the translation be as expressive as possible (i.e., make every possible logical operator explicit). 3. Check the validity of the argument using a truth-table.
2) Give examples of each of the following: a) A language that is not context free. b) A language that is context free but not deterministic context free. c) A language that is accepted by a deterministic pushdown automaton but is not regular.
c) Translate the following English sentence into predicate logic. Use the predicates listed. “All CS students take at least two classes". Let the domain of discourse be all people and all courses CS(x) := True if x is a CS student Takes(x,y) := True if student x has taken course y Equals(x.y) := True if x equals y.
3. Let S(x) be the statement "x studied for the exam" and H(x, y) be the statement "x scored higher than y in the exam," where the domain of x and y consists of all students in this class. Which logical expression corresponds to the following statement? "Every student in this class who studied for the exam scored higher in the exam than every student who did not study for the exam." a. VxVy (H (x, y) → (S(x) ^ ¬S(y))) b. VxVy(S(x)^¬S(y) ^ H (x, y)) c. VxVy((S(x) ^ ¬S(y)) → H (x, y)) d. VxVy((S(x) → ¬S(y)) → H (x, y))