Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Social Science
Political Science
The dissent in the U.S. Supreme Court case of Citizens United questioned who is speaking when corporations endorse or attack political candidates. This portion of the dissent made the following points: O "It cannot realistically be said to be the shareholders, who tend to be far removed from the day-to-day decisions of the firm and whose political preferences may be opaque to management." O "Perhaps the officers or directors of the corporation have the best claim to be the ones speaking, except their fiduciary duties generally prohibit them from using corporate funds for personal ends." O Take away the ability to use general treasury funds for some of those ads, and no one's autonomy, dignity, or political equality has been impinged upon in the least" All of these

The dissent in the U.S. Supreme Court case of Citizens United questioned who is speaking when corporations endorse or attack political candidates. This portion of the dissent made the following points: O "It cannot realistically be said to be the shareholders, who tend to be far removed from the day-to-day decisions of the firm and whose political preferences may be opaque to management." O "Perhaps the officers or directors of the corporation have the best claim to be the ones speaking, except their fiduciary duties generally prohibit them from using corporate funds for personal ends." O Take away the ability to use general treasury funds for some of those ads, and no one's autonomy, dignity, or political equality has been impinged upon in the least" All of these

icon
Related questions
Question
The dissent in the U.S. Supreme Court case of Citizens United questioned who is speaking when corporations endorse or attack political candidates. This portion of the dissent made the following points: "It cannot realistically be said to be the shareholders, who tend to be far removed from the day-to-day decisions of the firm and whose political preferences may be opaque to management." O "Perhaps the officers or directors of the corporation have the best claim to be the ones speaking, except their fiduciary duties generally prohibit them from using corporate funds for personal ends." Take away the ability to use general treasury funds for some of those ads, and no one's autonomy, dignity, or political equality has been impinged upon in the least" O All of these
Transcribed Image Text:The dissent in the U.S. Supreme Court case of Citizens United questioned who is speaking when corporations endorse or attack political candidates. This portion of the dissent made the following points: "It cannot realistically be said to be the shareholders, who tend to be far removed from the day-to-day decisions of the firm and whose political preferences may be opaque to management." O "Perhaps the officers or directors of the corporation have the best claim to be the ones speaking, except their fiduciary duties generally prohibit them from using corporate funds for personal ends." Take away the ability to use general treasury funds for some of those ads, and no one's autonomy, dignity, or political equality has been impinged upon in the least" O All of these
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer