The diagram plots GDP per worker vs. capital per worker, both across countries in 1990 (the scatter plots) and thetrajectories since 1760 for a few representative countries (the paths). Based on this information, which of thefollowing statements is correct?40,000US (1800-1990)35,000-Switzerland30,000 -(1990)UK (1760-1990)195325,000 -Japan (1870-1990)1973....A20,000 -Taiwan (1901-1990).15,000 -191010,000 -19105,000 -.1760 1800ʻIndia (1860-1990)0-10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000Capital per worker (1985 PPP $)Select one:а.There is no clear evidence of technological progress in GDP per worker in the US.b. Taiwan was more capital intensive than the UK in 1990.O c.The average product of capital (Y/K) has been higher in Japan than in the UK over the years shown.d. Switzerland has been the most successful country in attaining a high GDP per worker for a given amount ofcapital per worker.GDP per worker (1985 PPP $)

The diagram plots GDP per worker vs. capital per worker, both across countries in 1990 (the scatter plots) and the trajectories since 1760 for a few representative countries (the paths). Based on this information, which of the following statements is correct? 40,000 ¬ US (1800-1990) 35,000 - Switzerland 30,000어 (1990) UK (1760-1990) 1953 25,000 - Japan (1870-1990) 1973.... 20,000 - 15,000 11910 Taiwan (1901-1990). 10,000 – 1910 5,000- 1760 India (1860-1990) 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,00 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 Capital per worker (1985 PPP $) Select one: O a. There is no clear evidence of technological progress in GDP per worker in the US. O b. Taiwan was more capital intensive than the UK in 1990. O c. The average product of capital (Y/K) has been higher in Japan than in the UK over the years shown. O d. Switzerland has been the most successful country in attaining a high GDP per worker for a given amount of capital per worker. GDP per worker (1985 PPP $)

The diagram plots GDP per worker vs. capital per worker, both across countries in 1990 (the scatter plots) and the trajectories since 1760 for a few representative countries (the paths). Based on this information, which of the following statements is correct? 40,000 ¬ US (1800-1990) 35,000 - Switzerland 30,000어 (1990) UK (1760-1990) 1953 25,000 - Japan (1870-1990) 1973.... 20,000 - 15,000 11910 Taiwan (1901-1990). 10,000 – 1910 5,000- 1760 India (1860-1990) 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,00 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 Capital per worker (1985 PPP $) Select one: O a. There is no clear evidence of technological progress in GDP per worker in the US. O b. Taiwan was more capital intensive than the UK in 1990. O c. The average product of capital (Y/K) has been higher in Japan than in the UK over the years shown. O d. Switzerland has been the most successful country in attaining a high GDP per worker for a given amount of capital per worker. GDP per worker (1985 PPP $)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Using the data In the table below related to nominal GDP, real GDP, and total population, answer the questlons for the time perlod 2010-2019: Real GDP (in Millions) (2012 Base Year) Population (in Nominal GDP (in Millions) Year (suo!W 282.4 000 10,128.000 13,262.000 285.5 2002 288.6 000 291.0 2004 12,422,000 14.913.000 296.6 13,178,000 9002 8887 15.626,000 000 808 14.291.000 15,605.000 800 600 2010 14,524,000 2011 15,518,000 15.841.000 311.7 2012 16,163,000 16,197,000 2013 16,768,000 16,495,000 316.2 2014 16,912,000 318.6 2015 17,432,000 2016 18,954,000 17,731,000 323.1 2017 19,543,000 18,144,000 325.1 2018 20,612,000 18,688,000 327.1 2019 21.433,000 329.1 Instructlons: In part a, round your responses to the nearest dollar. In parts b and c, enter your responses as a percentage rounded to one decimal place. a. Calculate nominal and real GDP per capita for 2010 and 2019. For 2010: Nominal GDP per capita = $ Real GDP per capita = $ For 2019: Nominal GDP per capita = $ %3D Real GDP per…
Cross country comparisons of GDP per capita typically use purchasing power parity equivalent exchange rates which are a measure of the long run equilibrium value of an exchange rate in fact we use PPP equivalent exchange rates in this model why could using this market exchange rate which sometimes change direct dramatically in a short period of time be misleading
Explain why GDP per capita comparisons among nations are not a perfect measure of differences in economic well-being.
Hey! Need help with the following question, which divides into three sub-questions. Thank you in advance! Graphs are attatched below. What is the GDP per worker in Arctica? Based on the given information, would Arctica be considered more productive than Lusitania? Explain your answer. How would you use the information given in both these tables to compare living standards in Lusitania and Arctica?
Using the table below, calculate the GDP per capita for Country C. Round your answer to the nearest dollar. GDP per capita GDP Population GDP per capita Country (in billions of U.S. dollars) (in millions) (in U.S. dollars) A $1,300 320 ? B $1,790 585 ? C $3,610 1,050 ? D $36,300 1,060 ? Provide your answer below: GDP per capita = $
63,080 47,090 United 44,940 States Germany 41,310 30,600 ueder 21,600 GDP per Capita (2018) (In U.S. dollars) ipnes Παναγ 11,124 10,230 امي الحمد المحمود حجم خون هم می می می می 9,460 9,180 aver d 7.480 China 2.020 360 Cuba India 800 790 Nigeria Halt Ethiopia
Need help with these, New Zealand vs Australia is the main context for this question as your answering
In 2018, the country of Questville had a GDP of $39000.00 and the country of Mistania had a GDP of $19500.00, which is half, or 50% of Questville's GDP. If Questville grows at the slow rate of 1% for 5 years while Mistania grows at the fast rate of 6% for 5 years, what will Mistania's GDP be as a percentage of Questville's GDP in 5 years from now? Include the % sign in your answer. Does this example illustrate the concept of convergence? OYes SONO
Which type of statistic measures the financial-economic interdependence between the US and the countries of Latin America? Select one: a. % households with Internet access b. % exports in GDP c. % tourism in exports d. % personal remittances in GDP
Performance of Key Sectors Exports of manufactured goods surpassed RM1 tril mark for the first time Manufactured Goods Manufactured Goods RM848.84 bil RM1.067 tril 个25.6% 123.4% 86.1%* 86.0% EXPORTS IMPORTS RM1.240 tril RM987.24 bil 5.6% 7.9% 5.4% 6.2% Others . Agriculture Goods RM4.71 bil RM98.10 Others Ágriculture Goods RM60.97 bil 个12.3% 136.8% RM24.40 bil Mining Goods RM69.79 bil 158.7% 125.0% 119.5% Mining Goods RM53.04 bil Note: * share 19.0% 1. ANALYSE THE PERFORMANCE OF THE KEYS SECTORS ABOVE
Confused on how to answer
The following table shows real GDP per capita for the United States, South Korea, and Chad between 1970 and 2000. All figures are in 1998 U.S. dollars. (image inserted) The (decade-long) economic growth rate for the United States is shown in the second column. For example, from 1970 to 1980, the United States GDP grew from $18,395 to $22,666, an increase of ($22,666−$18,395)/($18,395)=23%. Use this method to fill in the growth rates for South Korea and Chad in the previous table. Enter the growth rates to the nearest whole percentage point. Compare the data for the United States and South Korea between 1970 and 1980. During this period, (South Korea OR The United States) had a higher level of real GDP per capita, while (South Korea OR The United States) experienced a higher growth rate in real GDP per capita. Convergence theory predicts that poor countries will grow more quickly than rich countries. Which one of the following is a reason for this? Rich…