The danger of thermal effect of Electromagnetic Radiation is clearly proven and all the standards limiting the EMF considers this thermal effect to define the exposure limits. Which of the two statements is more correct with respect to other. Explain with proper reasons. Considering thermal effect to defineE> effect to define EMF exposure EMF exposure limits is sufficient only the Considering only the thermal limits is NOT sufficient, non- thermal effects also need to be considered
The danger of thermal effect of Electromagnetic Radiation is clearly proven and all the standards limiting the EMF considers this thermal effect to define the exposure limits. Which of the two statements is more correct with respect to other. Explain with proper reasons. Considering thermal effect to defineE> effect to define EMF exposure EMF exposure limits is sufficient only the Considering only the thermal limits is NOT sufficient, non- thermal effects also need to be considered
Related questions
Question
Transcribed Image Text:The danger of thermal effect of Electromagnetic Radiation is clearly proven and all the
standards limiting the EMF considers this thermal effect to define the exposure limits.
Which of the two statements is
more correct with respect to other.
Explain with proper reasons.
Considering
thermal effect to define E effect to define EMF exposure
EMF exposure limits is
sufficient
only
the
Considering only the thermal
limits is NOT sufficient, non-
thermal effects also need to be
considered
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 2 images
