The content of containers of a particular lubricant is known to be normally distributed with a variance of 0.03 liter. Find the P-value of the test of null hypothesis o? = 0.03 against the alternative that o²2 # 0.03 if a random sample of 10 containers are 10.2, 9.7, 10.1, 10.3, 10.1, 9.8, 9.9, 10.4, 10.3, and 9.8 liters. %3D

The content of containers of a particular lubricant is known to be normally distributed with a variance of 0.03 liter. Find the P-value of the test of null hypothesis o? = 0.03 against the alternative that o²2 # 0.03 if a random sample of 10 containers are 10.2, 9.7, 10.1, 10.3, 10.1, 9.8, 9.9, 10.4, 10.3, and 9.8 liters. %3D

Name: The content of containers of a particular lubricant is known to be no
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:07:12.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: The content of containers of a particular lubricant is known to be normallydistributed with a variance of 0.03 liter. Find the P-value of the test of nullhypothesis o? = 0.03 against the alternative that o22 + 0.03 if a random sampleof 10 containers

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

An automobile manufacturer claims that their van has a 50.5 miles/gallon (MPG) rating. An independent testing firm has been contracted to test the MPG for this van. After testing 101 vans they found a mean MPG of 50.1 with a variance of 4 MPG. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.1 level that the vans have an incorrect manufacturer's MPG rating? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario. Answer Ho H₂ Tables Keypad Keyboard Shortcuts
In a test of hypothesis, the null hypothesis is that o = o and the alternative hypothesis is 2. Samples of sizes n₁ = 18 and n₂ = 17 selected from two normal populations produced variances of s² = 9.94 and s2 = 21.61, respectively. What is the approximate p- value for this test? O c. 0.1223 a. 0.0612 O e. 0.9388 O d. 0.4694 O b. 0.0408
A study was conducted to determine whether magnets were effective in treating pain. The values represent measurements of pain using the visual analog scale. Assume that both samples are independent simple random samples from populations having normal distributions. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those given a sham treatment have pain reductions that vary more than the pain reductions for those treated with magnets. What are the null and alternative hypotheses? OA. Ho: 002 H₁:0² = 0²/2 OC. H₂:0²=0²2 H₁:0² > 0²/2 Identify the test statistic. F = (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Use technology to identify the P-value. The P-value is (Round to three decimal places as needed.) What is the conclusion for this hypothesis test? C OB. H₁: 0 = 0² H₁:0² +03 OD. H₂:0²=0²2 H₁:0² <0²/ O A. Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that those given a sham treatment have pain reductions that vary more than those treated with magnets. O B. Fail to reject…
Two samples. each with n = 5 scores, have a pooled variance of 40. What is the estimated standard error for the sample mean uniference? how do i solve?
If 10 measurements of the density of a certain kind of glass had a variance of 0.0012, construct a 95% confidence interval for σ2, which measures the true variability of the density of this kind of glass.
Our environment is very sensitive to the amount of ozone in the upper atmosphere. The level of ozone normally found is 7.6 parts/million (ppm). A researcher believes that the current ozone level is not at a normal level. The mean of 1313 samples is 7.2 ppm with a variance of 0.49 Assume the population is normally distributed. A level of significance of 0.02 will be used. Make the decision to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.
In the Izmir University of Economics, a professor claims that exam scores for non-accounting majors are more variable than for accounting majors. Random samples of 30 non-accounting majors and 30 accounting majors are taken from a final exam held on 2019. Test at the 5% level the null hypothesis that the two population variances are equal against the alternative that the true variance is higher for the non-accounting majors. Assume the populations are normally distributed. s = 1584.272 ny = 30 s = 400.495 Non-Accounting n = 30 Accounting To test the professor's claim, identify the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis is represented by H, and the alternative hypothesis is represented by H,. Choose the correct answer below. O A. Ho: o 2 O B. Ho: o = OD. Ho: o =0 H,: o
A study tested the claim that heights of Americans and heights of Austrians have different variances with s=7.48092 cm for Americans and 7.14756 cm for Austrians. The sample sizes are n1= 145 and n2= 157. When using the F test with these data, is it correct to reason that there is no need to check for normalcy because n1 is greater than 30, and n2 is greater than 30?
Two different types of catalysts are used in a chemical process. We want to conduct a hypothesis test to see if there is a difference in the yields at 5% significance level. Assume both populations are normaly distributed. To this end, we collect a simple random sample from each process. Assume equal variances. = = n-11, n=13,x,-90, x 91.4, 8, 4, 8=4.5
In a random sample of size 36 we observe a sample mean of 25 and a variance of 144. If we test the hypotheses below with a significance level of 0.05. Ho: µ = 20 HẠ :4 > 20 what will be the calculated test statistic?
Assume that the examination marks of students follow normal distri- butivn with unknown mean (4) but known variance (a?) = 0.25. Test the hypothesis Ho : u =8 against H: #8 with the level of significance a = 0.01, the sample mean being equal to 7.8 and the sample size being 50.
A researcher decides to measure anxiety in group of bullies and a group of bystanders using a 23-item, 3 point anxiety scale. Assume scores on the anxiety scales are normally distributed and the variance among the group of bullies and bystanders are the same. A group of 30 bullies scores an average of 21.5 with a sample standard deviation of 10 on the anxiety scale. A group of 27 bystanders scored an average of 25.8 with a sample standard deviation of 8 on the anxiety scale. You do not have any presupposed assumptions whether bullies or bystanders will be more anxious so you formulate the null and alternative hypothesis based on that.