The authors of a paper randomly selected two samples of patients admitted to the hospital after suffering a stroke. One sample was selected from patients who received biofeedback weight training for 8 weeks, and the other sample was selected from patients who did not receive this training. At the end of 8 weeks, the time it took (in seconds) to stand from a sitting position and then to sit down again (called sit-stand-sit time) was measured for the people in each sample. Data consistent with summary quantities given in the paper are given below. For purposes of this exercise, you can assume that the samples are representative of the population of stroke patients who receive the biofeedback training and the population of stroke patients who do not receive this training. Biofeedback Group 2.0 2.7 4.4 2.2 2.8 4.2 3.3 4.1 3.3 3.6 2.9 3.6 3.6 2.4 No Biofeedback Group 5.3 4.9 4.1 4.4 4.9 4.5 4.4 5.3 3.6 4.4 5.3 4.6 4.2 3.6 3.2 4.1 Use the given data to construct a 95% confidence interval for the difference in mean sit-stand-sit time for these two populations. (Use #biofeedback - no biofeedback Round your answers to three decimal places.) -0.826 X to 1.748 X seconds Interpret the interval. O We are 95% confident that, for patients in the sample, the difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients who received the biofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is between these two values. O We are 95% confident that the true difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients who received the biofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is between these two values. O There is a 95% chance that the true difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients who received the biofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is between these two values. O There is a 95% chance that the true difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients who received biofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is directly in the middle of these two values. O There is a 95% chance that, for patients in the sample, the difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients who received the biofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is between these two values.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
help
ASK YOUR TEACHER
The authors of a paper randomly selected two samples of patients admitted to the hospital after suffering a stroke. One sample
was selected from patients who received biofeedback weight training for 8 weeks, and the other sample was selected from
patients who did not receive this training. At the end of 8 weeks, the time it took (in seconds) to stand from a sitting position and
then to sit down again (called sit-stand-sit time) was measured for the people in each sample. Data consistent with summary
quantities given in the paper are given below. For purposes of this exercise, you can assume that the samples are representative
of the population of stroke patients who receive the biofeedback training and the population of stroke patients who do not receive
this training.
Biofeedback Group
2.0 2.7 4.4
2.2
No Biofeedback Group
5.3 4.9 4.1
PRACTICE ANOTHER
Mec
4.4
2.8 4.2 3.3
4.9 4.5 4.4 5.3 3.6 4.4 5.3 4.6 4.2 3.6 4.1
Use the given data to construct a 95% confidence interval for the difference in mean sit-stand-sit time for these two populations.
(Use biofeedback - no biofeedback: Round your answers to three decimal places.)
-0.826
X to 1.748
X seconds
4.1 3.3 3.6 2.9 3.6 3.6 2.4 3.2
Interpret the interval.
O We are 95% confident that, for patients in the sample, the difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients
who received the biofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is between these two
values.
We are 95% confident that the true difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients who received the
biofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is between these two values.
O There is a 95% chance that the true difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients who received the
biofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is between these two values.
O There is a 95% chance that the true difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients who received
biofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is directly in the middle of these two
values.
O There is a 95% chance that, for patients in the sample, the difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients
who received the biofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is between these two
values.
in
us
S
3.5
Transcribed Image Text:ASK YOUR TEACHER The authors of a paper randomly selected two samples of patients admitted to the hospital after suffering a stroke. One sample was selected from patients who received biofeedback weight training for 8 weeks, and the other sample was selected from patients who did not receive this training. At the end of 8 weeks, the time it took (in seconds) to stand from a sitting position and then to sit down again (called sit-stand-sit time) was measured for the people in each sample. Data consistent with summary quantities given in the paper are given below. For purposes of this exercise, you can assume that the samples are representative of the population of stroke patients who receive the biofeedback training and the population of stroke patients who do not receive this training. Biofeedback Group 2.0 2.7 4.4 2.2 No Biofeedback Group 5.3 4.9 4.1 PRACTICE ANOTHER Mec 4.4 2.8 4.2 3.3 4.9 4.5 4.4 5.3 3.6 4.4 5.3 4.6 4.2 3.6 4.1 Use the given data to construct a 95% confidence interval for the difference in mean sit-stand-sit time for these two populations. (Use biofeedback - no biofeedback: Round your answers to three decimal places.) -0.826 X to 1.748 X seconds 4.1 3.3 3.6 2.9 3.6 3.6 2.4 3.2 Interpret the interval. O We are 95% confident that, for patients in the sample, the difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients who received the biofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is between these two values. We are 95% confident that the true difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients who received the biofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is between these two values. O There is a 95% chance that the true difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients who received the biofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is between these two values. O There is a 95% chance that the true difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients who received biofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is directly in the middle of these two values. O There is a 95% chance that, for patients in the sample, the difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients who received the biofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is between these two values. in us S 3.5
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman