The article "Vital Dimensions in Volume Perception: Can the Eye Fool the Stomach?" gave the following data on the dimensions of 27 representative food products (Gerber baby food, Cheez Whiz, Skippy Peanut Butter, and Ahmed's tandoori paste, to name a few). Product Maximum Width (cm) Minimum Width (cm) 1 2 2.50 2.90 2.70

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
The article "Vital Dimensions in Volume Perception: Can the Eye Fool the Stomach?"+ gave the following data on the dimensions of 27 representative food products (Gerber baby food, Cheez Whiz, Skippy Peanut Butter, and Ahmed's tandoori paste, to name a few).
Product Maximum Width (cm)
Minimum Width (cm)
1
2
O
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Standardized
Residual
3
2
2.50
1
2.90
2...
2.15
2
2.90
3.20
2.00
1.60
4.80
5.90
5.80
2.90
2.45
2.60
2.60
2.70
3.10
5.10
10.20
3.50
2.70
3.00
2.70
2.50
2.40
4.40
7.50
4.25
1.80
2.70
2.00
2.60
3.15
1.80
1.50
3.80
5.00
4.75
2.80
2.10
2.20
2.60
2.60
2.90
5.10
10.20
3.50
1.20
(a) Fit the simple linear regression model that would allow prediction of the maximum width of a food container based on its minimum width. (Round all numerical values to three decimal places.)
1.70
(b) Calculate the standardized residuals (or just the residuals if a computer program that doesn't give standardized residuals is used) and make a residual plot to determine whether there are any outliers.
C
1.75
1.70
1.20
1.20
Residual
LLL
2
2
10 12 Width
7.50
4.25
Minimum
0
6 8 10 12
12 Width
Standardized
3
1
-1
Minimum
Did deletion of this point result in a large change in the equation of the estimated regression line?
O Yes, removing the point resulted in a reasonably substantial change in the equation of the estimated regression line.
O Yes, removing the point did not result in a reasonably substantial change in the equation of the estimated regression line.
O No, removing the point resulted in a reasonably substantial change in the equation of the estimated regression line.
O No, removing the point did not result in a reasonably substantial change in the equation of the estimated regression line.
O
(d) For the regression line of part (c), interpret the estimated slope
O For every 1-am increase in minimum width, the mean maximum width is estimated to decrease by the slope.
O For every 1 increase in food products, the mean maximum width is estimated to increase by the slope.
O For every 1-am increase in minimum width, the mean maximum width is estimated to increase by the slope.
O For every 1 increase in food products, the mean maximum width is estimated to decrease by the slope.
For the regression line of part (c), interpret the intercept.
O The intercept would be an estimate of the mean maximum width when the minimum width is twenty-five.
O The intercept would be an estimate of the mean maximum width when the minimum width is zero.
O The intercept would be an estimate of the mean minimum width when the maximum width is zero.
O The intercept would be an estimate of the mean minimum width when the maximum width is twenty-seven
O The intercept would be an estimate of the mean maximum width when the minimum width is twenty-seven
Standardized
Residual
4
3
2
1
2 4
Minimum
(c) The data point with the largest residual is for a 1-liter Coke bottle. Delete this data point and determine the equation of the regression line. (Round all numerical values to three decimal places.)
8 10 12 Width
Ⓡ
(e) For the data set with the Coke bottle deleted, are the assumptions of the simple linear regression model reasonable? Give statistical evidence.
The pattern in the standardized residual plot suggests that the variances of the y distributions decrease as x increases, and therefore that the assumption of constant variance is not valid.
O The pattern in the standardized residual plot suggests that the variances of the x distributions decrease as y increases, and therefore that the assumption of constant variance is valid.
O The pattern in the standardized residual plot suggests that the variances of the x distributions decrease as y increases, and therefore that the assumption of constant variance is not valid.
The pattern in the standardized residual plot suggests that the variances of the y distributions decrease as x increases, and therefore that the assumption of constant variance is valid.
Standardized
Residual
4.
2
1
0
2
4
6
8 10
Minimum
12 Width
0
Transcribed Image Text:The article "Vital Dimensions in Volume Perception: Can the Eye Fool the Stomach?"+ gave the following data on the dimensions of 27 representative food products (Gerber baby food, Cheez Whiz, Skippy Peanut Butter, and Ahmed's tandoori paste, to name a few). Product Maximum Width (cm) Minimum Width (cm) 1 2 O 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Standardized Residual 3 2 2.50 1 2.90 2... 2.15 2 2.90 3.20 2.00 1.60 4.80 5.90 5.80 2.90 2.45 2.60 2.60 2.70 3.10 5.10 10.20 3.50 2.70 3.00 2.70 2.50 2.40 4.40 7.50 4.25 1.80 2.70 2.00 2.60 3.15 1.80 1.50 3.80 5.00 4.75 2.80 2.10 2.20 2.60 2.60 2.90 5.10 10.20 3.50 1.20 (a) Fit the simple linear regression model that would allow prediction of the maximum width of a food container based on its minimum width. (Round all numerical values to three decimal places.) 1.70 (b) Calculate the standardized residuals (or just the residuals if a computer program that doesn't give standardized residuals is used) and make a residual plot to determine whether there are any outliers. C 1.75 1.70 1.20 1.20 Residual LLL 2 2 10 12 Width 7.50 4.25 Minimum 0 6 8 10 12 12 Width Standardized 3 1 -1 Minimum Did deletion of this point result in a large change in the equation of the estimated regression line? O Yes, removing the point resulted in a reasonably substantial change in the equation of the estimated regression line. O Yes, removing the point did not result in a reasonably substantial change in the equation of the estimated regression line. O No, removing the point resulted in a reasonably substantial change in the equation of the estimated regression line. O No, removing the point did not result in a reasonably substantial change in the equation of the estimated regression line. O (d) For the regression line of part (c), interpret the estimated slope O For every 1-am increase in minimum width, the mean maximum width is estimated to decrease by the slope. O For every 1 increase in food products, the mean maximum width is estimated to increase by the slope. O For every 1-am increase in minimum width, the mean maximum width is estimated to increase by the slope. O For every 1 increase in food products, the mean maximum width is estimated to decrease by the slope. For the regression line of part (c), interpret the intercept. O The intercept would be an estimate of the mean maximum width when the minimum width is twenty-five. O The intercept would be an estimate of the mean maximum width when the minimum width is zero. O The intercept would be an estimate of the mean minimum width when the maximum width is zero. O The intercept would be an estimate of the mean minimum width when the maximum width is twenty-seven O The intercept would be an estimate of the mean maximum width when the minimum width is twenty-seven Standardized Residual 4 3 2 1 2 4 Minimum (c) The data point with the largest residual is for a 1-liter Coke bottle. Delete this data point and determine the equation of the regression line. (Round all numerical values to three decimal places.) 8 10 12 Width Ⓡ (e) For the data set with the Coke bottle deleted, are the assumptions of the simple linear regression model reasonable? Give statistical evidence. The pattern in the standardized residual plot suggests that the variances of the y distributions decrease as x increases, and therefore that the assumption of constant variance is not valid. O The pattern in the standardized residual plot suggests that the variances of the x distributions decrease as y increases, and therefore that the assumption of constant variance is valid. O The pattern in the standardized residual plot suggests that the variances of the x distributions decrease as y increases, and therefore that the assumption of constant variance is not valid. The pattern in the standardized residual plot suggests that the variances of the y distributions decrease as x increases, and therefore that the assumption of constant variance is valid. Standardized Residual 4. 2 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 Minimum 12 Width 0
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps with 3 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman