TABLE 4-6. DNA RESULTS FOR AUTO VANDALISM DNA D8 D21 D7 CSF D3 TH01 D13 D16 D2 D19| vWA | TPOX | D18 | AML D5 FGA Samples Theodore 9 29 13 13 11 28 14 12 7 10 7 20 XY 18 31 9 14 18 11 13 Conroy 14 20 17 12 11 12 16 25 Sean. 9 29 6 13 10 13 8 28 14 12 7 12 12 20 XY 14 11 32 30 12 13 19 Williams 18 31 9. 14 18 20 David 9 29 6. 8 11 20 11 12 7 12 19 20 31 9 12 12 11 XY Tucker 18 12 19 27 12 13 14 20 Blood from 9 29 6. 13 13 11 28 14 12 7 10 7 20 XY 18 31 14 18 11 13 14 20 17 12 11 12 16 25 Damaged Auto
When Theodore Conroy left his house to go to work on Tuesday morning, he saw that his car windows were broken and graffiti was painted his vehicle. When the police arrived to investigate, they found blood on the broken glass. Mr. Conroy had a bandage on his right hand. According to his own statement, Mr. Conroy accidentally cut himself at work.
When the police talked to various neighbors to ask if they had seen or heard anything, they were told that Mr. Conroy had a long-standing dispute with his cousin, Sean Williams, and that Mr. Williams might be to blame for the damage. When they visited the Williams' residence, they noticed Mr. Williams had a bandage on his left hand. When asked about it, he denied the vandalism and said he cut himself trimming bushes in his yard.
Mr. Williams suggested that teenagers were likely to be responsible for the damage. Tracking down several teenagers who had been seen in the neighborhood, it was discovered that David Tucker was present during the time frame the vandalism took place and he had cuts and scrapes on both hands. Mr. Tucker denied the vandalism and told the police he scraped his hands in a skateboard accident. The police obtained warrants for DNA samples from all three men involved for comparison with the blood on the car. Table 4-6 shows the results of the DNA testing. Based on the DNA evidence, should any of the men that were interviewed be considered a suspect for this crime? Explain your answer.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
