TABLE 3-4 Typical physical composition of residential MSW excluding recycled materials and food wastes discharged with wastewater (1990) Percent by weight Component Organic Food wastes Paper Cardboard Plastics Textiles Rubber Leather Yard wastes Wood Misc. organics Inorganic Glass Tin cans Aluminum Other metal Dirt, ash, etc. Total United States" Range 6-18 25-40 3-10 4-10 0-4 0-2 0-2 5-20 1-4 4-12 2-8 0-1 1-4 0-6 Typical' 9.0 34.0 6.0 7.0 2.0 0.5 0.5 18.5 2.0 8.0 6.0 0.5 3.0 3.0 100.0 Packaging materials 79.5 50-60 12-16- 4-8 20-30 6-8 2-4 Davis, Californiad 6.0 33.1 7.9 10.7 2.4 2.5 0.1 17.7 5.0 0.4 5.8 3.9 0.4 3.6 0.5 100.0 = 20.5 a Adapted in part from Refs. 2, 3, 9, and 14-16. Reported percentage distributions are exclusive of special and hazardous wastes. bTwenty percent of the households in the United States are assumed to have food waste grinders. Additionally, it is assumed that the percentage of food waste ground up and discharged with wastewater is 25 percent. Current (1990) recycling rate for the United States assumed to be 11 percent. Adapted in part from Ref. 10. dBased on measurements made over a five-year period (1985 to 1990) during the first two weeks of October (see Table 3-9).

Structural Analysis
6th Edition
ISBN:9781337630931
Author:KASSIMALI, Aslam.
Publisher:KASSIMALI, Aslam.
Chapter2: Loads On Structures
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
TABLE 3-4
Typical physical composition of residential MSW excluding recycled
materials and food wastes discharged with wastewater (1990)
Percent by weight
Component
Organic
Food wastes
Paper
Cardboard
Plastics
Textiles
Rubber
Leather
Yard wastes
Wood
Misc. organics
Inorganic
Glass
Tin cans
Aluminum
Other metal
Dirt, ash, etc.
Total
United States"
Range
6-18
25-40
3-10
4-10
0-4
0-2
0-2
5-20
1-4
4-12
2-8
0-1
1-4
0-6
Typical'
9.0
34.0
6.0
7.0
2.0
0.5
0.5
18.5
2.0
8.0
6.0
0.5
3.0
3.0
100.0
Packaging materials
79,5
50-60
12-16-
4-8
20-30
6-8
2-4
Davis, Californiad
6.0
33.1
7.9
10.7
2.4
2.5
0.1
17.7
5.0
0.4
5.8
3.9
0.4
3.6
0.5
100.0
= 20.5
a Adapted in part from Refs. 2, 3, 9, and 14-16. Reported percentage distributions are exclusive of special and
hazardous wastes.
Twenty percent of the households in the United States are assumed to have food waste grinders. Additionally,
it is assumed that the percentage of food waste ground up and discharged with wastewater is 25 percent.
Current (1990) recycling rate for the United States assumed to be 11 percent.
Adapted in part from Ref. 10.
Based on measurements made over a five-year period (1985 to 1990) during the first two weeks of October
(see Table 3-9).
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 3-4 Typical physical composition of residential MSW excluding recycled materials and food wastes discharged with wastewater (1990) Percent by weight Component Organic Food wastes Paper Cardboard Plastics Textiles Rubber Leather Yard wastes Wood Misc. organics Inorganic Glass Tin cans Aluminum Other metal Dirt, ash, etc. Total United States" Range 6-18 25-40 3-10 4-10 0-4 0-2 0-2 5-20 1-4 4-12 2-8 0-1 1-4 0-6 Typical' 9.0 34.0 6.0 7.0 2.0 0.5 0.5 18.5 2.0 8.0 6.0 0.5 3.0 3.0 100.0 Packaging materials 79,5 50-60 12-16- 4-8 20-30 6-8 2-4 Davis, Californiad 6.0 33.1 7.9 10.7 2.4 2.5 0.1 17.7 5.0 0.4 5.8 3.9 0.4 3.6 0.5 100.0 = 20.5 a Adapted in part from Refs. 2, 3, 9, and 14-16. Reported percentage distributions are exclusive of special and hazardous wastes. Twenty percent of the households in the United States are assumed to have food waste grinders. Additionally, it is assumed that the percentage of food waste ground up and discharged with wastewater is 25 percent. Current (1990) recycling rate for the United States assumed to be 11 percent. Adapted in part from Ref. 10. Based on measurements made over a five-year period (1985 to 1990) during the first two weeks of October (see Table 3-9).
3-3. A community is now achieving a 25 percent by weight separation of wastes made
up of the following items: mixed paper, 44%; cardboard, 6%; plastics, 10%; yard
waste, 16%; glass, 12%; and mixed metal (tin cans and other metals), 12%. If the
distribution of waste components given in column 3 of Table 3-4 is representative of
the wastes that are now collected, determine the as generated percentage distribution
of the waste components.
Transcribed Image Text:3-3. A community is now achieving a 25 percent by weight separation of wastes made up of the following items: mixed paper, 44%; cardboard, 6%; plastics, 10%; yard waste, 16%; glass, 12%; and mixed metal (tin cans and other metals), 12%. If the distribution of waste components given in column 3 of Table 3-4 is representative of the wastes that are now collected, determine the as generated percentage distribution of the waste components.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Mechanical processes
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, civil-engineering and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
Structural Analysis
Structural Analysis
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9781337630931
Author:
KASSIMALI, Aslam.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Structural Analysis (10th Edition)
Structural Analysis (10th Edition)
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9780134610672
Author:
Russell C. Hibbeler
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou…
Principles of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou…
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9781337705028
Author:
Braja M. Das, Nagaratnam Sivakugan
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Fundamentals of Structural Analysis
Fundamentals of Structural Analysis
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9780073398006
Author:
Kenneth M. Leet Emeritus, Chia-Ming Uang, Joel Lanning
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Sustainable Energy
Sustainable Energy
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9781337551663
Author:
DUNLAP, Richard A.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Traffic and Highway Engineering
Traffic and Highway Engineering
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9781305156241
Author:
Garber, Nicholas J.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning