Suppose we have taken independent, random samples of sizes n = 6 and na = 8 from two normally distributed populations having means uj and µ2, and suppose we obtain I = 231 I, = 199 , s1 = 6, s2 = 4. Use critical values to test the null hypothesis H0: H1 - P2 < 22 versus the alternative hypothesis H2: Hı - 42 > 22 by setting a equal to .10, .05, .01 and .001. Using the equal variance procedure, how much evidence is there that the difference between H, and pz exceeds 22? (Round your answer to 3 decimal places.) 4.053 Reject H0 at a = 0.1, 0.05, and, 0.01, very strong evidence.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
icon
Concept explainers
Question
100%

See attached question.  

**Hypothesis Testing with Independent Samples**

**Problem Statement:**

Suppose we have taken independent, random samples of sizes \( n_1 = 6 \) and \( n_2 = 8 \) from two normally distributed populations having means \( \mu_1 \) and \( \mu_2 \), and suppose we obtain:
\[ \bar{x_1} = 231 \]
\[ \bar{x_2} = 199 \]
with sample standard deviations:
\[ s_1 = 6 \]
\[ s_2 = 4 \]

We aim to use critical values to test the null hypothesis \( H_0: \mu_1 - \mu_2 \leq 22 \) versus the alternative hypothesis \( H_a: \mu_1 - \mu_2 > 22 \) by setting \( \alpha \) equal to 0.10, 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001. Using the equal variance procedure, how much evidence is there that the difference between \( \mu_1 \) and \( \mu_2 \) exceeds 22? *(Round your answer to 3 decimal places.)*

**Procedure and Results:**

We will compute the test statistic \( t \) based on the given data. 

The computed test statistic is:
\[ t = 4.053 \]

**Decision Rule:**

The decision rule involves comparing the test statistic to the critical values for the chosen significance levels (\( \alpha \)). Based on the provided information, our test results are summarized as follows:

| Test Statistic (t) | Conclusion | Significance Levels | Strength of Evidence |
|-------------------|------------|--------------------|---------------------|
| 4.053             | Reject \( H_0 \) for \( \alpha = 0.1, 0.05, 0.01, \) and \( 0.001 \) | 0.1, 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 | Very strong evidence |

**Explanation:**

- The test statistic calculated (4.053) is significantly higher than the critical values for all given significance levels (\( \alpha = 0.1, 0.05, 0.01, \) and \( 0.001 \)).
- We reject the null hypothesis \( H_0 \) in favor of the alternative hypothesis \(
Transcribed Image Text:**Hypothesis Testing with Independent Samples** **Problem Statement:** Suppose we have taken independent, random samples of sizes \( n_1 = 6 \) and \( n_2 = 8 \) from two normally distributed populations having means \( \mu_1 \) and \( \mu_2 \), and suppose we obtain: \[ \bar{x_1} = 231 \] \[ \bar{x_2} = 199 \] with sample standard deviations: \[ s_1 = 6 \] \[ s_2 = 4 \] We aim to use critical values to test the null hypothesis \( H_0: \mu_1 - \mu_2 \leq 22 \) versus the alternative hypothesis \( H_a: \mu_1 - \mu_2 > 22 \) by setting \( \alpha \) equal to 0.10, 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001. Using the equal variance procedure, how much evidence is there that the difference between \( \mu_1 \) and \( \mu_2 \) exceeds 22? *(Round your answer to 3 decimal places.)* **Procedure and Results:** We will compute the test statistic \( t \) based on the given data. The computed test statistic is: \[ t = 4.053 \] **Decision Rule:** The decision rule involves comparing the test statistic to the critical values for the chosen significance levels (\( \alpha \)). Based on the provided information, our test results are summarized as follows: | Test Statistic (t) | Conclusion | Significance Levels | Strength of Evidence | |-------------------|------------|--------------------|---------------------| | 4.053 | Reject \( H_0 \) for \( \alpha = 0.1, 0.05, 0.01, \) and \( 0.001 \) | 0.1, 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 | Very strong evidence | **Explanation:** - The test statistic calculated (4.053) is significantly higher than the critical values for all given significance levels (\( \alpha = 0.1, 0.05, 0.01, \) and \( 0.001 \)). - We reject the null hypothesis \( H_0 \) in favor of the alternative hypothesis \(
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 4 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Points, Lines and Planes
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman