Suppose the MPC is 0.60. Assume there are no crowding out or investment accelerator effects. Please answer the following questions with calculation details. (1) If the government increases expenditures by $200 billion, then by how much does aggregate demand shift to the right? (2) If the government decreases taxes by $200 billion, then by how much does aggregate demand shift to the right? (3) Are the above two results the same? Why or why not?

Suppose the MPC is 0.60. Assume there are no crowding out or investment accelerator effects. Please answer the following questions with calculation details. (1) If the government increases expenditures by $200 billion, then by how much does aggregate demand shift to the right? (2) If the government decreases taxes by $200 billion, then by how much does aggregate demand shift to the right? (3) Are the above two results the same? Why or why not?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose that the federal government decides to reduce the budget deficit and cuts government purchases by $200 billion and raise personal income taxes by $200 billion. Suppose the MPC = .5. How much and in which direction would the AD curve shift because of the government spending cut? Show your work. How much and in which direction would the AD curve shift because of the tax increase? Show your work. (Note: we know these numbers in parts A & B are not accurate quantitative assessments of the policy actions - but the exercise allows us to think about the mechanisms through which these policy actions will affect the economy.) Using the above numbers, draw the AS-AD diagram and illustrate the short-run impact of the combined policy action assuming the economy begins at potential output. Label the original equilibrium with point "A" and the new short-run equilibrium with point "B". Be sure to label the magnitude of the curve shift. Describe the impact of the policy action on…
Suppose the marginal propensity to consume is equal to 0.4. If the government lowers tax rates and tax revenue falls by $50 billion, then disposable income will increase by________ billion and consumption spending will initially increase by ________ billion (before the multiplier effect kicks in).
When Government Spending increases by $10 Billion Aggregate Demand increases by MORE than $10 Billion. Which part of Aggregate Demand increases so as to make this ripple effect, or multiplied impact, happen?
Suppose that the MPC is 0.6 and that $20 trillion of real GDP is currently being demanded. The government wants to increase real GDP demanded to $16 trillion at the given price level. By how much would it have to increase government spending to achieve this goal?
You Suppose the government increases education spending by $20 billion. If the marginal propensity to consume is 0.75, how much will total spending increase? Instructions: Round your response to one decimal place. $ billion
Consider two closed economies that are identical except for their marginal propensity to consume (MPC). Each economy is currently in equilibrium with real GDP and total expenditure equal to $100 billion, as shown by the black points on the following two graphs. Neither economy has taxes that change with income. The grey lines show the 45-degree line on each graph. The first economy's MPC is 0.5. Therefore, its initial total expenditure line has a slope of 0.5 and passes through the point (100, 100). The second economy's MPC is 0.70. Therefore, its initial total expenditure line has a slope of 0.70 and passes through the point (100, 100). Now, suppose there is an increase of $30 billion in investment in each economy. Place a green line (triangle symbol) on each of the previous graphs to indicate the new total expenditure line for each economy. Then place a black point (plus symbol) on each graph showing the new level of equilibrium output.
Using the table below to answer the following questions. Assume all values represent trillions of dollars. Construct a graph of the Aggregate planned expenditure What is the equilibrium expenditure? Explain what happens at a real GDP of $4 trillion dollars. (Note the aggregate expenditures and the effects on inventories) What are your total autonomous expenditures? What is the marginal propensity to consume? Ignoring imports and income taxes, what is the multiplier? If investment increases by $1.5 trillion, what is the change in real GDP?
Macroeconomic** In the Keynesian model, when government decreases its spending by $20 billion, and it decreases taxes by $30 billion, and the MPC is .75, by how much will total spending in the economy change? Reg. multiplier = 4, tax multiplier = -3 Would this be 4 * 20 = 80 billion? The actual answer is 10 billion which I don't get it at all. Thanks.
Fill in the missing blanks in the following table. Assume for simplicity that taxes are zero. Also assume that the values represent billions of dollars. National Income and Real GDP (Y) $12,000 $13,000 $14,000 $15,000 $16,000 In the above example, the marginal propensity to consume is In the above example, the marginal propensity to save is Consumption (C) $9,600 $10,400 $11,200 $12,000 $12,800 Saving (S) $ $ (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.) (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.) GA $ $ $
The federal government implements an expansionary fiscal policy of increased spending and decreased taxes. Policy advisors predict output will increase 4% but are surprised when only 3% growth occurs. What might account for the fact that GDP increased by less than the multiplier predicted? a. Policy advisors' calculation of MPS was too high b. The aggregate supply curve was perfectly elastic c. Foreign purchases of domestic goods was greater than expected due to a devalued currency d. Consumption increases more than expected because of the decrease in taxes e. Investment decreased due to rising interest rates
Thanks!
The economy is experiencing a $225 million inflationary gap. If the government decided to solve this macroeconomic disequilibrium using a change in taxes, would you recommend an increase or decrease in taxes? If the MPC =0.9, what magnitude of tax change would be appropriate? 1) The economy is experiencing a recessionary gap of $30 billion. If the MPC=0.75, what government spending stimulus would you recommend to move the economy back to full employment? If the MPC=0.66