Suppose the government runs fewer budget deficit and there is a decrease in the average household income. Then, The new EQ quantity of loanable funds would be indeterminate,, but the new EQ interest rate would increase. O The new EQ quantity of loanable funds would decrease, but the new EQ interest rate would be indeterminate. O The new EQ quantity of loanable funds would be indeterminate, , but the new EQ interest rate would decrease. The new EQ quantity of loanable funds would be indeterminate, but the new EQ interest rate would increase. The new EQ quantity of loanable funds would increase, but the new EQ interest rate would be indeterminate.

Suppose the government runs fewer budget deficit and there is a decrease in the average household income. Then, The new EQ quantity of loanable funds would be indeterminate,, but the new EQ interest rate would increase. O The new EQ quantity of loanable funds would decrease, but the new EQ interest rate would be indeterminate. O The new EQ quantity of loanable funds would be indeterminate, , but the new EQ interest rate would decrease. The new EQ quantity of loanable funds would be indeterminate, but the new EQ interest rate would increase. The new EQ quantity of loanable funds would increase, but the new EQ interest rate would be indeterminate.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The following table contains data on the relationship between saving and income. a. Rearrange the income and saving data into an ascending order of income and graph them on the accompanying grid. Income per Year $ Saving per Year 15,000 $ 0 10,000 5,000 20,000 1,000 -500 500 0 1,500 Rearranged Rearranged Income per Year Saving per Year
Figure 32-1 percent 8 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 $billions Refer to Figure 32-1. In the Figure shown, if the real interest rate is 6 percent, the quantity of loanable funds demanded is O A. $20 billion, and the quantity supplied is $40 billion. O B. $20 billion, and the quantity supplied is $60 billion. O C. $60 billion, and the quantity supplied is $20 billion. O D. $60 billion, and the quantity supplied is $40 billion.
Q: Draw a graph depicting the market for loanable funds and analyze the impact of open market operations when the interest rate is at or near the zero lower bound. a. Illustrate the supply and dem and for loanable funds, labeling the supply curve (S), the demand curve (D), and the initial equilibrium interest rate and quantity of loanable funds. b. Show the effect of open market operations on the supply of loanable funds, and analyze its impact on the price of loanable funds.c. Introduce a situation in which the market for loanable funds faces the zero lower bound (it may be easiest to draw a new graph for this for the purpose of clarity). d. Explain how open market operations typically influence the supply of loanable funds and interest rates in normal circumstances. e. Discuss why these operations become less effective when the interest rate is at or near the zero lower bound.
C wrong
Suppose that the demand for laonable funds for car in the Milwaukee area is $11million per month at an interest rate of 10 percent per year, $12million at an interest rate of 9 percent per year, $13million at an interest rate of 8 percent per year and so on. a. If the supply of loanable funds is fixed at $17million, what will be the equilibrium interest rate? b. If the government imposes a usury law and says that car loans cannot exceed 3 percent per year, how big will the monthly shortage (or excess demand) for car loans be? c. How big will the monthly shortage for car loans be if the usury limit is raised to 7 percent per year?
4.5
8
Hi I want to ask what will happen to the market of loanable funds and the natural level of output in long run when the government runs a budget surplus? what will the graph of the loanable funds market look like?
a. The following plot shows the 12-month percentage growth rates in real personal consumption expenditures (blue line) and in real government expenditures (red line). Do you see any evidence that the latter crowds out the former? Why or why not? 20 15 10 5 -10 -15 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 The following plot shows the 12-month percentage growth rates in real GDP (blue line) and in real government expenditures (red line). What, if any, relationship does there appear to be between these two time series? Briefly explain. Rate of Growth of C (blue) and G (red) 2003 3005 2007 2003 2013 2015 2017 2019 Rate of Growth of Y (blue) and G (red) 2011 2009 2007 2005 2013 2015 2021 2017 2023 2019 2021 2023