Suppose that we run the sliding window algorithm with SWS = 5 and RWS = 3, and no out-of-order arrivals. (a) Find the smallest value for MaxSeqNum. You may assume that it suffices to find the smallest MaxSeqNum such that if DATA[MaxSeqNum] is in the receive window, then DATA[0] can no longer arrive. (b) Give an example showing that MaxSeqNum - 1 is not sufficient. (c) State a general rule for the minimum MaxSeqNum in terms of SWS and RWS.

Suppose that we run the sliding window algorithm with SWS = 5 and RWS = 3, and no out-of-order arrivals. (a) Find the smallest value for MaxSeqNum. You may assume that it suffices to find the smallest MaxSeqNum such that if DATA[MaxSeqNum] is in the receive window, then DATA[0] can no longer arrive. (b) Give an example showing that MaxSeqNum - 1 is not sufficient. (c) State a general rule for the minimum MaxSeqNum in terms of SWS and RWS.

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Let's say that the components of U are arranged in ascending order, with U = l, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 1 O, which means that aj = i. What bit strings encompass the subsets of all odd numbers in U, all even integers in U, and all integers in U that do not exceed 5?
Consider the following loop: //Precondition: (index=x) ^ (x 2 1) ^ (y=0) while (index >1) { index = index/2; ++y; } //Postcondition: (index =1) ^ (2° < x) ^ (x<2♥+1) Suppose we have already proved the first two parts of the postcondition, that is, (index = 1) and (2Y < x). Now we are trying to prove %D the last part (x < 2y+1). If (x < 2Y+1 index) is a loop invariant, can it be used to prove (x < 2Y+1)? Explain why or why not. Yes. Because the statement (x < 2y+1 index) is true before and after loop execution. O Yes. Because it is given that (r<2+1*index) is an invariant, and (x<2+1xindex) is equivalent to (r<2+1). O No. Since index = 1, the two sides of the proof would be the same which means there is nothing to prove. Yes. Because when the loop terminates we have (index=1), so x < 2y+1index = 2y+1
RC4 has a secret internal state which is a permutation of all the possible values of the vector S and the two indices i and j a. Using a straightforward scheme to store the internal state, how many bits are used? b. Suppose we think of it from the point of view of how much information is represented by the state. In that case, we need to determine how may different states there are, then take the log to the base 2 to find out how many bits of information this represents. Using this approach, how many bits would be needed to represent the state?
9. Learn to compute a shared K session key in the Diffie-Hellman algorithm if easy-to-calculate initial parameters are given.
Consider the following truth table, which includes don't cares: ABC 0 0 0 0 0 1 O O O 1 1 100 1 0 1 1 11 1 1 0 1 1 R 1 1 X X O 0 1 X Draw a Karnaugh Map corresponding to this truth table, where R is the output. Draw boxes around the appropriate bits, following the appropriate rules for doing so. For full credit, you must draw boxes in a way that guarantees that both the number of products and the number of sums is minimized. In addition, write out the optimized sum-of-products equation corresponding to the boxes you drew.
Suppose that we run the sliding window algorithm with SWS = 5 and RWS = 3, and no out-of-order arrivals. (a) Find the smallest value for MaxSeqNum. You may assume that it suffices to find the smallest MaxSeqNum such that if DATA[MaxSeqNum] is in the receive window, then DATA[0] can no longer arrive. (b) Give an example showing that MaxSeqNum - 1 is not sufficient. (c) State a general rule for the minimum MaxSeqNum in terms of SWS and RWS.
6. Consider the technique of block codes: (a) In the case where the received codeword is not part of the given set, how can recovery be achieved from this situation? (b) What is the Hamming distance between this pair of codewords (01110, 00101)? (c) If the minimum Hamming distance is 5 between any pairs of codewords, how many bits that can be corrected and detected, respectively?
Plot the function SawtoothWave[x] over 0
Given the frame F(v1, v2,0) such taht v1= [2,3], v2= [4,5], O=(6,2), determine the point Q that has coordinates (1,2,3) in this frame.