Suppose that the U.S. government decides to charge cola producers a tax. Before the tax, 15,000 cases of cola were sold every week at a price of $4 per case. After the tax, 9,000 cases of cola are sold every week; consumers pay $5 per case, and producers receive $1 per case (after paying the tax).     The amount of tax on a case of cola is $___ per case. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $___ per case, and the burden that falls on producers is $___ per case.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
Suppose that the U.S. government decides to charge cola producers a tax. Before the tax, 15,000 cases of cola were sold every week at a price of $4 per case. After the tax, 9,000 cases of cola are sold every week; consumers pay $5 per case, and producers receive $1 per case (after paying the tax).
 
 
The amount of tax on a case of cola is $___ per case.
Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $___ per case, and the burden that falls on producers is $___ per case.
Expert Solution
Step 1

Incidence of tax alludes to the dispersion of taxation rate among producers and consumer. By and large, the two customers and producers bear a part of the taxation rate whether or not the assessment is forced on deals or production. Who bears a greater segment of the weight relies upon whether supply or demand is more versatile.

The measure of the tax rate is the contrast between the price of consumer address and the price seller get, i.e., 5 -  = $4.

The customer's burden of the tax = after price - before price

 = 5 - 4 = $1.

The producer's weight of expense = distinction in price got before and after = 4 - 1 = $3.

The impact of expense on the amount sold depends not on whether the tax is forced on producers or customers, yet on whether demand is more elastic concerning price or supply is elastic. On the off chance that demand is more flexible, at that point forcing a tax on seller would have created a bigger drop in amount. Essentially, in the event, that supply is more versatile, at that point forcing a tax on purchasers would have created a bigger drop in amount.

trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Equilibrium Point
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education