Suppose that Spain and Austria both produce rye and stained glass. Spain's opportunity cost of producing a pane of stained glass is 5 bushels of rye while Austria's opportunity cost of producing a pane of stained glass is 10 bushels of rye. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing stained glass in the two countries, you can tell that has a comparative advantage in the production of stained glass and has a comparative advantage in the production of rye. Suppose that Spain and Austria consider trading stained glass and rye with each other. Spain can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than each pane of stained glass it exports to Austria. Similarly, Austria can gain from trade as long as it receives more than of rye for of stained glass for each bushel of rye it exports to Spain. Based on your answer to the last question, which of the following prices of trade (that is, price of stained glass in terms of rye) would allow both Austria and Spain to gain from trade? Check all that apply. 9 bushels of rye per pane of stained glass n 15 bushels of rye per pane of stained glass 8 bushels of rye per pane of stained glass 3 bushels of rye per pane of stained glass

Suppose that Spain and Austria both produce rye and stained glass. Spain's opportunity cost of producing a pane of stained glass is 5 bushels of rye while Austria's opportunity cost of producing a pane of stained glass is 10 bushels of rye. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing stained glass in the two countries, you can tell that has a comparative advantage in the production of stained glass and has a comparative advantage in the production of rye. Suppose that Spain and Austria consider trading stained glass and rye with each other. Spain can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than each pane of stained glass it exports to Austria. Similarly, Austria can gain from trade as long as it receives more than of rye for of stained glass for each bushel of rye it exports to Spain. Based on your answer to the last question, which of the following prices of trade (that is, price of stained glass in terms of rye) would allow both Austria and Spain to gain from trade? Check all that apply. 9 bushels of rye per pane of stained glass n 15 bushels of rye per pane of stained glass 8 bushels of rye per pane of stained glass 3 bushels of rye per pane of stained glass

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider two neighboring island countries called Bellissima and Dolorium. They each have 4 million labor hours available per week that they can use to produce rye, jeans, or a combination of both. The following table shows the amount of rye or jeans that can be produced using 1 hour of labor. Rye Jeans Country (Bushels per hour of labor) (Pairs per hour of labor) Bellissima 12 24 Dolorium 8 32 Initially, suppose Bellissima uses 1 million hours of labor per week to produce rye and 3 million hours per week to produce jeans, while Dolorium uses 3 million hours of labor per week to produce rye and 1 million hours per week to produce jeans. Consequently, Bellissima produces 12 million bushels of rye and 72 million pairs of jeans, and Dolorium produces 24 million bushels of rye and 32 million pairs of jeans. Assume there are no other countries willing to trade goods, so, in the absence trade between these two countries, each country consumes the amount of rye and jeans it produces. v of…
2. Working with Numbers and Graphs Q9 The following table summarizes the combinations of goods X and Y that two individuals, Nicki and Kamal, can each produce individually. Nicki Kamal Y Y 300 250 150 30 125 62.5 60 125 If each person specializes in the production of the good for which they have the comparative advantage, then would specialize in the production of good Y, and would specialize in the production of good X. (Hint: Calculate the opportunity cost of producing X and Y for each individual.) Suppose that Kamal and Nicki each specializes in the production of the good in which each has a comparative advantage.
Suppose that France and Denmark both produce fish and olives. France's opportunity cost of producing a crate of olives is 3 pounds of fish while Denmark's opportunity cost of producing a crate of olives is 11 pounds of fish. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing olives in the two countries, you can tell that has a comparative advantage in the production of olives and has a comparative advantage in the production of fish. Suppose that France and Denmark consider trading olives and fish with each other. France can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than of fish for each crate of olives it exports to Denmark. Similarly, Denmark can gain from trade as long as it receives more than of olives for each pound of fish it exports to France. Based on your answer to the last question, which of the following prices of trade (that is, price of olives in terms of fish) would allow both Denmark and France to gain from trade? Check…
The production possibilities frontiers in the figure to the right show how many bananas and coconuts you (Y) and your neighbor (N) can consume without trade Suppose you are initially consuming 14 bananas and 3 coconuts and your neighbor is initially consuming 3 bananas and 9 coconuts. Now, suppose you and your neighbor specialize by each only producing the good for which you have a comparative advantage You give your neighbor half of your production for half of what he produces. (Enter all responses as integers) If you trade with your neighbor, then you will have additional coconut(s) after the trade and additional banana(s) At the same time, your neighbor will be able to consume additional banana(s) and will be as a result of trade. Quantity of coconuts 26- 2.*.*.*.*. Your PPF 12- 10- Neighbor's PPF 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 Quantity of bananas GOO
The table below for the United States and Mexico shows maximum feasible production rates per acre of wheat if no rice is produced and maximum feasible production rates per acre of rice if no wheat are produced. Assume that the opportunity costs of producing these goods are constant in both countries. Output per Acre with Trade Wheat 80 tons United States Mexico 55 tons For the United States, the opportunity cost of 1 ton of wheat is tons of rice. (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.) has a comparative advantage in wheat, and has a comparative advantage in rice. Now consider the following table that shows the production and consumption of wheat and rice if there is no trade. Output per Acre with No Trade Wheat 40.0 tons 27.5 tons United States Mexico Total output of wheat if the two countries do not trade tons. (Enter your response rounded to one decimal place.) Total output of rice if the two countries do not trade tons. (Enter your response rounded to one decimal place)…
Candonia has a comparative advantage in the production of , while Desonia has a comparative advantage in the production of . Suppose that Candonia and Desonia specialize in the production of the goods in which each has a comparative advantage. After specialization, the two countries can produce a total of
When a country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good, it means that it can produce this good at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partner. Then the country will specialize in the production of this good and trade it for other goods. The following graphs show the production possibilities frontiers (PPFs) for Glacier and Rainier. Both countries produce corn and basil, each initially (i.e., before specialization and trade) producing 18 million pounds of corn and 9 million pounds of basil, as indicated by the grey stars marked with the letter A. BASIL (Millions of pounds) 48 42 36 30 24 18 12 6 0 0 PPF 6 Glacier A 12 18 24 30 36 CORN (Millions of pounds) 42 48 ? BASIL (Millions of pounds) 48 42 36 30 24 18 12 6 0 0 PPF I + 6 Rainier 12 18 24 30 36 CORN (Millions of pounds) I 42 48 (?) Glacier has a comparative advantage in the production of while Rainier has a comparative advantage in the production of Suppose that Glacier and Rainier specialize in the production…
Suppose the United States and Mexico both produce hamburgers and tacos. The combinations of the two goods that each country can produce in one day are presented in the table below. United States Hamburgers (in tons) Mexico Tacos (in tons) Hamburgers (in tons) Tacos (in tons) 27 15 10 20 18 9 10 30 Which country has an absolute advantage in producing tacos? The United States. Which country has a comparative advantage in producing tacos? Mexico Suppose the United States is currently producing 20 tons of hamburgers and 9 tons of tacos and Mexico is currently producing 4 tons of hamburgers and 5 tons of tacos. If the United States and Mexico each specialize in producing only one good (the good for which each has a comparative advantage), then a total of additional ton(s) of hamburgers can be produced for the two countries combined (enter a numeric response using an integer)
Suppose that Poland and Wales both produce ale and glass. Poland's opportunity cost of producing a pane of glass is 4 kegs of ale while Wales's opportunity cost of producing a pane of glass is 12 kegs of ale. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing glass in the two countries, you can tell thatWales has a comparative advantage in the production of glass andPoland has a comparative advantage in the production of ale. Suppose that Poland and Wales consider trading glass and ale with each other. Poland can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than of ale for each pane of glass it exports to Wales. Similarly, Wales can gain from trade as long as it receives more than of glass for each keg of ale it exports to Poland. Based on your answer to the last question, which of the following prices of trade (that is, price of glass in terms of ale) would allow both Wales and Poland to gain from trade? Check all that apply. 8 kegs of…
When a country specializes in the production of a good, this means that it can produce this good at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partner. Because of this comparative advantage, both countries benefit when they specialize and trade with each other. The following graphs show the production possibilities frontiers (PPFS) for Maldonia and Lamponia. Both countries produce lemons and sugar, each initially (i.e., before specialization and trade) producing 24 million pounds of lemons and 12 million pounds of sugar, as indicated by the grey stars marked with the letter A. (? (?) Maldonia Lamponia 64 64 56 56 48 PPF 48 40 40 32 32 24 24 PPF 16 16 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 LEMONS (Millions of pounds) LEMONS (Millions of pounds) Maldonia has a comparative advantage in the production of production of while Lamponia has a comparative advantage in the . Suppose that Maldonia and Lamponia specialize in the production of the goods in which each has a comparative advantage.…
Suppose that an hour of work in Brazil can produce 1 pound of coffee or 4 pounds of sugar. In Colombia, an hour of work produces 2 pounds of coffee or 5 pounds of sugar. Which country has the absolute advantage in coffee? In sugar? Calculate the opportunity cost of each good in each country. Which country has the comparative advantage in each good? Why? What would be a mutually beneficial terms of trade?
When a country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good, it means that it can produce this good at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partner. Then the country will specialize in the production of this good and trade it for other goods. The following graphs show the production possibilities frontiers (PPFS) for Maldonia and Desonia. Both countries produce lemons and tea, each initially (i.e., before specialization and trade) producing 24 million pounds of lemons and 12 million pounds of tea, as indicated by the grey stars marked with the letter A. (2 Maldonia Desonia 64 64 56 56 48 PPF 48 40 40 32 32 24 24 PPF 16 16 8 8 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 LEMONS (Millions of pounds) LEMONS (Millions of pounds) TEA (Millions of pounds) TEA (Millions of pounds)