Suppose that out of the original 100 of government spending, 33 will be recycled back into purchases of domestically produced goods and services in the second round and 10.89 is spent in the third round. Following this multiplier effect, what will the value of the total aggregate expenditures be after the fourth round in the cycle is completed?

Suppose that out of the original 100 of government spending, 33 will be recycled back into purchases of domestically produced goods and services in the second round and 10.89 is spent in the third round. Following this multiplier effect, what will the value of the total aggregate expenditures be after the fourth round in the cycle is completed?

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter23: The Aggregate Expenditure Model

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 11P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

If a $100 billion increase in government spending results in a $500 billion increase in real GDP, then the value of the multiplier:
Will an economy with a high multiplier be more stable or less stable than an economy with a low multiplier in response to changes in the economy or in government policy?
Illustrate how changes in investment (or other components of total spending) can increase or decrease real GDP by the multiplier effect.
The multiplier effect occurs because
Suppose that there is an autonomous increase in investment spending of $20 billion and the MPC is given as 0.4, and assuming taxes, imports, and savings are all equal and there are no leakages: How large is the spending multiplier? Use the simple multiplier equation to calculate it. How much is the total change in GDP from this autonomous increase in investment spending? Do you think a larger or smaller MPC would help the economy, and why? What could be some concerns about the Keynesian spending multiplier?
If the current value of GDP is $13.28 trillion and the government is planning to increase spending by $800 billion (all in one year), the percentage increase in GDP using the multiplier estimate of the first economist is percent. (Round your response to two decimal places.)
Consider a hypothetical economy where there are no taxes and no foreign trade, and households spend $0.90 of each additional dollar they earn and ; the marginal propensity to save (MPS) for this save the remaining $0.10. The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) for this economy is economy is ; and the multiplier for this economy is Suppose investment spending in this economy decreases by $150 billion. The decrease in investment will lead to a decrease in income, generating a decrease in consumption that decreases income yet again, and so on. Fill in the following table to show the impact of the change in investment spending on the first two rounds of consumption spending and, eventually, on total output and income. Hint: Be sure to enter a negative sign in front of the number if there is a decrease in consumption. Change in Investment Spending = -$150 billion First Change in Consumption = $ Second Change in Consumption $ Total Change in Output = $ billion billion billion In reality,…
In the country of Krugman, a business spent $100 million building a factory. GDP eventually increased by 200 million. People spend 11% of every dollar on imports. What is the marginal propensity to consume in this economy? Write your answer as a number, between 0 and 1. If you think the answer is 0, write 0.00, not 0. Answer: Study the graph below. When will the multiplier be biggest? Select one: The multiplier will be the same size no matter what Aggregate Demand is b. The multiplier will be one no matter what aggregate demand is When aggregate demand is at AD1 d. When aggregate demand is at AD3 e When aggregate demand is at AD2 Price Level AD₁ AS e All of these are true AD₂ AD₁ GDP Why is potential output called potential, when it is not actually the most the economy can produce? Select one: a. Because potential is the most the economy can produce right now, with the technology and workers and equipment we have right now. Ob. Because economists just like to be confusing for no reason…
If disposable income is 90 percent of national income, the marginal propensity to consume ( out of disposable income) is 0.75, and imports are 25 percent of national income. What is the simple multiplier?
We know the following about a closed economy: (Y-T), • Consumption: C = 20 + 0.7 • Investment: I = 4c Government expenditures: G= 30 • Taxes: T = 0.2Y When the government increases its expenditures without changing the way it collects taxes, there is a multiplier effect. What is the value of the multiplier? Select one (two digits after the decimal): a. 2.33 b. 2.50 c. 3.33 d. 4.00
Suppose MPC equals 0.9, government taxes 30% of all incomes, and the marginal propensity to import equals 0.07. The economy's real GDP is currently $5,454 billion while its potential real GDP is $6,000 billion. GIven a horizontal SRAS curve, what change in government spending on goods and services would bring the economy to full employment real GDP? When doing the calculations, round the value for the multiplier to 2 decimal places, and round your final value for the change in G to the nearest billion.
Question #4 - Use the aggregate expenditures model to demonstrate the multiplier effect.