Suppose that Natasha's utility function is given by u()=√101, where I represents annual income in thousands of dollars. Is Natasha risk loving, risk neutral, or risk averse? Explain. A. She is risk averse because her utility function exhibits diminishing marginal utility. O B. She is risk loving because her utility function exhibits increasing marginal utility. OC. She is risk neutral because her utility function exhibits constant marginal utility. Suppose that Natasha is currently earning an income of $40,000 (/= 40) and can earn that income next year with certainty. She is offered a chance to take a new job that offers a 0.6 probability earning $44,000 and a 0.4 probability of earning $33,000. Should she take the new job? Natasha should not take the new job because her expected utility of 19.85 is less than her current utility. (Round expected utility three decimal places.)

Suppose that Natasha's utility function is given by u()=√101, where I represents annual income in thousands of dollars. Is Natasha risk loving, risk neutral, or risk averse? Explain. A. She is risk averse because her utility function exhibits diminishing marginal utility. O B. She is risk loving because her utility function exhibits increasing marginal utility. OC. She is risk neutral because her utility function exhibits constant marginal utility. Suppose that Natasha is currently earning an income of $40,000 (/= 40) and can earn that income next year with certainty. She is offered a chance to take a new job that offers a 0.6 probability earning $44,000 and a 0.4 probability of earning $33,000. Should she take the new job? Natasha should not take the new job because her expected utility of 19.85 is less than her current utility. (Round expected utility three decimal places.)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Janet's broad attitude to risk (risk averse, risk neutral, or risk loving) is independent of her wealth. She has initial wealth w and is offered the opportunity to buy a lottery ticket. If she buys it, her final wealth will be either w + 4 or w – 2, each equally likely. She is indifferent between buying the ticket and not buying it. Janet offers her friend Sam (who has identical preferences and initial wealth) the following proposition: They buy the ticket together, and share the cost and proceeds equally. Sam has another idea: They buy two tickets (that have independent outcomes) and share the costs and proceeds equally. Suppose that Janet's and Sam's utility of income is given by u(x) = In x and the initla wealth of each one of them is equal to w = 4. Which of the following statements is true? O a. Both agents prefer Sam's solutions to Janet's solution. b. Both agents prefer Janet's solutions to Sam's solution. The agents are indifferent between Janet's solutions to Sam's solution.…
!
E2
Please answer question on screenshot (which of the folowing statements....) q1) Janet offers her friend Sam (who has identical preferences and initial wealth) the following proposition: They buy the ticket together, and share the cost and proceeds equally.
Roger's utility/u as a function of wealth/w is u = { ln w, w < 1600 w1/2, w >= 1600 Roger has $1000 and 3 options. 1. spend $400 to enter the game with probabilities of winning or losing: Win/(Lose) (500) 0 1000 3000 P(Win/(Lose)) 0.2 0.1 0.6 0.1 a. Show with workings which option roger would choose.
Which of the following utility functions exhibits constant absolute risk aversion? a. U(W) =W-0.5W² b. U(W) = -e-w c. U (W) = W d. U(W) = In W
4.
Draw a utility function over income u(I) that describes a man who is a risk lover when his income is low but risk averse when his income is high. 1.) Using the 3-point curved line drawing tool, draw the low income portion of his utility function. Label it U₁. 2.) Using the 3-point curved line drawing tool, draw the high income portion of his utility function. Label it UH. Carefully follow the instructions above, and only draw the required objects. C 500- 450- 400- 350- 300- 250- 200- 150- 100- 50- 0 Utility 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 Income
When the second order derivative of a function is greater than zero than the agent is risk lover. question; Asses the risk attitude of an agent represented by the expected utility function u(x)= 2x2-5. However my course material writes that this agent is risk neutral because it is affine. My question is that whys is this so despite the fact that the second order derivative is '4' which is >0. Kindly explain this to me with complete steps.
3. A risk-neutral principal hires an agent to work on a project at wage w. The agent's utility function is: v(w)-g(e), where v(w)= Jw and g(e)=e/2 The agent can choose one of two possible effort levels, e¡ = 4 or e, = 6 . If the agent chooses effort level e, = 4 the project yields 100 with probability 1/4 and 0 with probability 3/4. If he chooses e, = 6 the project yields 100 with probability ½ and 0 with probability ½. The reservation utility of the agent is 0. (a) Suppose the effort level chosen by the agent is observable by the principal. Find the contract chosen by the principal. Show graphically in terms of contingent utilities v(w,00) and v(w.)