I need the answer for part C and the second part of D. Instructions: Manipulate numbers in the Settings window as needed to answer the following questions. You may find it helpful to click "combined" above the graph window to view each country's production on a single graph.Suppose Malaysia's production possibilities include a maximum of 80 units of rice or 120 units of lumber, and Canada's production possibilities include a maximum of 80 units of rice or 40 units of lumber. Then suppose each country initially allocates 50% of its labor to producing each product.a) Total production by the two countries equals 80 tons of rice and 80 ft3 of lumber.b) Now suppose that Malaysia increases the labor it allocates to lumber by 10%. Its lumber production rises by 12 and its rice production falls by 8 .c) If Canada reallocates its labor to increase its rice production by exactly the amount that Malaysia's rice production fell, by how much must its lumber production fall? ??? ft3d) State the combined effects on total production of the reallocations in part b and c.Total production of rice changes by 0 tons. (include a negative sign, if needed)Total production of lumber changes by ??? ft3. (include a negative sign, if needed) The image presents two production possibility frontiers (PPFs) for Malaysia and Canada, comparing their production capabilities for lumber and rice.**Malaysia's Graph:**- The vertical axis represents the amount of Lumber, with a maximum value of 280 units.- The horizontal axis represents the amount of Rice, with a maximum value of 70 units.- The PPF is represented by a purple line, indicating the trade-off between producing Lumber and Rice.- Point A (35, 140) is marked, showing a specific production scenario where Malaysia produces 35 units of Rice and 140 units of Lumber.**Canada's Graph:**- The vertical axis represents the amount of Lumber, with a maximum value of 100 units.- The horizontal axis represents the amount of Rice, with a maximum value of 300 units.- The PPF is represented by a green line, indicating the trade-off between producing Lumber and Rice.- Point B (150, 50) is marked, showing a specific production scenario where Canada produces 150 units of Rice and 50 units of Lumber.These graphs illustrate the concept of opportunity cost and how each country allocates its resources for producing two different goods, providing insights into potential advantages and strategic decisions in trade. # Production and Labor Allocation in Malaysia and Canada## Settings### Production Possibilities- **Malaysia**: - Lumber: 280 ft³ - Rice: 70 tons- **Canada**: - Lumber: 100 ft³ - Rice: 300 tons### Labor Allocation- **Lumber and Rice Labor Allocation (0–100%)**: - Malaysia (Point A): 50% for lumber, 50% for rice - Canada (Point B): 50% for lumber, 50% for rice## Calculations### Initial Production- **Malaysia**: - Lumber: 140 ft³ - Rice: 35 tons- **Canada**: - Lumber: 50 ft³ - Rice: 150 tons- **Total**: - Lumber: 190 ft³ - Rice: 185 tons### New Production(No change from initial production)- **Malaysia**: - Lumber: 140 ft³ - Rice: 35 tons- **Canada**: - Lumber: 50 ft³ - Rice: 150 tons- **Total**: - Lumber: 190 ft³ - Rice: 185 tonsThis comparison illustrates the production capabilities and labor distribution between Malaysia and Canada for lumber and rice, based on equal labor allocation in both countries.

In economics, comparative advantage is the principle that a country should specialize in producing goods and services in which it has a relatively lower opportunity cost compared to other countries. This means that a country should focus on producing goods and services that it can produce more efficiently or at a lower cost than other countries.Part c:Canada must reallocate its labor to decrease its lumber production by 6 ft3.Explanation:Malaysia's reallocation of labor from rice to lumber increases its lumber production by 12 ft3 and decreases its rice production by 8 tons. To offset this decrease in rice production, Canada must reallocate its labor to increase its rice production by 8 tons. This reallocation will also decrease Canada's lumber production by 6 ft3.To calculate the change in Canada's lumber production, we can use the following formula:Change in lumber production = (Change in rice production) / (Relative productivity in lumber)where:Change in lumber production is the change in the quantity of lumber producedChange in rice production is the change in the quantity of rice producedRelative productivity in lumber is the ratio of lumber production to rice productionIn this case, the change in rice production is -8 tons (since Canada is increasing its rice production, the change is negative). The relative productivity in lumber is 40 units of lumber per 80 units of rice (since Canada produces 40 units of lumber for every 80 units of rice it produces).Plugging these values into the formula, we get:Change in lumber production = (-8 tons) / (40 units of lumber / 80 units of rice) = -6 ft3Therefore, Canada must reallocate its labor to decrease its lumber production by 6 ft3.Part d:Total production of rice remains unchanged. Total production of lumber decreases by 6 ft3.Explanation:Malaysia's reallocation of labor from rice to lumber increases its lumber production by 12 ft3 and decreases its rice production by 8 tons. Canada's reallocation of labor offsets this decrease in rice production, so total production of rice remains unchanged.Canada's reallocation of labor decreases its lumber production by 6 ft3. This decrease in lumber production is not offset by Malaysia's increase in lumber production, so total production of lumber decreases by 6 ft3.Therefore, total production of rice remains unchanged, and total production of lumber decreases by 6 ft3.Canada must reallocate its labor to decrease its lumber production by 6 ft3.Total production of rice remains unchanged. Total production of lumber decreases by 6 ft3.