Suppose a sample of 20 engineers employed with a company for three years has been rank ordered with respect to managerial potential. Some of the engineers attended the company's management-development course, others attended an off-site management-development program at a local university, and the remainder did not attend any program. Use the following rankings. and a 0.025 to test for a significant difference in the managerial potential of the three groups. No Program 20 7 8 13. 11 14 Ho: Median NP Median ■ H: Median NP Median Company O Ho: Median NP Median 15 16 19 18 6 17 12 Medianos Medianos Medianos H₂: Median NP < Median > Medianos Off-Site 9 O Ho: Median Np Median Medianos H₁: Median NP Median - Medianos 2 4 State the null and alternative hypotheses. O Ho: All populations of managerial potential ratings are identical. H: Not all populations of managerial potential ratings are identical. 3 1 10 5 O Ho: Not all populations of managerial potential ratings are identical. H: All populations of managerial potential ratings are identical. Find the value of the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) 10.27 X Find the p-value. (Round your answer to three decimal places.) p-value = 0.001 x State your conclusion. Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in the managerial potential of the three groups. O Do not reject Ho. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in the managerial potential of the three groups. Reject Ho. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in the managerial potential of the three groups. Do not reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in the managerial potential of the three groups.
Suppose a sample of 20 engineers employed with a company for three years has been rank ordered with respect to managerial potential. Some of the engineers attended the company's management-development course, others attended an off-site management-development program at a local university, and the remainder did not attend any program. Use the following rankings. and a 0.025 to test for a significant difference in the managerial potential of the three groups. No Program 20 7 8 13. 11 14 Ho: Median NP Median ■ H: Median NP Median Company O Ho: Median NP Median 15 16 19 18 6 17 12 Medianos Medianos Medianos H₂: Median NP < Median > Medianos Off-Site 9 O Ho: Median Np Median Medianos H₁: Median NP Median - Medianos 2 4 State the null and alternative hypotheses. O Ho: All populations of managerial potential ratings are identical. H: Not all populations of managerial potential ratings are identical. 3 1 10 5 O Ho: Not all populations of managerial potential ratings are identical. H: All populations of managerial potential ratings are identical. Find the value of the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) 10.27 X Find the p-value. (Round your answer to three decimal places.) p-value = 0.001 x State your conclusion. Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in the managerial potential of the three groups. O Do not reject Ho. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in the managerial potential of the three groups. Reject Ho. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in the managerial potential of the three groups. Do not reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in the managerial potential of the three groups.
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
Transcribed Image Text:Suppose a sample of 20 engineers employed with a company for three years has been rank ordered with respect to managerial
potential. Some of the engineers attended the company's management-development course, others attended an off-site
management-development program at a local university, and the remainder did not attend any program. Use the following rankings
and a = 0.025 to test for a significant difference in the managerial potential of the three groups.
No Program
20
7
8
13
11
14
Company
O Ho: Median NP Median
Ha: Median NP + Median
15
16
19
18
6
17
12
Medianos
+ Medianos
O Ho: Median NP = Median
Medianos
H₂: Median NP < Median > Medianos
Off-Site
9
O Ho: Median NP Median Medianos
H₂: Median NP = Median = Medianos
2
4
3
State the null and alternative hypotheses.
O Ho: All populations of managerial potential ratings are identical.
H: Not all populations of managerial potential ratings are identical.
1
10
5
OH: Not all populations of managerial potential ratings are identical.
H₂: All populations of managerial potential ratings are identical.
Find the value of the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)
10.27
X
Find the p-value. (Round your answer to three decimal places.)
p-value = 0.001
X
State your conclusion.
● Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in the managerial potential of the
three groups.
O Do not reject Ho. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in the managerial
potential of the three groups.
O Reject Ho. There is not ficient evide to conclude
the three groups.
there is
ficant difference the managerial potenti of
O Do not reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in the managerial potential of
the three groups.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 7 steps with 1 images
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman