Sugarplum uses standard costing to produce a particularly popular type of candy. Sugarplum's President, Jack Macon was unhappy after reviewing the income statements for the first 3 years of business. He said, "I was told by our accountants—and in fact, I have memorized—that our breakeven volume is 31,000 units. I was happy that we reached that sales goal in each of our first 2 years. But here's the strange thing: In our first year, we sold 31,000 units and indeed we broke even. Then, in our second year we sold the same volume and had a signficant, positive operating income. I didn't complain, of course. . . but here's the bad part. In our third year, we sold 10% more candy, but our operating income dropped by nearly 90% from what it was in the second year! We didn't change our selling price or cost structure over the past 3 years and have no price, efficiency, or spending variances . . . so what's going on?!" LOADING... (Click the icon to view the absorption costing income statements for the three years.) Read the requirements LOADING... . Requirement 1. What denominator level is Sugarplum using to allocate fixed manufacturing costs to the candy? How is Sugarplum treating any favorable or unfavorable production-volume variance at the end of the year? Explain your answer briefly. The denominator level used to allocate fixed manufacturing costs is units. We can see from Sugarplum's income statements that it disposes of any production-volume variance against ▼ beginning inventory. cost of goods sold. fixed manufacturing costs. other costs. production. In 2020, 34,100 units were produced instead of the budgeted 31,000 units. This resulted in a ▼ favorable unfavorable production-volume variance; which, when written off, ▼ decreased increased gross margin. Requirement 2. How did Sugarplum's accountants arrive at the breakeven volume of 31,000 units? ÷ = Breakeven quantity 2019 ÷ = 2020 ÷ = 2021 ÷ = Requirement 3. Prepare a variable costing-based income statement for each year. Explain the variation in the variable costing operating income for each year based on contribution margin per unit and sales volume. (Complete all input fields. Enter a "0" for any zero amounts.) 2019 2020 2021 Sales (units) Revenues Variable cost of goods sold Beginning inventory Variable manufacturing costs Deduct ending inventory Variable cost of goods sold Contribution margin Fixed manufacturing costs Fixed selling and administrative costs Operating income Explain the variation in the variable costing operating income for each year based on contribution margin per unit and sales volume by completing the following table. (Complete all input fields. Enter a "0" for any zero amounts.) 2019 2020 2021 Contribution margin Total fixed costs Operating income Requirement 4. Reconcile the operating incomes under variable costing and absorption costing for each year, and use this information to explain to Jack Macon the positive operating income in 2020 and the drop in operating income in 2021. (Complete all input fields. Enter a "0" for any zero amounts. Use parentheses or a minus sign for negative differences.) Reconciliation of absorption/variable costing operating income 2019 2020 2021 (1) Absorption costing operating income (2) Variable costing operating income (3) Difference (1) - (2) (4) Fixed mfg. costs in ending inventory (Absorption) (5) Fixed mfg. costs in beginning inventory (Absorption) (6) Difference (4) - (5) Use the reconciliation table you completed above to explain to Jack Macon the positive operating income in 2020 and the drop in operating income in 2021, that is shown on the absorption costing income statement. ▼ In 2020 In 2021 , there were units in ending inventory. These units had each absorbed $59 of fixed costs per unit, which would remain as assets on Sugarplum's balance sheet until they were sold. Cost of goods sold was accordingly reduced by the production volume variance, resulting in a positive operating income even though sales were at breakeven levels. ▼ In 2020 In 2021 , production was less than sales, i.e., all of the fixed costs that were included in a prior ending inventory, flowed through COGS in this year. The contribution margin in this year, for absorption costing, shows the COGS also contains the
Sugarplum uses standard costing to produce a particularly popular type of candy. Sugarplum's President, Jack Macon was unhappy after reviewing the income statements for the first 3 years of business. He said, "I was told by our accountants—and in fact, I have memorized—that our breakeven volume is 31,000 units. I was happy that we reached that sales goal in each of our first 2 years. But here's the strange thing: In our first year, we sold 31,000 units and indeed we broke even. Then, in our second year we sold the same volume and had a signficant, positive operating income. I didn't complain, of course. . . but here's the bad part. In our third year, we sold 10% more candy, but our operating income dropped by nearly 90% from what it was in the second year! We didn't change our selling price or cost structure over the past 3 years and have no price, efficiency, or spending variances . . . so what's going on?!" LOADING... (Click the icon to view the absorption costing income statements for the three years.) Read the requirements LOADING... . Requirement 1. What denominator level is Sugarplum using to allocate fixed manufacturing costs to the candy? How is Sugarplum treating any favorable or unfavorable production-volume variance at the end of the year? Explain your answer briefly. The denominator level used to allocate fixed manufacturing costs is units. We can see from Sugarplum's income statements that it disposes of any production-volume variance against ▼ beginning inventory. cost of goods sold. fixed manufacturing costs. other costs. production. In 2020, 34,100 units were produced instead of the budgeted 31,000 units. This resulted in a ▼ favorable unfavorable production-volume variance; which, when written off, ▼ decreased increased gross margin. Requirement 2. How did Sugarplum's accountants arrive at the breakeven volume of 31,000 units? ÷ = Breakeven quantity 2019 ÷ = 2020 ÷ = 2021 ÷ = Requirement 3. Prepare a variable costing-based income statement for each year. Explain the variation in the variable costing operating income for each year based on contribution margin per unit and sales volume. (Complete all input fields. Enter a "0" for any zero amounts.) 2019 2020 2021 Sales (units) Revenues Variable cost of goods sold Beginning inventory Variable manufacturing costs Deduct ending inventory Variable cost of goods sold Contribution margin Fixed manufacturing costs Fixed selling and administrative costs Operating income Explain the variation in the variable costing operating income for each year based on contribution margin per unit and sales volume by completing the following table. (Complete all input fields. Enter a "0" for any zero amounts.) 2019 2020 2021 Contribution margin Total fixed costs Operating income Requirement 4. Reconcile the operating incomes under variable costing and absorption costing for each year, and use this information to explain to Jack Macon the positive operating income in 2020 and the drop in operating income in 2021. (Complete all input fields. Enter a "0" for any zero amounts. Use parentheses or a minus sign for negative differences.) Reconciliation of absorption/variable costing operating income 2019 2020 2021 (1) Absorption costing operating income (2) Variable costing operating income (3) Difference (1) - (2) (4) Fixed mfg. costs in ending inventory (Absorption) (5) Fixed mfg. costs in beginning inventory (Absorption) (6) Difference (4) - (5) Use the reconciliation table you completed above to explain to Jack Macon the positive operating income in 2020 and the drop in operating income in 2021, that is shown on the absorption costing income statement. ▼ In 2020 In 2021 , there were units in ending inventory. These units had each absorbed $59 of fixed costs per unit, which would remain as assets on Sugarplum's balance sheet until they were sold. Cost of goods sold was accordingly reduced by the production volume variance, resulting in a positive operating income even though sales were at breakeven levels. ▼ In 2020 In 2021 , production was less than sales, i.e., all of the fixed costs that were included in a prior ending inventory, flowed through COGS in this year. The contribution margin in this year, for absorption costing, shows the COGS also contains the
Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1Q
Related questions
Question
Sugarplum
uses Sugarplum's
President,
Jack
Macon
was unhappy after reviewing the income statements for the first 3 years of business. He said, "I was told by our
accountants—and
in fact, I have
memorized—that
our breakeven volume is
31,000
units. I was happy that we reached that sales goal in each of our first 2 years. But here's the strange thing: In our first year, we sold
31,000
units and indeed we broke even. Then, in our second year we sold the same volume and had a signficant, positive operating income. I didn't complain, of course. . . but here's the bad part. In our third year, we sold
10%
more candy, but our operating income dropped by nearly
90%
from what it was in the second year! We didn't change our selling price or cost structure over the past 3 years and have no price, efficiency, or spending variances . . . so what's going on?!"LOADING...
(ClickRead the
requirements
LOADING...
.Requirement 1. What denominator level is
manufacturing costs to the candy? How is
Sugarplum
using to allocate fixed Sugarplum
treating any favorable or unfavorable production-volume variance at the end of the year? Explain your answer briefly.
The denominator level used to allocate fixed manufacturing costs is
|
|
units.
|
We can see from
In
production-volume variance; which, when written off,
gross margin.
Sugarplum's
income statements that it disposes of any production-volume variance against
▼
beginning inventory.
cost of goods sold.
fixed manufacturing costs.
other costs.
production.
2020,
34,100
units were produced instead of the budgeted
31,000
units. This resulted in a
▼
favorable
unfavorable
▼
decreased
increased
Requirement 2. How did
Sugarplum's
accountants arrive at the breakeven volume of
31,000
units?
|
|
÷
|
|
=
|
Breakeven quantity
|
2019
|
|
÷
|
|
=
|
|
2020
|
|
÷
|
|
=
|
|
2021
|
|
÷
|
|
=
|
|
Requirement 3. Prepare a variable costing-based income statement for each year. Explain the variation in the variable costing operating income for each year based on contribution margin per unit and sales volume. (Complete all input fields. Enter a "0" for any zero amounts.)
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
Sales (units)
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
Variable cost of goods sold
|
|
|
|
Beginning inventory
|
|
|
|
Variable manufacturing costs
|
|
|
|
Deduct ending inventory
|
|
|
|
Variable cost of goods sold
|
|
|
|
Contribution margin
|
|
|
|
Fixed manufacturing costs
|
|
|
|
Fixed selling and administrative costs
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
Explain the variation in the variable costing operating income for each year based on contribution margin per unit and sales volume by completing the following table. (Complete all input fields. Enter a "0" for any zero amounts.)
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
Contribution margin
|
|
|
|
Total fixed costs
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
Requirement 4. Reconcile the operating incomes under variable costing and absorption costing for each year, and use this information to explain to
Jack
Macon
the positive operating income in
2020
and the drop in operating income in
2021.
(Complete all input fields. Enter a "0" for any zero amounts. Use parentheses or a minus sign for negative differences.)
Reconciliation of absorption/variable costing operating income
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
|
(1)
|
Absorption costing operating income
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Variable costing operating income
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Difference (1) - (2)
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Fixed mfg. costs in ending inventory (Absorption)
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
Fixed mfg. costs in beginning inventory (Absorption)
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
Difference (4) - (5)
|
|
|
|
Use the reconciliation table you completed above to explain to
Jack
Macon
the positive operating income in
2020
and the drop in operating income in
2021,
that is shown on the absorption costing income statement.▼
In 2020
In 2021
assets on Sugarplum's balance sheet until they were sold. Cost of goods sold was accordingly reduced by the production
volume variance, resulting in a positive operating income even though sales were at breakeven levels.▼
In 2020
In 2021
COGS in this year. The contribution margin in this year, for absorption costing, shows the COGS also contains the allocated
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 5 steps with 8 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337272094
Author:
WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337619202
Author:
Hall, James A.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337272094
Author:
WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337619202
Author:
Hall, James A.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…
Accounting
ISBN:
9780134475585
Author:
Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. Rajan
Publisher:
PEARSON
Intermediate Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259722660
Author:
J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M Thomas
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259726705
Author:
John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting Principles
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education