The table below lists internship details for various students. | StudentID | StudentName | EmployerID | EmployerName | PositionID | PositionDescription | |-----------|-------------|------------|--------------|------------|-----------------------------| | 111 | Joe | A | Axel Alarm | 1 | Sales Intern | | 222 | Mike | A | Axel Alarm | 2 | IT Help Desk Intern | | 333 | Sue | B | Banex Inc | 2 | Sales Intern | | 444 | Pat | B | Banex Inc | 1 | Front Desk Intern | | 555 | Bob | B | Banex Inc | 1 | Front Desk Intern | | 666 | Joe | C | Calypso Corp | 1 | Marketing Specialist Intern | This table is a record of student internships, showing unique StudentIDs, Student Names, the IDs and names of their employers, as well as the positions and descriptions of their internships.

The table below lists internship details for various students. | StudentID | StudentName | EmployerID | EmployerName | PositionID | PositionDescription | |-----------|-------------|------------|--------------|------------|-----------------------------| | 111 | Joe | A | Axel Alarm | 1 | Sales Intern | | 222 | Mike | A | Axel Alarm | 2 | IT Help Desk Intern | | 333 | Sue | B | Banex Inc | 2 | Sales Intern | | 444 | Pat | B | Banex Inc | 1 | Front Desk Intern | | 555 | Bob | B | Banex Inc | 1 | Front Desk Intern | | 666 | Joe | C | Calypso Corp | 1 | Marketing Specialist Intern | This table is a record of student internships, showing unique StudentIDs, Student Names, the IDs and names of their employers, as well as the positions and descriptions of their internships.

Similar questions

What is the degree of a relationship? Give anexample of each of the relationship degreesillustrated herein.
Generate a set of relations and functional dependencies which IS in BCNF, but IS NOT dependency preserving.Justify both conditions. Use concrete relation and attribute names, rather than just letters.
Let R be a relational schema {A, B, C, D, E, F, G} and let F be the set of functional dependencies F = {AB→C, AC→B, BC→E, BC→G, AD→E, B→D, B→G, BE→A, AE→C, AE→G}. Perform the following (i) Remove Extraneous Attributes(ii) Remove redundant Functional dependencies(iii) Find the minimal Cover
Make a hybrid merge-join variant that works in scenarios where neither relation is physically sorted but has a sorted secondary index on the joined attributes.
Consider the case of a many-to-one connection R between the entity sets A and B (see Figure 1). Consider the case in which the relationship generated from R is paired with the relationship created from A. In SQL, it is possible for attributes that are part of a foreign key constraint to be null. In SQL, explain how a limitation on the total involvement of A in R may be imposed by the use of non-null constraints.
Please explain
Convert the ER diagram to relations in the normal manner to capture as many constraints as possible, and then identify which of the answers is a relation schema. A. Dependents(ID, name, bDate) B. Employees(ID, name, street, city, state, phones, sDate, lengthEmp) C. Coverage(ID, name) D. Employees(ID, name, street, city, state, sDate, lengthEmp)