Steve orally agrees, at a family reunion picnic, to buy Bob's farm for $250,000, and all the terms of the agreement are settled. Bob agrees to let Steve come onto the property before the closing date so that Steve can renovate the farmhouse kitchen and build a new barn before he takes over formally. By the time Bob tells Steve that he has changed his mind and that he will not be completing the transaction on the closing date, Steve has spent $40,000 on the property. Under the Statute of Frauds, since their agreement was not evidenced in writing, Steve cannot enforce it in court, and cannot recover the $40,000. Steve can use the doctrine of promissory estoppel to force Bob to complete the transaction and give him the farm in exchange for $250,000. Because of the Statute of Frauds, Steve cannot get the farm, but he can sue Bob for the tort of deceit and recover the $40,000. Steve can ask a court to order specific performance of the contract because he has spent a lot of
Steve orally agrees, at a family reunion picnic, to buy Bob's farm for $250,000, and all the terms of the agreement are settled. Bob agrees to let Steve come onto the property before the closing date so that Steve can renovate the farmhouse kitchen and build a new barn before he takes over formally. By the time Bob tells Steve that he has changed his mind and that he will not be completing the transaction on the closing date, Steve has spent $40,000 on the property. Under the Statute of Frauds, since their agreement was not evidenced in writing, Steve cannot enforce it in court, and cannot recover the $40,000. Steve can use the doctrine of promissory estoppel to force Bob to complete the transaction and give him the farm in exchange for $250,000. Because of the Statute of Frauds, Steve cannot get the farm, but he can sue Bob for the tort of deceit and recover the $40,000. Steve can ask a court to order specific performance of the contract because he has spent a lot of
Chapter10: Cost Recovery On Property: Depreciation, Depletion, And Amortization
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 31P
Related questions
Question
Transcribed Image Text:Steve orally agrees, at a family reunion picnic, to buy Bob's farm for $250,000, and all
the terms of the agreement are settled. Bob agrees to let Steve come onto the
property before the closing date so that Steve can renovate the farmhouse kitchen
and build a new barn before he takes over formally. By the time Bob tells Steve that
he has changed his mind and that he will not be completing the transaction on the
closing date, Steve has spent $40,000 on the property.
Under the Statute of Frauds, since their agreement was not evidenced in writing, Steve cannot
enforce it in court, and cannot recover the $40,000.
Steve can use the doctrine of promissory estoppel to force Bob to complete the transaction and
give him the farm in exchange for $250,000.
Because of the Statute of Frauds, Steve cannot get the farm, but he can sue Bob for the tort of
deceit and recover the S40,000.
Steve can ask a court to order specific performance of the contract because he has spent a lot of
money on the property.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Individual Income Taxes
Accounting
ISBN:
9780357109731
Author:
Hoffman
Publisher:
CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT