R <> %24 FE %#3 <> <> %24 Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south higher than the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 374 of the 522 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 390 of the 563 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: :0H H1: Select an answer Select an answer Select an answer (please enter a decimal) Select an answer Select an answer Select an answer (Please enter a decimal) c. The test statistic ? O (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) d. The p-value (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) e. The p-value is ? e a f. Based on this, we should elect an answer the null hypothesis. g. Thus, the final conclusion is that O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is equal to the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. %3D O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of the 522 wildfires that were caused by humans in the south is higher than the proportion of the 563 wildfires that were caused by humans in the west. O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. > Next Question MacBook Pro TRIAL 田 4. 9- 7. 080 6
R <> %24 FE %#3 <> <> %24 Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south higher than the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 374 of the 522 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 390 of the 563 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: :0H H1: Select an answer Select an answer Select an answer (please enter a decimal) Select an answer Select an answer Select an answer (Please enter a decimal) c. The test statistic ? O (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) d. The p-value (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) e. The p-value is ? e a f. Based on this, we should elect an answer the null hypothesis. g. Thus, the final conclusion is that O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is equal to the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. %3D O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of the 522 wildfires that were caused by humans in the south is higher than the proportion of the 563 wildfires that were caused by humans in the west. O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. > Next Question MacBook Pro TRIAL 田 4. 9- 7. 080 6
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
100%
![R
<>
%24
FE
%#3
<>
<>
%24
Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south higher than the proportion of wildfires caused by
humans in the west? 374 of the 522 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans
while 390 of the 563 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be
concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance?
a. For this study, we should use
Select an answer
b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:
:0H
H1:
Select an answer
Select an answer
Select an answer (please enter a decimal)
Select an answer
Select an answer
Select an answer (Please enter a decimal)
c. The test statistic ? O
(please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)
d. The p-value
(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
e. The p-value is ? e a
f. Based on this, we should elect an answer the null hypothesis.
g. Thus, the final conclusion is that
O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence
to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is equal to
the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.
%3D
O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude
that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher than the
population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.
O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude
that the proportion of the 522 wildfires that were caused by humans in the south is higher than
the proportion of the 563 wildfires that were caused by humans in the west.
O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude
that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher than the
population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.
> Next Question
MacBook Pro
TRIAL
田
4.
9-
7.
080
6](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F894a013d-d172-4551-bded-46859655ad08%2Fcb992d58-27ae-46a1-9937-8d2d20fbd668%2Fhfloyp.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:R
<>
%24
FE
%#3
<>
<>
%24
Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south higher than the proportion of wildfires caused by
humans in the west? 374 of the 522 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans
while 390 of the 563 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be
concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance?
a. For this study, we should use
Select an answer
b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:
:0H
H1:
Select an answer
Select an answer
Select an answer (please enter a decimal)
Select an answer
Select an answer
Select an answer (Please enter a decimal)
c. The test statistic ? O
(please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)
d. The p-value
(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
e. The p-value is ? e a
f. Based on this, we should elect an answer the null hypothesis.
g. Thus, the final conclusion is that
O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence
to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is equal to
the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.
%3D
O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude
that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher than the
population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.
O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude
that the proportion of the 522 wildfires that were caused by humans in the south is higher than
the proportion of the 563 wildfires that were caused by humans in the west.
O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude
that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher than the
population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.
> Next Question
MacBook Pro
TRIAL
田
4.
9-
7.
080
6
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 8 steps with 2 images
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
Recommended textbooks for you
![MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781119256830/9781119256830_smallCoverImage.gif)
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
![Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305251809/9781305251809_smallCoverImage.gif)
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305504912/9781305504912_smallCoverImage.gif)
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781119256830/9781119256830_smallCoverImage.gif)
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
![Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305251809/9781305251809_smallCoverImage.gif)
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305504912/9781305504912_smallCoverImage.gif)
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134683416/9780134683416_smallCoverImage.gif)
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
![The Basic Practice of Statistics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781319042578/9781319042578_smallCoverImage.gif)
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
![Introduction to the Practice of Statistics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781319013387/9781319013387_smallCoverImage.gif)
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman