Source of Variation Sum Degrees of Freedom Mean p-value of Squares Square Treatments Error Total Test for any significant difference in the mean examination score for the three plants. Use a = 0.05. State the null and alternative hypotheses. O Ho: H, # H2 # Hz Hgi Hq = H2 = Hz O Ho: At least two of the population means are equal. H: At least two of the population means are different. O Ho: H1 = H2 = H3 Ha: Hy # Hz # H3 O H: Not all the population means are equal. Hgi Hy = Hz = Hz Hoi Hy = Hz = Hz H3: Not all the population means are equal. Find the value of the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) Find the p-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) p-value = State your conclusion. O Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the means for the three plants are not equal. Do not reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the means for the three plants are not equal. O Reject Ho. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the means for the three plants are not equal. O Do not reject Ho. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the means for the three plants are not equal.

Source of Variation Sum Degrees of Freedom Mean p-value of Squares Square Treatments Error Total Test for any significant difference in the mean examination score for the three plants. Use a = 0.05. State the null and alternative hypotheses. O Ho: H, # H2 # Hz Hgi Hq = H2 = Hz O Ho: At least two of the population means are equal. H: At least two of the population means are different. O Ho: H1 = H2 = H3 Ha: Hy # Hz # H3 O H: Not all the population means are equal. Hgi Hy = Hz = Hz Hoi Hy = Hz = Hz H3: Not all the population means are equal. Find the value of the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) Find the p-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) p-value = State your conclusion. O Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the means for the three plants are not equal. Do not reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the means for the three plants are not equal. O Reject Ho. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the means for the three plants are not equal. O Do not reject Ho. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the means for the three plants are not equal.

Name: A company manufactures printers and fax machines at plants located in
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:07:12.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: A company manufactures printers and fax machines at plants located in Atlanta, Dallas, and Seattle. To measure how much employees at these plants know about quality management, a random sample of 6employees was selected from each plant and the emplo

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

neat and clean answer please
Person 1 Person 2 Person 3 Person 4 Person 5 Person 6 Person 7 Person 8 Person 9 Height (inches) 75 62 64 63 62 70 69 70 67 Weight (lbs) 325 250 280 220 235 265 200 365 175 (CLO 2) Test a claim that the mean height of people you know is not equal to 64 inches using the p-value method or the traditional method. State H0 and H1. Find the p-value or critical value(s). Draw a conclusion. (CLO 3) Find the correlation coefficient between height and weight. Construct the equation of the regression line and use it to predict the weight of a person who is 68 inches tall.
You are playing a dice game with a friend and become suspicious that he is using weighted dice. So you stop the game, take one of his dice, and roll it 100 times. The results are in the table below. Do these results provide significant evidence that the proportion of times the dice lands on the six numbers are unequal? Calculate the chi-squared test statistic and the range the p-value falls in for this test. Number on die 1 2 4 Frequency 16 21 6 26 13 18 test statistic = 14.12, p-value in (.01, .025) test statistic = 24.368, p-value in (.005, .01) test statistic = 14.12, p-value in (.025, 05) test statistic = 24.368, p-value less than .005 O none of these
Aspirin III: Decision and Conclusion Regarding the experiment in the data frame Aspirin from the abd package, the researchers wanted to know whether or not taking aspirin affects one's risk of developing cancer. Recall that they defined their parameters as follows: p1 = the proportion of ALL individuals who would develop cancer, if all of them were to take aspirin like the subjects in the Aspirin group did. p2 = the proportion of ALL individuals who would develop cancer, if all of them were to take a placebo, like the subjects in the placebo group did. They ran the code for a two-sided significance test and got the following results: ## ## ## Inferential Procedures for the Difference of Two Proportions p1-p2:## cancer grouped by treatment ## ## ## Descriptive Results:## ## yes n estimated.prop## Aspirin 1438 19934 0.07214## Placebo 1427 19942 0.07156## ## ## Inferential Results:## ## Estimate of p1-p2: 0.0005805 ## SE(p1.hat - p2.hat): 0.002586 ## ##…
If we want to compare average charges for males and females, we would use O two sample z- test O single sample t-test O Correlation OTwo sample t-test
neat and clean answer pleasev
Please include the critical value/s with its interpretation, the p-value and its interpretation. Only a very basic and little work-through is required for all steps. Thank you
IQ scores for three different blood lead levels was measured. If we use three categories of blood lead levels with measured verbal IQ scores, we get the computer output which is summarized in table form. Using a 0.05 significance test, test the claim that the three categories of blood lead level have the same mean verbal IQ score. Does exposure to lead appear to have an effect on verbal IQ scores? Interpret the table below. Source of variation df Sum of squares Mean squares Computed f p-value LEAD 2 142 71 0.39 0.677 Error 118 21441 182 Total 120 21584
Use the following R output to answer the question. Use the following R output to answer the question. >chisq.test(data) Pearsons Chi-square test data:data X-squared=4.7194, df=2, p-value=0.09445 If the significance level is 5%, what conclusion can you make? Group of answer choices A. fail to reject the alternative hypothesis B. cannot determine C. fail to reject the null hypothesis D. reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis
help with 3
Need help on the last part
Really need help! Thank