Some people argue that we need “more proof ” or “betterscience” before we commit to changes in our energyeconomy. How much certainty do you think we needbefore we take action regarding climate change? Howmuch certainty do you need in your own life before youmake a major decision? Should nations and elected officialsfollow a different standard? Do you feel that theprecautionary principle (pp. 155, 220) is an appropriatestandard in the case of global climate change? Why orwhy not?

Some people argue that we need “more proof ” or “betterscience” before we commit to changes in our energyeconomy. How much certainty do you think we needbefore we take action regarding climate change? Howmuch certainty do you need in your own life before youmake a major decision? Should nations and elected officialsfollow a different standard? Do you feel that theprecautionary principle (pp. 155, 220) is an appropriatestandard in the case of global climate change? Why orwhy not?

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter1: The Role And Method Of Economics

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Can economics help us to understand, and deal with, the prospect of climate change dueto human activities?Your answer should include reference to at least three of the following aspects of theproblem:a) A carbon tax vs cap and tradeb) The UK’s legal commitment to reduce net carbon emissions to zero by 2050c) Assessing costs to future generationsd) Bargaining over climate changee) Environmental dynamics
Please solve a Suppose that without a seat belt, drivers who travel at 0 m.p.h. (mile per hour) have a 100% chance of staying alive, while drivers who travel at 100 m.p.h. have 0% chance of staying alive. Suppose that with a seat belt, drivers who travel at 0 m.p.h. have a 100% chance of staying alive, drivers who travel at 100 m.p.h. have a 50 % chance of staying alive and drivers who travel at 200 m.p.h. has no chance of staying alive. (a) Suppose a driver prefers more chances of staying alive to less, driving faster than slower. Draw and indifference curve diagram relating safety (measured by chance of staying alive) on the horizontal axis and speed (measured in m.p.h.) on the vertical. Draw the budget constraints of a driver with a seat belt and a driver without a seat belt. (You may assume these constraints are straight lines.) (b) True or False: If speed and safety are both normal goods, then the invention of seat belts will certainly make people drive faster, but might or might…
As a student of economics, what business can you recommend in this pandemic crisis COVID 2019 and why?
The world in which we live is complex and to understand it, human beings make use of some orother simplification process. A theory can accordingly be seen as an attempt to simplify things.Such an observation may come as a surprise to those who have often heard remarks to the effectthat such and such a theory is difficult, or at the least terribly complicated. We should neverthelessremind ourselves that a theory involves an attempt to simplify things – it is the world out there thatis the complicated entity. A particular theory (or model) is merely trying to reduce it to manageableproportions, at least as far as understanding our environment is concerned.”In economics, theory is presented in a simple form by making the…1.23a) Post hoc assumptionb) Fallacy of compositionc) Ceteris paribus assumptiond) Blinkered approach
Critically analyse the macroeconomic and financial effects of climate change. How do these effectsdiffer between the Global South and the Global North?
What are the two main approaches to tackle the problem of global warming and climate change? Next, compare the two approaches along the following dimension: Based on the current state of scientific and economic knowledge, which of the two types of policy is most likely to be cost-effective? Does it mean it will be used? Explain.
Review the numbers for Canada and Venezuelafrom Table 33.12 which describes how many barrelsof oil and tons of lumber the workers can produce. Usethese numbers to answer the rest of this question.a. Draw a production possibilities frontier for eachcountry. Assume there are 100 workers in eachcountry. Canadians and Venezuelans desire bothoil and lumber. Canadians want at least 2,000tons of lumber. Mark a point on their productionpossibilities where they can get at least 3,000tons.b. Assume that the Canadians specializecompletely because they figured out they havea comparative advantage in lumber. They arewilling to give up 1,000 tons of lumber. Howmuch oil should they ask for in return for thislumber to be as well off as they were with notrade? How much should they ask for if theywant to gain from trading with Venezuela? Note:We can think of this “ask” as the relative price ortrade price of lumber.c. Is the Canadian “ask” you identified in (b) alsobeneficial for Venezuelans? Use the…
Imagine a scenic canyon, visited by many local people as well as tourists from beyondthe local area. Consider a scenario in which a mining company has proposed to the localauthority that it be closed to the public and put into the production of coal. Thinking interms of economics as a way of adjudicating the relative value of one use of the canyon overthe other, what would you need to know in order to make a comparison or assessment?What kinds of quantitative data would inform your decision, and where might they comefrom? What kinds of things might you need to know that are hard to measure? Once youhave listed the kinds of information and data that might be available to inform this decision, do you think it would be sufficient to making this decision, why or why not?
What is the difference between a positive and a normative statement?
Is this correct
How important the tools of economics in this time of pandemic
You just got a job in Washington, D.C. You moveinto an apartment with some acquaintances. All yourroommates, however, are slackers and do not clean upafter themselves. You, on the other hand, can clean fasterthan each of them. You determine that you are 70%faster at dishes and 10% faster with vacuuming. All ofthese tasks have to be done daily. Which jobs shouldyou assign to your roommates to get the most free timeoverall? Assume you have the same number of hours todevote to cleaning. Now, since you are faster, you seemto get done quicker than your roommate. What sortsof problems may this create? Can you imagine a traderelated analogy to this problem?