Shimada Products Corporation of Japan is anxious to enter the electronic calculator market. Management believes that in order to be competitive in world markets, the price of the electronic calculator that the company is developing cannot exceed $65. Shimada's required rate of return is 21% on all investments. An investment of $3,500,000 would be required to purchase the equipment needed to produce the 48,000 calculators that management believes can be sold each year at the $65 price. Required: Compute the target cost of one calculator.

Ang Electronics, Incorporated, has developed a new mesh network. If successful, the present value of the payoff (when the product is brought to market) is $34.9 million. If the mesh network fails, the present value of the payoff is $12.9 million. If the product goes directly to market, there is a 50 percent chance of success. Alternatively, the company can delay the launch by one year and spend $1.39 million to test market the mesh network. Test marketing would allow the firm to improve the product and increase the probability of success to 80 percent. The appropriate discount rate is 11 percent. Calculate the NPV of going directly to market and the NPV of test marketing before going to market. (Do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answers in dollars, not millions of dollars, rounded to the nearest whole number, e.g., 1,234, 567.) PLEASE GIVE WHOLE NUMBERS Go to market now first Test marketing

Humbolt Shipping Line, Ltd. based in Hamburg, Germany, must continually make significant capital investments in ships. Some of these decisions require comparisons of strategic alternatives. For example, not all of the company’s ships are the same size. Different-sized ships offer alternative advantages and disadvantages. Suppose the company is currently trying to decide between two investment options. It is weighing the purchase of three extremely large ships for a total of €2,500,000 versus five smaller ships for a total of €1,400,000. Information regarding these two alternatives is provided below:   Three larger shipd Five smaller ships Initial investment 2,500,000€ 1,400,000€ Estimated useful life 20 years 20 years Annual revenues(accural) 500,000 € 380,000€ Annual expenses(accural) 200,000€ 180,000€ Annual cash inflows 550,000€ 430,000€ Annual cash outflows 222,250€ 206,350€ Estimated salvage value* 500,000€ 0€ Discount rate  9% 9%   Instructions…

Humbolt Shipping Line, Ltd. based in Hamburg, Germany, must continually make significant capital investments in ships. Some of these decisions require comparisons of strategic alternatives. For example, not all of the company’s ships are the same size. Different-sized ships offer alternative advantages and disadvantages. Suppose the company is currently trying to decide between two investment options. It is weighing the purchase of three extremely large ships for a total of €2,500,000 versus five smaller ships for a total of €1,400,000. Information regarding these two alternatives is provided below:     Three larger shipd Five smaller ships Initial investment 2,500,000€ 1,400,000€ Estimated useful life 20 years 20 years Annual revenues(accural) 500,000 € 380,000€ Annual expenses(accural) 200,000€ 180,000€ Annual cash inflows 550,000€ 430,000€ Annual cash outflows 222,250€ 206,350€ Estimated salvage value* 500,000€ 0€ Discount rate  9% 9%   Instructions…

Humbolt Shipping Line, Ltd. based in Hamburg, Germany, must continually make significant capital investments in ships. Some of these decisions require comparisons of strategic alternatives. For example, not all of the company’s ships are the same size. Different-sized ships offer alternative advantages and disadvantages. Suppose the company is currently trying to decide between two investment options. It is weighing the purchase of three extremely large ships for a total of €2,500,000 versus five smaller ships for a total of €1,400,000. Information regarding these two alternatives is provided below:                                                  Three Larger Ships         Five Smaller Ships Initial investment                          €2,500,000                             €1,400,000 Estimated useful life                      20 years                                 20 years Annual revenues (accrual)            €  500,000                               €  380,000 Annual expenses…

Hemmingway, Inc. is considering a $5 million research and development (R&D) project. Profit projections appear promising, but Hemmingway’s president is concerned because the probability that the R&D project will be successful is only 0.50. Furthermore, the president knows that even if the project is successful, it will require that the company build a new production facility at a cost of $20 million in order to manufacture the product. If the facility is built, uncertainty remains about the demand and thus uncertainty about the profit that will be realized. Another option is that if the R&D project is successful, the company could sell the rights to the product for an estimated $25 million. Under this option, the company would not build the $20 million production facility. The decision tree follows. The profit projection for each outcome is shown at the end of the branches. For example, the revenue projection for the high demand outcome is $59 million. However, the cost of the R&D project ($5 million) and the cost of the production facility ($20 million) show the profit of this outcome to be $59 – $5 – $20 = $34 million. Branch probabilities are also shown for the chance events. Analyze the decision tree to determine whether the company should undertake the R&D project. If it does, and if the R&D project is successful, what should the company do? What is the expected value of your strategy? What must the selling price be for the company to consider selling the rights to the product? Develop a risk profile for the optimal strategy.

An oil and gas company wants to decide whether to initiate a new project. The success of the project depends heavily on the state of the economy, which has a 50/50 chance of being strong enough to support the venture. The project will require an initial investment of $1 Billion dollars, and the company expects to earn $500 Millions in annual revenues from the project—unless the economy goes into recession, in which case the project will return only $100 Millions per year. The company requires a 17% return on its investments. Should it undertake the project? If the company decides to wait a year, the economy has a 75% chance of improving sufficiently to ensure $500 Millions in annual returns. Does it make sense to wait for a year before making the investment? Use the options model approach to project evaluation to answer these two questions.

Micheal’s Machinery is a German multinational manufacturing company. Currently, Micheal’s financial planners are considering undertaking a 1-year project in the United States. The project's expected dollar-denominated cash flows consist of an initial investment of $2000 and a cash inflow the following year of $2400. Micheal’s estimates that its risk-adjusted cost of capital is 12%. Currently, 1 U.S. dollar will buy 0.7 Germany. In addition, 1-year risk-free securities in the United States are yielding 6.5%, while similar securities in Germany’s are yielding 4.5%. If this project was instead undertaken by a similar U.S.-based company with the same risk-adjusted cost of capital, what would be the net present value and rate of return generated by this project? Round your answers to two decimal places. What is the expected forward exchange rate 1 year from now? Round your answer to two decimal places. If Micheal undertakes the project, what is the net present value and rate of return of…

OptiLux is considering investing in an automated manufacturing system. The system requires an initial investment of $4 million, has a 20-year life, and will have zero salvage value. If the system is implemented, the company will save $500,000 per year in direct labor costs. The company requires a 10% return from its investments. 1. Compute the proposed investment’s net present value. 2. Using your answer from part 1, is the investment’s internal rate of return higher or lower than 10%?

Tyler, Inc., is considering switching to a new production technology. The cost of the required equipment will be $3,529,783 . The discount rate is 13.99 percent. The cash flows that the firm expects the new technology to generate are as follows. a. Compute the payback and discounted payback periods for the project.  b. What is the NPV for the project? Should the firm go ahead with the project?  c. What is the IRR, and what would be the decision based on the IRR?  Years   CF     0   $(3,529,783)     1-2   0     3-5   $916,204     6-9   $1,590,056