Shera Corporation has extensive liabilities denominated in pounds resulting from imports from UK. However, Shera's revenues are denominated solely in U.S. dollars. Which of the following is probably not true? A. Shera would benefit from a depreciation of the British pound. B. Shera has at least some economic exposure. C. All of the options are true. D. Shera has at least some transaction exposure. E. Shera has at least some translation exposure.

Shera Corporation has extensive liabilities denominated in pounds resulting from imports from UK. However, Shera's revenues are denominated solely in U.S. dollars. Which of the following is probably not true? A. Shera would benefit from a depreciation of the British pound. B. Shera has at least some economic exposure. C. All of the options are true. D. Shera has at least some transaction exposure. E. Shera has at least some translation exposure.

International Financial Management

14th Edition

ISBN:9780357130698

Author:Madura

Publisher:Madura

Chapter12: Managing Economic Exposure And Translation Exposure

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3ST

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider a US-based MNC with a wholly owned Italian subsidiary. Following a depreciation of the dollar against the euro, which of the following conclusions are correct? Group of answer choices a. The cash flow in euros could be altered due a change in the firm's competitive position in the marketplace. b. A given operating cash flow in euros will be converted to a higher US dollar cash flow. c. Both A and B d. None of the above
Golden Ltd is an exporting company and it will have receivables in Malaysian ringgit in coming years. It expects the Malaysian ringgit to depreciate against the US dollar over time. It wants to get rid of its transaction exposure by denominating the exports in US dollars but that it is still subject to operating exposure. The long-term hedging techniques are constrained and it does not know how much Malaysian ringgit it will receive in the future, so it is difficult even if a long-term hedging method was available. How can Golden Ltd lessen its exposure in the case?
Suppose InBev Corporation (a non-U.S. MNC) buys Anheuser-Busch Corporation (a U.S. corporation) by paying the U.S. shareholders in cash. Which of the following can be said of the US capital account? Group of answer choices The acquisition of cash by US shareholders will decrease foreign ownership, which will be recorded as a debit. The US federal reserve will increase its currency reserves. InBev's reduction in cash will be recorded as a debit on the U.S. capital account.. InBev's increased ownership of US assets is recorded as a credit. U.S. shareholders increased ownership in InBev will be recorded as a credit.
Shava specializes in cross-rate arbitrage. He notices the following quotes: Swiss franc/dollar = SFr1.5987/$ Australian dollar/U.S. dollar = A$1.8233/$ Australian dollar/Swiss franc = A$1.1452/SFr Ignoring transaction costs, does Shava have an arbitrage opportunity based on these quotes? If there is an arbitrage opportunity, what steps would he take to make an arbitrage profit, and how much would he profit if he has $1,000,000 available for this purpose?
From the U.S. standpoint, a capital outflow will occur when a Japanese investor buys a portion of the U.S. government debt. True False
Suppose that Salem Co, a U.S.-based MNC that both purchases supplies from Canada and sells exports in Canada, is seeking to measure the economic exposure of its cash flows. Salem wishes to analyze how its cash flows might change under different exchange rates for the Canadian dollar (the only foreign currency in which it deals). Salem believes that the value of the Canadian dollar will be $0.70, $0.75, or $0.80, and seeks to analyze its cash flows under each of these scenarios. The following table shows Salem’s cash flows under each of these exchange rates. Use the table to answer the question that follows. Exchange Rate Scenario Exchange Rate Scenario Exchange Rate Scenario C$1=$0.70 C$1=$0.75 C$1=$0.80 (Millions) (Millions) (Millions) Sales (1) U.S. Sales $315 $315 $315 (2) Canadian Sales $3.50 $4.00 $4.00 (3) Total Sales in U.S. $ $318.50 $318.75 $319.00 Cost of Materials and Operating Expenses (4)…
The foreign subsidiary of a U.S. firm is profitable when profits are measured in the foreign currency but those profits become losses when measured in U.S. dollars. This is an example of which one of the following? A. Interest rate disparities B. Short-run exposure to exchange rate risk C. Long-run exposure to exchange rate risk D. Political risk associated with the foreign operations E. Translation exposure to exchange rate risk
Which is the most simple way that is able to protect a U.S firm's earnings of its consolidated income statement in the depreciation of euro relative to U.S. dollar? A. Selling euros forward in the foreign exchange market. B. Partner with the local firm of the oversea market. C. Purchasing euros forward in the foreign exchange market. D. Establish a subsidiary in the oversea economy.
Pulaski Inc. wants to establish a new subsidiary in Colombia that will sell cell phones to Colombian customers and remit earnings back to the U.S. parent. The value of this project will be favorably affected if the value of the peso ____ while it establishes the new subsidiary and ____ when the subsidiary starts operations. appreciates; appreciates depreciates; appreciates appreciates; depreciates depreciates; depreciates
Doug Bernard specializes in cross-rate arbitrage. He notices the following quotes: Swiss franc/dollar = SFr1.6077/$ Australian dollar/U.S. dollar = A$1.8345/$ Australian dollar/Swiss franc = A$1.1521/SFr Ignoring transaction costs, does Doug Bernard have an arbitrage opportunity based on these quotes? If there is an arbitrage opportunity, what steps would he take to make an arbitrage profit, and how much would he profit if he has $1,000,000 available for this purpose?
PT Gas Co is a large multinational company in the UK with a number of subsidiary companies around the world. One of the subsidiary is Laxamana Co which is based in US. PT Gas Co is owing to Laxamana Co amounted to US$2.4 million. PT Gas Co want to hedge against the USD strengthening against the £ because if the £ depreciates against the USD, then the PT Gas Co has to spend more £ to buy the USD later at the end of 3 months. Other information available are: 1. Current exchange rate (US$/£1): Spot 5962 3-month futures 1.6037 2. Contract size £62,500 3. In 90 days’ time the spot is 1.6213 $/£ 4. Assume that the basis is zero at the maturity of the futures contract Advise PT Gas Co the hedging strategies for the US$ cash flow that is due to pay in three months to Laxamana Co using currency futures. Show all the relevant calculations.
The ABC Corporation is a U.S. exporter that invoices its exports to the United Kingdom in British pounds. If it expects that the pound will depreciate against the dollar in the future, should it hedge its exports with a forward contract? Explain.