Section C. Research scenarios. Read the following scenario describing a research project, and then write a short criticism of this project. You should clearly identify at least four aspects of the project which you believe are incorrect or poor. These may relate to the research question, the experimental design, the analysis and reporting, and/or any ethical or academic misconduct issues. For each criticism which you identify, clearly describe the problem and state how it should have been addressed to improve the quality of the research. Question 15. A company providing on-line teaching software claims that students who are on-line students achieve better results on learning programming languages than on campus students. The company has developed a hypothesis based on this claim. The company chose one university to conduct research to test this hypothesis. The company applied for research ethics clearance and was granted it. At the end of semester, both on-line and on campus students undertook the same exam on programming languages. The company used final scores of all students to test its hypothesis. The company has published a report in which it concludes “the average score of 70 for on-line students is higher than the average score of 67.5 for on campus students, and so we can conclude that on-line students achieve better results in learning programming languages than on campus students. Therefore, this teaching method should be used for all students in future.”
Section C. Research scenarios.
Read the following scenario describing a research project, and then write a short criticism of this project. You should clearly identify at least four aspects of the project which you believe are incorrect or poor. These may relate to the research question, the experimental design, the analysis and reporting, and/or any ethical or academic misconduct issues. For each criticism which you identify, clearly describe the problem and state how it should have been addressed to improve the quality of the research.
Question 15.
A company providing on-line teaching software claims that students who are on-line students achieve better results on learning
At the end of semester, both on-line and on campus students undertook the same exam on programming languages. The company used final scores of all students to test its hypothesis. The company has published a report in which it concludes “the average score of 70 for on-line students is higher than the average score of 67.5 for on campus students, and so we can conclude that on-line students achieve better results in learning programming languages than on campus students. Therefore, this teaching method should be used for all students in future.”
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
