s should have the same mass since the values stamped on the wrappers by ufacturers are the same, which are both 80.0 ± 0.2 g. digital scale in one of the physics labs, the student weighed 10 chocolate bars brand, and averaged the results for both and recorded the results in their k as: ton bar: (79.6 ± 0.2) g ke bar: (79.7 ± 0.1) g f the following statements best describes the comparison between the two chocolate bars masses, as well as the stamped value? e is not enough information given to compare the two chocolate bars with other, or the stamped value. e is not enough information given to compare the two chocolate bars with other but they can be compared to the stamped value on the wrappers. values for the two bars agree with each other, and the stamped value. rly, the digital scale the student used was not working correctly, throwing off esults, thus we can not compare the answer of the bars nor with their ped value. values for the two hars agrees with each other but neither bar agrees with
s should have the same mass since the values stamped on the wrappers by ufacturers are the same, which are both 80.0 ± 0.2 g. digital scale in one of the physics labs, the student weighed 10 chocolate bars brand, and averaged the results for both and recorded the results in their k as: ton bar: (79.6 ± 0.2) g ke bar: (79.7 ± 0.1) g f the following statements best describes the comparison between the two chocolate bars masses, as well as the stamped value? e is not enough information given to compare the two chocolate bars with other, or the stamped value. e is not enough information given to compare the two chocolate bars with other but they can be compared to the stamped value on the wrappers. values for the two bars agree with each other, and the stamped value. rly, the digital scale the student used was not working correctly, throwing off esults, thus we can not compare the answer of the bars nor with their ped value. values for the two hars agrees with each other but neither bar agrees with
College Physics
11th Edition
ISBN:9781305952300
Author:Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Publisher:Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Chapter1: Units, Trigonometry. And Vectors
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1CQ: Estimate the order of magnitude of the length, in meters, of each of the following; (a) a mouse, (b)...
Related questions
Topic Video
Question

Transcribed Image Text:Question 26
Out of curiosity, a physics student checks the mass of their favorite chocolate bar, the
Newton bar, and compares it to its biggest rival, the Hooke bar. The student notes that
both bars should have the same mass since the values stamped on the wrappers by
the manufacturers are the same, which are both 80.0 0.2 g.
Using a digital scale in one of the physics labs, the student weighed 10 chocolate bars
for each brand, and averaged the results for both and recorded the results in their
notebook as:
the Newton bar: (79.6 ± 0.2) g
the Hooke bar: (79.7 ± 0.1) g
Which of the following statements best describes the comparison between the two
different chocolate bars masses, as well as the stamped value?
O There is not enough information given to compare the two chocolate bars with
each other, or the stamped value.
There is not enough information given to compare the two chocolate bars with
each other but they can be compared to the stamped value on the wrappers.
) The values for the two bars agree with each other, and the stamped value.
O Clearly, the digital scale the student used was not working correctly, throwing off
the results, thus we can not compare the answer of the bars nor with their
stamped value.
O The values for the two bars agrees with each other, but neither bar agrees with
the stamped value.
) The student clearly did something wrong since they did not get the same results
as was stamped on the wrapper, thus they should redo the experiment to get the
correct value for the mass.
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, physics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you

College Physics
Physics
ISBN:
9781305952300
Author:
Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

University Physics (14th Edition)
Physics
ISBN:
9780133969290
Author:
Hugh D. Young, Roger A. Freedman
Publisher:
PEARSON

Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
Physics
ISBN:
9781107189638
Author:
Griffiths, David J., Schroeter, Darrell F.
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press

College Physics
Physics
ISBN:
9781305952300
Author:
Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

University Physics (14th Edition)
Physics
ISBN:
9780133969290
Author:
Hugh D. Young, Roger A. Freedman
Publisher:
PEARSON

Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
Physics
ISBN:
9781107189638
Author:
Griffiths, David J., Schroeter, Darrell F.
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press

Physics for Scientists and Engineers
Physics
ISBN:
9781337553278
Author:
Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Lecture- Tutorials for Introductory Astronomy
Physics
ISBN:
9780321820464
Author:
Edward E. Prather, Tim P. Slater, Jeff P. Adams, Gina Brissenden
Publisher:
Addison-Wesley

College Physics: A Strategic Approach (4th Editio…
Physics
ISBN:
9780134609034
Author:
Randall D. Knight (Professor Emeritus), Brian Jones, Stuart Field
Publisher:
PEARSON