Riaz has a limited income and consumes only Apple and Bread. His current consumption choice is 3 apples and 5 bread. The price of apple is $3 each, and the price of bread is $2.5 each. The last apple added 5 units to Sadid's utility, while the last bread added 7 units. Is Riaz making the utility-maximizing choice? Why or why not? Do you suggest any adjustment in Riaz's consumption bundle? Why or why not? Give reasons in support of your answer.State the condition for a consumer's utility maximizing choice and illustrate graphically.

Riaz has a limited income and consumes only Apple and Bread. His current consumption choice is 3 apples and 5 bread. The price of apple is $3 each, and the price of bread is $2.5 each. The last apple added 5 units to Sadid's utility, while the last bread added 7 units. Is Riaz making the utility-maximizing choice? Why or why not? Do you suggest any adjustment in Riaz's consumption bundle? Why or why not? Give reasons in support of your answer.State the condition for a consumer's utility maximizing choice and illustrate graphically.

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter10: Consumer Choice Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The budget set, or budget constraint, in the graph shows the possible combinations of brownies and ice cream cones that can be purchased. Assume that this person has a total of $18 to spend on brownies and ice cream cones. How much does a brownie cost? $ Assume that at point A, the marginal utility from a brownie is 10 and the marginal utility for an ice cream cone is 18. This person is utility maximizing. should consume more brownies and fewer ice cream cones. should consume more ice cream cones and fewer brownies. Brownies 18- 16- 14- 12- 10- 8- 6- 4 2. 0 1 2 3 1 A 1 + 4 5 Budget constraint 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Ice cream cones
Suppose utility can be measured by "utils" and that Jim buys both coffee and bagels. The price of coffee is $2 and the price of a bagel is $3. If Jim is currently consuming coffee and bagels such that the marginal utility from the last cup of coffee consumed was 6 utils and the marginal utility from the last bagel consumed was 12 utils, is Jim maximizing utility? Why or why not? If not, what should Jim do? Explain in detail.
Q. Bridget has a limited income and consumes only wine and cheese; her current consumption choice is four bottles of wine and 10 pounds of cheese. The price of wine is $10 per bottle and the price of cheese is $4 per pound. The last bottle of wine added 50 units to Bridget's utility, while the last pound of cheese added 40 units. a. Is Bridget making the utility-maximizing choice? Why or Why not? b. If not, what should she do instead? Why? Please provide the correct answer. Thank you!
The budget set, or budget constraint, in the graph shows the possible combinations of brownies and ice cream cones that can be purchased. Assume that this person has a total of $18 to spend on brownies and ice cream cones. How much does a brownie cost? $ Assume that at point A, the marginal utility from a brownie is 10 and the marginal utility for an ice cream cone is 18. This person should consume more brownies and fewer ice cream cones. is utility maximizing. should consume more ice cream cones and fewer brownies.
In Philip's world, only two goods give him utility: economics books (B) and computer games (G). His monthly budget is $100, while a book costs $5 and a game costs $10.
Lisa consumes only two goods, pizzas and burritos. In equilibrium, her marginal utility per slice of pizza is 10 and her marginal utility per burrito is 8. Instructions: Enter your answer rounded to two decimal places. If a slice of pizza costs $3, then the price of a burrito must be $
Huang is determining how much Coke and Pepsi he will buy. Use the information in italics to answer the bolded question below. • Huang's preferences for Coke (C) and Pepsi (P) are represented by the following utility function: • Huang has $12 to spend on soft drinks. • The price of Coke (P) is $0.50/can. • The price of Pepsi (Pp) is $1.00/can. Without considering prices, what type of soft drink does Huang prefer. Huang always prefers Coke U = 2C + 3P Huang always prefers Pepsi Huang is indifferent between both Pepsi and Coke Huang's preference depends on how many cans he has purchased of either soft drink.
If Joe decides to allocate his entire weekly allowance between energy drinks and coffee, he could afford 9 energy drinks and 3 cups of coffee, or 6 cups of coffee and 2 energy drinks. Suppose a cup of coffee costs £2.80. a) Calculate the price of an energy drink and Joe's weekly allowance. Write down Joe's budget equation and draw the corresponding budget line. Mark the two consumption bundles mentioned above. In your graph, clearly label the axes, the budget line, and calculate the coordinates of the points of intersection of the budget line with each axis. Interpret each of those points. b) Discuss how Joe's budget set would change if his allowance was reduced by £5.20 a week. Show the relevant changes graphically. How should the price of coffee change so that Joe could still afford to buy 6 cups of coffee and 2 energy drinks? c) Discuss how Joe's budget constraint would change if the government subsidised consumption of coffee by £0.50 per cup of coffee.
Would you expect total utility to rise or fall with additional consumption of a good? Why?
Consider the figure to the right, and suppose that the initial point is A. Explain why a decrease in the price of each digital app from $3 to $2 results in a change in the marginal utilities of digital apps in a direction that is consistent with re-attainment of a new consumer optimum at point B. At A, the marginal utility per dollar spent on apps the marginal utility per dollar spent on any other item. When the price of apps falls from $3 to $2, the marginal utility per dollar spent on apps ▼ The associated rise in the quantity of apps demanded from 6 to 7 the marginal utility of apps. Together, the price and quantity changes cause the marginal utility per dollar spent on apps to consistent with a new consumer optimum at B. Price per Unit ($ per digital app) 10- 9- 1- 0 2 B 3 6 4 Digital Apps per Period D 8 9 10 Q
#Let’s say John allocates his income amounting to $240 between sushi and canned tuna. Let unit price of sushi be $20 and unit price of canned tuna be $12. Draw the budget line. Now suppose price of canned tuna decreases to $6. Draw the new budget line. Draw two indifference curves. The first should be tangent to the old budget line and the second should be tangent to the new budget line (tangency points represent the two points of consumption for John where utility is maximized before and after the price change) such that canned tuna is an inferior but not a Giffen good. In the figure, show the income, substitution and total effects.
Consider the figure to the right, and suppose that the initial point is A. Explain why a decrease in the price of each digital app from $5 to $4 results in a change in the marginal utilities of digital apps in a direction that is consistent with re-attainment of a new consumer optimum at point B. At A, the marginal utility per dollar spent on apps the marginal utility per dollar spent on any other item. When the price of apps falls from $5 to $4, the marginal utility per dollar spent on apps The associated rise in the quantity of apps demanded from 4 to 5 the marginal utility of apps. Together, the price and quantity changes cause the marginal utility per dollar spent on apps to consistent with a new consumer optimum at B. Price per Unit ($ per digital app) 10- 9- ro LO 5- 3 2- 1- 0 2 A B 3 5 6 7 Digital Apps per Period D 8 19 10