Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale, and the results shown below are among the results obtained in the study. Higher scores correspond to greater pain levels. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. Complete parts (a) to (c) below. Reduction in Pain Level After Magnet Treatment (1): n=22,x=0.58, s=0.89 Reduction in Pain Level After Sham Treatment (H2): n=22, x = 0.51, s = 1.29 H₁: H1 H2 The test statistic, t, is 0.21. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) The P-value is 0.417. (Round to three decimal places as needed.) State the conclusion for the test. OD. Ho H₁₂ H₁: H1 H2 Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment. b. Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a). -0.79 H1 H2< 0.93 (Round to two decimal places as needed.) c. Does it appear that magnets are effective in treating back pain? Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger? Choose the correct answer below. OA. It appears that magnets are effective in treating back pain, because the confidence interval contains only positive values. B. It appears that magnets are not effective in treating back pain, because the P-value is less than the significance level. OC. It appears that magnets are effective in treating back pain, because the P-value is greater than the significance level. D. It appears that magnets are not effective in treating back pain, because 0 is in the confidence interval.
Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale, and the results shown below are among the results obtained in the study. Higher scores correspond to greater pain levels. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. Complete parts (a) to (c) below. Reduction in Pain Level After Magnet Treatment (1): n=22,x=0.58, s=0.89 Reduction in Pain Level After Sham Treatment (H2): n=22, x = 0.51, s = 1.29 H₁: H1 H2 The test statistic, t, is 0.21. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) The P-value is 0.417. (Round to three decimal places as needed.) State the conclusion for the test. OD. Ho H₁₂ H₁: H1 H2 Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment. b. Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a). -0.79 H1 H2< 0.93 (Round to two decimal places as needed.) c. Does it appear that magnets are effective in treating back pain? Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger? Choose the correct answer below. OA. It appears that magnets are effective in treating back pain, because the confidence interval contains only positive values. B. It appears that magnets are not effective in treating back pain, because the P-value is less than the significance level. OC. It appears that magnets are effective in treating back pain, because the P-value is greater than the significance level. D. It appears that magnets are not effective in treating back pain, because 0 is in the confidence interval.
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
100%
Transcribed Image Text:Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale, and the results shown below are among the
results obtained in the study. Higher scores correspond to greater pain levels. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations,
and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. Complete parts (a) to (c) below.
Reduction in Pain Level After Magnet Treatment (1): n=22,x=0.58, s=0.89
Reduction in Pain Level After Sham Treatment (H2): n=22, x = 0.51, s = 1.29
H₁: H1 H2
The test statistic, t, is 0.21. (Round to two decimal places as needed.)
The P-value is 0.417. (Round to three decimal places as needed.)
State the conclusion for the test.
OD. Ho H₁₂
H₁: H1 H2
Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment.
b. Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).
-0.79 H1 H2< 0.93
(Round to two decimal places as needed.)
c. Does it appear that magnets are effective in treating back pain? Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger? Choose the correct answer below.
OA. It appears that magnets are effective in treating back pain, because the confidence interval contains only positive values.
B. It appears that magnets are not effective in treating back pain, because the P-value is less than the significance level.
OC. It appears that magnets are effective in treating back pain, because the P-value is greater than the significance level.
D. It appears that magnets are not effective in treating back pain, because 0 is in the confidence interval.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 2 images
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman