Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale, and the results shown below are among the results obtained in the study. Higher scores correspond to greater pain levels. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. Complete parts (a) to (c) below. Reduction in Pain Level After Magnet Treatment (μ₁): n = 15, x=0.55, s = 0.95 Reduction in Pain Level After Sham Treatment (μ₂): n=15, x=0.51, s = 1.43 a. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment (similar to a placebo). What are the null and alternative hypotheses? OA. Ho: H₁ #1₂ H₁: H₁ H₂ OC. Ho: H₁ H₂ OD. Ho: H₁ H₂ H₁: Hy #H₂

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
100%

Reject or Fail to Reject the null hypothesis. There is or is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment. 

The image shows a statistical analysis exercise related to the effectiveness of magnets in treating back pain.

### Instructions:
1. **Test Statistic Calculation:**
   - The test statistic, `t`, is _______. (Round to two decimal places as needed.)
   
2. **P-Value Calculation:**
   - The P-value is _______. (Round to three decimal places as needed.)
   
3. **Conclusion for the Test:**
   - □ Reject
   - □ Fail to reject 
   
   the null hypothesis. There □ is □ is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment.

4. **Confidence Interval:**
   - Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test.
   \(\mu_1 - \mu_2 \)
   (Round to two decimal places as needed.)

### Multiple Choice Questions:

#### c. Evaluation of Magnets' Effectiveness:

1. **Does it appear that magnets are effective in treating back pain?**
   - A. It appears that magnets are not effective in treating back pain, because 0 is in the confidence interval.
   - B. It appears that magnets are effective in treating back pain, because the P-value is greater than the significance level.
   - C. It appears that magnets are not effective in treating back pain, because the P-value is less than the significance level.
   - D. It appears that magnets are effective in treating back pain, because the confidence interval contains only positive values.

2. **Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be more effective if the sample sizes are larger?**
   - A. Yes, because increasing the sample size will decrease the P-value.
   - B. No, because the magnets already appear to be effective.
   - C. No, because increasing the sample size will increase the P-value.
   - D. Yes, because increasing the sample size will increase the effectiveness.

Note: The above includes placeholders for statistical values and steps that require calculation; ensure these computations are carried out accurately for proper interpretation and analysis.
Transcribed Image Text:The image shows a statistical analysis exercise related to the effectiveness of magnets in treating back pain. ### Instructions: 1. **Test Statistic Calculation:** - The test statistic, `t`, is _______. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) 2. **P-Value Calculation:** - The P-value is _______. (Round to three decimal places as needed.) 3. **Conclusion for the Test:** - □ Reject - □ Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There □ is □ is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment. 4. **Confidence Interval:** - Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test. \(\mu_1 - \mu_2 \) (Round to two decimal places as needed.) ### Multiple Choice Questions: #### c. Evaluation of Magnets' Effectiveness: 1. **Does it appear that magnets are effective in treating back pain?** - A. It appears that magnets are not effective in treating back pain, because 0 is in the confidence interval. - B. It appears that magnets are effective in treating back pain, because the P-value is greater than the significance level. - C. It appears that magnets are not effective in treating back pain, because the P-value is less than the significance level. - D. It appears that magnets are effective in treating back pain, because the confidence interval contains only positive values. 2. **Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be more effective if the sample sizes are larger?** - A. Yes, because increasing the sample size will decrease the P-value. - B. No, because the magnets already appear to be effective. - C. No, because increasing the sample size will increase the P-value. - D. Yes, because increasing the sample size will increase the effectiveness. Note: The above includes placeholders for statistical values and steps that require calculation; ensure these computations are carried out accurately for proper interpretation and analysis.
**Study on the Effectiveness of Magnets in Treating Back Pain**

Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale, with higher scores corresponding to greater pain levels. Below are the results obtained from the study. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and that the population standard deviations are not assumed to be equal.

- **Reduction in Pain Level After Magnet Treatment (\( \mu_1 \)):**
  - Sample Size (\( n \)): 15
  - Mean (\( \bar{x} \)): 0.55
  - Standard Deviation (\( s \)): 0.95

- **Reduction in Pain Level After Sham Treatment (\( \mu_2 \)):**
  - Sample Size (\( n \)): 15
  - Mean (\( \bar{x} \)): 0.51
  - Standard Deviation (\( s \)): 1.43

---

**Hypothesis Testing**

a. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment (similar to a placebo).

**What are the null and alternative hypotheses?**

**Options:**

- **A.**
  - \( H_0: \mu_1 \ne \mu_2 \)
  - \( H_1: \mu_1 < \mu_2 \)

- **B.**
  - \( H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_2 \)
  - \( H_1: \mu_1 > \mu_2 \)

- **C.**
  - \( H_0: \mu_1 < \mu_2 \)
  - \( H_1: \mu_1 \ge \mu_2 \)

- **D.**
  - \( H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_2 \)
  - \( H_1: \mu_1 \ne \mu_2 \)
Transcribed Image Text:**Study on the Effectiveness of Magnets in Treating Back Pain** Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale, with higher scores corresponding to greater pain levels. Below are the results obtained from the study. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and that the population standard deviations are not assumed to be equal. - **Reduction in Pain Level After Magnet Treatment (\( \mu_1 \)):** - Sample Size (\( n \)): 15 - Mean (\( \bar{x} \)): 0.55 - Standard Deviation (\( s \)): 0.95 - **Reduction in Pain Level After Sham Treatment (\( \mu_2 \)):** - Sample Size (\( n \)): 15 - Mean (\( \bar{x} \)): 0.51 - Standard Deviation (\( s \)): 1.43 --- **Hypothesis Testing** a. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment (similar to a placebo). **What are the null and alternative hypotheses?** **Options:** - **A.** - \( H_0: \mu_1 \ne \mu_2 \) - \( H_1: \mu_1 < \mu_2 \) - **B.** - \( H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_2 \) - \( H_1: \mu_1 > \mu_2 \) - **C.** - \( H_0: \mu_1 < \mu_2 \) - \( H_1: \mu_1 \ge \mu_2 \) - **D.** - \( H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_2 \) - \( H_1: \mu_1 \ne \mu_2 \)
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman