! Required information Parker Hannifin of Cleveland, Ohio, manufactures CNG fuel dispensers. It needs replacement equipment to streamline one of its production lines for a new contract, but it plans to sell the equipment at or before its expected life is reached at an estimated market value for used equipment. Select between the two options using the corporate MARR of 15% per year and a future worth analysis for the expected use period. Option First Cost AOC, per Year Expected Market Value Expected Use The future worth of option D is $ The future worth of option E is $ Option (Click to select) is selected. D $-73,000 $-13,000 $9,750 3 years E $-83,000 $-33,000 $10,750 6 years

! Required information Parker Hannifin of Cleveland, Ohio, manufactures CNG fuel dispensers. It needs replacement equipment to streamline one of its production lines for a new contract, but it plans to sell the equipment at or before its expected life is reached at an estimated market value for used equipment. Select between the two options using the corporate MARR of 15% per year and a future worth analysis for the expected use period. Option First Cost AOC, per Year Expected Market Value Expected Use The future worth of option D is $ The future worth of option E is $ Option (Click to select) is selected. D $-73,000 $-13,000 $9,750 3 years E $-83,000 $-33,000 $10,750 6 years

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A cost-saving device has no salvage value after 5 years. Two options: Device A: Costs $10,000 & saves $3000 annually Device B: Costs $13,500 & saves $3000 the 1st year & increases $500 annually Which alternative should be selected using incremental ROR analysis, MARR=7%?
Concurris Prototyping is committed to using the newest and finest equipment in its labs. Accordingly, Wilma, a senior engineer, has recommended that a 2-year-old piece of precision measurement equipment be replaced immediately. She believes it can be demonstrated that the proposed equipment is economically advantageous at a 15%-per year return and a planning horizon of 5 years. Perform the replacement analysis using the annual worth method, a 5-year study period, and the estimates below. Was Wilma correct? Equipment Original purchase price, $ Current market value, $ Remaining life, years Estimated value in 5 years, $ Salvage value after 15 years, $ AOC, $ per year Current -30,000 15,000 5 7,000 -11,000 The AW of the defender is $- challenger is $- Wilma ((Click to select)) correct. Proposed -40,000 -- 15 10,000 5,000 -3,000 and the AW of the
Answer it ASAP with step by step solution
Nadine Chelesvig has patented her invention. She is offering a potential manufacturer two contracts for the exclusive right to manufacture and market her product. Plan A calls for an immediate single lump sum payment to her of $175,000. Plan B calls for an annual payment of $14,000 plus a royalty of $3.90 per unit sold. The remaining life of the patent is 10 years. Nadine uses a MARR of 10%/year. What must be the uniform annual sales volume of the product for Nadine to be indifferent between the contracts, based on an units annual worth analysis? Carry all interim calculations to 5 decimal places and then round your final answer to the nearest unit. The tolerance is ±10.
If you could write out the equation once for me to see where the values should go, that would be helpful. Thank you!
Future worth and annual cash flow analysis often require far less computation than rate of return analysis Select one: True False
Carlisle Company has been cited and must invest in equipment to reduce stack emissions or face EPA fines of $16,500 per year. An emission reduction filter will cost $75,000 and have an expected life of 5 years. Carlisle's MARR is 10%/year. Part a What is the future worth of this investment? $
Concurris Prototyping is committed to using the newest and finest equipment in its labs. Accordingly, Wilma, a senior engineer, has recommended that a 2-year-old piece of precision measurement equipment be replaced immediately. She believes it can be demonstrated that the proposed equipment is economically advantageous at a 15%-per year return and a planning horizon of 5 years. Perform the replacement analysis using the annual worth method, a 5-year study period, and the estimates below. Was Wilma correct Equipment Current Proposed Original purchase price, $ Current market value, $ -30,000 -42,000 15,000 Remaining life, years 5 15 Estimated value in 5 years, $ 7,000 10,000 5,000 -3,000 Salvage value after 15 years, $ AOC, $ per year The AW of the defender is $- Wilma (Click to select) correct. -14,000 and the AW of the challenger is $-
A town in Wyoming wants to drill a geothermal well to provide district heating steam and hot water for its businesses and residences. After government subsidies, the capital investment for the well is $732,000, and the geothermal well will reduce natural gas consumption for steam and hot water production by $60,000 per year. The salvage value of the well is negligible. The simple payback period for this well is 13 years. If the MARR of the town is 5% per year and the life of the geothermal well is 23 years, what is the IRR for this project? Choose the closest answer below. A. The IRR for the project is 6.1% per year. B. The IRR for the project is 7% per year. O C. The IRR for the project is 7.4% per year. O D. The IRR for the project is 3.9% per year.
A future worth (computed at the MARR) less than zero for a project guarantees that interest in excess of the MARR has been realized by the project Select one: True O False
Annual Worth Analysis - 3 A* The AW values of three revenue alternatives are $ 30,000 for A. $ 40,000 for B, and $ 55,000 for C. On the basis of these AW values, the correct decision is to: (a) select alternative A (b). select alternative B. (c) select alternative C (d). select the do-nothing alternative.
Value Lodges owns an economy motel chain and is considering building a new 200-unit motel. The cost to build the motel is estimated at $8.000.000; Value Lodges estimates furnishings for the motel will cost an additional $700.000 and will require replacement every 5 years. Annual operating and maintenance costs for the motel are estimated to be $800,000. The average rental rate for a unit is anticipated to be $40/day. Value Lodges expects the motel to have a life of 15 years and a salvage value of $900.000 at the end of 15 years. This estimated salvage value assumes that the furnishings are not new. Furnishings have no salvage value at the end of each 5-year replacement interval. Assuming average daily occupancy percentages of 50%, 60%, 70%, and 80% for years 1 through 4, respectively, and 90% for the 5th through 15th years, a MARR of 12%/year, 365 operating days/year, and ignoring the cost of land, should the motel be built? Base your decision on an internal rate of return analysis.…