Replicate Leontief's test using the data shown in the following table Compute the capital/labor ratio for exports and imports, and enter each value in the last column of the table. Used to Produce $1 Million Worth of... Exports Imports Capital (Dollars) 1.600,000 1,500,000 The numbers in the previous table show that U.S. exports are What do the results of your test, illustrate? Check all that apply. The Leontief paradox D The Heckscher-Ohlin theory Labor (Person-years) 80 100 Capital/Labor Ratio (Dollars per person-year) Y and U.S. imports are

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question
5
4. Resolution of the Leontief paradox
The factor-endowment theory predicts that because the United States is relatively abundant in capital and relatively scarce in labor, it will export
capital-intensive goods, and its import-competing goods will be labor intensive. In the 1950s, Wassily Leontief, a Russian-American economist, tested
this proposition by analyzing the capital/labor ratios of export industries and import-competing industries, using U.S. data. He found that the
capital/labor ratio for U.S. export industries was lower than that of the United States' import-competing industries, which means that U.S. exports
were less capital intensive than import-competing goods. These findings appeared to contradict the predictions of the factor-endowment theory and
became known as the Leontief paradox.
Replicate Leontief's test using the data shown in the following table. Compute the capital/labor ratio for exports and imports, and enter each value in
the last column of the table.
Used to Produce $1 Million Worth of....
Exports
Imports
Capital
(Dollars)
1,600,000
1,500,000
The numbers in the previous table show that U.S. exports are
What do the results of your test illustrate? Check all that apply.
The Leontief paradox
D The Heckscher-Ohlin theory
Labor
(Person-years)
80
100
Capital/Labor Ratio
(Dollars per person-year)
and U.S. imports are
Which of the following explanations resolve the Leontief paradox? Check all that apply.
Leontief calculated capital/labor ratios for exports and imports, while the Heckscher-Ohlin model compares labor/capital ratios.
Leontief did not distinguish between skilled and unskilled labor.
Leontief wrongly assumed that the United States was abundant in labor.
Leontief's test focused on labor and capital only, ignoring other factors of production.
Transcribed Image Text:4. Resolution of the Leontief paradox The factor-endowment theory predicts that because the United States is relatively abundant in capital and relatively scarce in labor, it will export capital-intensive goods, and its import-competing goods will be labor intensive. In the 1950s, Wassily Leontief, a Russian-American economist, tested this proposition by analyzing the capital/labor ratios of export industries and import-competing industries, using U.S. data. He found that the capital/labor ratio for U.S. export industries was lower than that of the United States' import-competing industries, which means that U.S. exports were less capital intensive than import-competing goods. These findings appeared to contradict the predictions of the factor-endowment theory and became known as the Leontief paradox. Replicate Leontief's test using the data shown in the following table. Compute the capital/labor ratio for exports and imports, and enter each value in the last column of the table. Used to Produce $1 Million Worth of.... Exports Imports Capital (Dollars) 1,600,000 1,500,000 The numbers in the previous table show that U.S. exports are What do the results of your test illustrate? Check all that apply. The Leontief paradox D The Heckscher-Ohlin theory Labor (Person-years) 80 100 Capital/Labor Ratio (Dollars per person-year) and U.S. imports are Which of the following explanations resolve the Leontief paradox? Check all that apply. Leontief calculated capital/labor ratios for exports and imports, while the Heckscher-Ohlin model compares labor/capital ratios. Leontief did not distinguish between skilled and unskilled labor. Leontief wrongly assumed that the United States was abundant in labor. Leontief's test focused on labor and capital only, ignoring other factors of production.
4. Resolution of the Leontief paradox
The factor-endowment theory predicts that because the United States is relatively abundant in capital and relatively scarce in labor, it will export
capital intensive goods, and its import-competing goods will be labor intensive. In the 1950s, Wassily Leontief, a Russian-American economist, tested
this proposition by analyzing the capital/labor ratios of export industries and import-competing industries, using U.S. data. He found that the
capital/labor ratio for U.S. export industries was lower than that of the United States' import-competing industries, which means that U.S. exports
were less capital intensive than import-competing goods. These findings appeared to contradict the predictions of the factor-endowment theory and
became known as the Leontief paradox.
Replicate Leontief's test using the data shown in the following table. Compute the capital/labor ratio for exports and imports, and enter each value in
the last column of the table.
Capital
Used to Produce $1 Million Worth of.... (Dollars)
1.600.000
1,500,000
Exports
Imports
The numbers in the previous table show that U.S. exports are
.
The Leontief paradox
The Heckscher-Ohlin theory
Labor
(Person-years)
80
100
Capital/Labor Ratio
(Dollars per person-year)
neither labor nor capital intensive
What do the results of your test, illustrate? Check all that apply both labor and capital intensive
capital intensive
labor intensive
and U.S. imports are
4
Which of the following explanations resolve the Leontief paradox? Check all that apply
Leontief calculated capital/labor ratios for exports and imports, while the Heckscher-Ohlin model compares labor/capital ratios.
Leontief did not distinguish between skilled and unskilled labor.
Leontef wrongly assumed that the United States was abundant in labor
Leonbef's test focused on labor and capital only, ignoring other factors of production.
Transcribed Image Text:4. Resolution of the Leontief paradox The factor-endowment theory predicts that because the United States is relatively abundant in capital and relatively scarce in labor, it will export capital intensive goods, and its import-competing goods will be labor intensive. In the 1950s, Wassily Leontief, a Russian-American economist, tested this proposition by analyzing the capital/labor ratios of export industries and import-competing industries, using U.S. data. He found that the capital/labor ratio for U.S. export industries was lower than that of the United States' import-competing industries, which means that U.S. exports were less capital intensive than import-competing goods. These findings appeared to contradict the predictions of the factor-endowment theory and became known as the Leontief paradox. Replicate Leontief's test using the data shown in the following table. Compute the capital/labor ratio for exports and imports, and enter each value in the last column of the table. Capital Used to Produce $1 Million Worth of.... (Dollars) 1.600.000 1,500,000 Exports Imports The numbers in the previous table show that U.S. exports are . The Leontief paradox The Heckscher-Ohlin theory Labor (Person-years) 80 100 Capital/Labor Ratio (Dollars per person-year) neither labor nor capital intensive What do the results of your test, illustrate? Check all that apply both labor and capital intensive capital intensive labor intensive and U.S. imports are 4 Which of the following explanations resolve the Leontief paradox? Check all that apply Leontief calculated capital/labor ratios for exports and imports, while the Heckscher-Ohlin model compares labor/capital ratios. Leontief did not distinguish between skilled and unskilled labor. Leontef wrongly assumed that the United States was abundant in labor Leonbef's test focused on labor and capital only, ignoring other factors of production.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Nash Equilibrium
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education